A cross-national data collaboration of domestic violence specialist courts: a research note

R. Holder
{"title":"A cross-national data collaboration of domestic violence specialist courts: a research note","authors":"R. Holder","doi":"10.1080/01924036.2019.1599971","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Specialised domestic violence (DV) courts exist in a number of common law countries. While site-specific evaluations show promise, there remains much dissimilarity to the processes and components of these courts that raise questions about cross-national comparison. This article discusses a project to reduce data variation by applying a standardised data grid in court sites in three different countries. Part of a larger research programme of the Canadian Observatory on Justice Responses to Intimate Partner Violence, the pilot shows that, with site-specific adaptions, a standardised grid can reduce variation and is feasible as a data-collection instrument. However, the pilot also reveals how the shared objectives of specialised DV courts across countries are undermined by the absence of core data especially that related to victims. Further, standardised cross-national court data collection can unhelpfully minimise differences in local legal and social cultures that are important to justice system priority-setting.","PeriodicalId":45887,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice","volume":"44 1","pages":"231 - 246"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/01924036.2019.1599971","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01924036.2019.1599971","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT Specialised domestic violence (DV) courts exist in a number of common law countries. While site-specific evaluations show promise, there remains much dissimilarity to the processes and components of these courts that raise questions about cross-national comparison. This article discusses a project to reduce data variation by applying a standardised data grid in court sites in three different countries. Part of a larger research programme of the Canadian Observatory on Justice Responses to Intimate Partner Violence, the pilot shows that, with site-specific adaptions, a standardised grid can reduce variation and is feasible as a data-collection instrument. However, the pilot also reveals how the shared objectives of specialised DV courts across countries are undermined by the absence of core data especially that related to victims. Further, standardised cross-national court data collection can unhelpfully minimise differences in local legal and social cultures that are important to justice system priority-setting.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
家庭暴力专家法庭的跨国数据协作:一份研究报告
许多英美法系国家都设有专门的家庭暴力法庭。虽然具体地点的评估显示出希望,但这些法院的程序和组成部分仍然存在很大的不同,这就提出了关于跨国比较的问题。本文讨论了一个通过在三个不同国家的法院场地应用标准化数据网格来减少数据变化的项目。作为加拿大对亲密伴侣暴力的司法反应观察站的一个更大的研究方案的一部分,该试点表明,通过具体地点的调整,标准化网格可以减少变化,并且作为数据收集工具是可行的。然而,该试点也揭示出,由于缺乏核心数据,特别是与受害者有关的核心数据,各国专门家庭暴力法庭的共同目标受到了破坏。此外,标准化的跨国法院数据收集可能无益地减少当地法律和社会文化的差异,而这些差异对司法系统确定优先事项至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
18
期刊最新文献
Exploring public cooperation with police: the role of police accountability, police effectiveness, and public trust A review of restorative justice programmes for First Nations Peoples in Queensland Citizens’ sex offence myths and perceived effectiveness of sex offender community notification in South Korea Legitimacy of the courts: evidence from a survey in Punjab, Pakistan Editorial transition and future directions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1