Dan IV: The Iron Age I Settlement. The Avraham Biran Excavations (1966–1999)

IF 0.5 2区 历史学 0 ARCHAEOLOGY Levant Pub Date : 2022-05-04 DOI:10.1080/00758914.2022.2112866
M. Pucci
{"title":"Dan IV: The Iron Age I Settlement. The Avraham Biran Excavations (1966–1999)","authors":"M. Pucci","doi":"10.1080/00758914.2022.2112866","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"cal and production-oriented analysis of the textile tools from Episkopi-Bamboula, while Artzy (Chapter 11) offers a discussion on the ceramic wares of the Middle and Late Bronze Age, concerning especially the Cypriot Bichrome ware. Chovanec and Fourentzos (Chapter 12) provide a thorough review on the study of opium poppy in the Late Bronze Age Eastern Mediterranean and new insights for the Cypriot Iron Age, while London (Chapter 13) explores the benefits of an ethnoarchaeological approach in the investigation of diverse ceramic markings coupled with the technological and social world of pithos making. Turning to the theme of regional connectivity (Section V), Bergoffen (Chapter 14) uses a fragmentary White Painted Hand-made crater from Enkomi for reviewing issues of style, cross-cultural interactions, inter-media inspirations and symbolic appropriation during the early Late Cypriot. By taking a leap of about a millennium, Kushnet (Chapter 15) uses diverse statistical techniques on coinage and ceramics for revealing patterns of connectivity, trade, economy and politics among the 6th–4th century BC Cypriot city-kingdoms. Moving further forward in time, Leonard (Chapter 16) offers a stimulating article rooted in multiple data strands (surveys, written and ethnographic sources, geographical and topographical information) for locating the island’s roman harbours and elucidating their maritime trade activity. The meticulous description of the exchange networks of the 20th century Cypriot carob industry, presented here as an analogy for the diverse roman trade networks, provokes the rethinking of the role of the Cypriot landscape in connectivity, mobility and prosperity. The last two chapters (Section VI) discuss future directions for Cypriot Archaeology within the framework of past and present research. Swantek and Weir (Chapter 17) embrace Swiny’s project at SotiraKaminoudhia and reveal their research agenda for its future, with more excavations, science-based methodologies, coupledwith ethnographic work and landscape development formaking the area attractive to locals and tourists. Lastly, Knapp (Chapter 18) concludes the volume by reviewing the trends of Cypriot prehistory over the last 40 years.Despite his rather festive acknowledgement of people and projects impacting the discipline, he highlights that much of the current research, regardless of its advance science-based nature, is still relatively under-theorized and ‘firmly grounded in the data’ (p. 237); a pattern also reflected in this volume. Overall, despite the aforementioned diversity, the editors successfully group the articles in meaningful sections, thus, offering multiple pathways for approaching similar concepts. The multiplicity of topics, periods, methodologies and datasets make this volume an asset for anyone working on Cypriot archaeology. The articles on Swiny’s legacy (1–3) indirectly enrich the history of the discipline by revealing diverse aspects of CAARI’s past, while the numerous review-based chapters (4, 6, 12, 18) consist of priceless sources of information on topics ranging from the Eastern Mediterranean palaeoenvironment, Cypriot surveys, the history of Cypriot prehistory and the study of opium poppies in the Eastern Mediterranean. Only a few chapters (11, 14) are aimed mainly at experts of Middle–Late Cypriot ceramics, while others use diverse methodologies and/or theoretical orientations for making new datasets available (Chapter 10), or for proposing new interpretative schemes linked to the Early Neolithic (Chapter 5), Archaic-Classical (Chapter 15), and Roman (Chapter 16) Cyprus. Finally, two Chapters (7, 9) are distinguished for applying relatively innovative theoretical schemes, one combines creative experiential approaches with traditional methodologies (Chapter 8), and a last one incorporates a stimulating ethnoarchaeological view (Chapter 13). The multivocality achieved by the editors, which successfully reflects both the essence of the title All things Cypriot and the work of Swiny, is unified by the initial chronological tables and maps, the exceptional editorial work in terms of citations, bibliographical entries and chapter layouts, coupled with the intelligible language and high-quality figures; making this volume a pleasant and informative read.","PeriodicalId":45348,"journal":{"name":"Levant","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Levant","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00758914.2022.2112866","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

cal and production-oriented analysis of the textile tools from Episkopi-Bamboula, while Artzy (Chapter 11) offers a discussion on the ceramic wares of the Middle and Late Bronze Age, concerning especially the Cypriot Bichrome ware. Chovanec and Fourentzos (Chapter 12) provide a thorough review on the study of opium poppy in the Late Bronze Age Eastern Mediterranean and new insights for the Cypriot Iron Age, while London (Chapter 13) explores the benefits of an ethnoarchaeological approach in the investigation of diverse ceramic markings coupled with the technological and social world of pithos making. Turning to the theme of regional connectivity (Section V), Bergoffen (Chapter 14) uses a fragmentary White Painted Hand-made crater from Enkomi for reviewing issues of style, cross-cultural interactions, inter-media inspirations and symbolic appropriation during the early Late Cypriot. By taking a leap of about a millennium, Kushnet (Chapter 15) uses diverse statistical techniques on coinage and ceramics for revealing patterns of connectivity, trade, economy and politics among the 6th–4th century BC Cypriot city-kingdoms. Moving further forward in time, Leonard (Chapter 16) offers a stimulating article rooted in multiple data strands (surveys, written and ethnographic sources, geographical and topographical information) for locating the island’s roman harbours and elucidating their maritime trade activity. The meticulous description of the exchange networks of the 20th century Cypriot carob industry, presented here as an analogy for the diverse roman trade networks, provokes the rethinking of the role of the Cypriot landscape in connectivity, mobility and prosperity. The last two chapters (Section VI) discuss future directions for Cypriot Archaeology within the framework of past and present research. Swantek and Weir (Chapter 17) embrace Swiny’s project at SotiraKaminoudhia and reveal their research agenda for its future, with more excavations, science-based methodologies, coupledwith ethnographic work and landscape development formaking the area attractive to locals and tourists. Lastly, Knapp (Chapter 18) concludes the volume by reviewing the trends of Cypriot prehistory over the last 40 years.Despite his rather festive acknowledgement of people and projects impacting the discipline, he highlights that much of the current research, regardless of its advance science-based nature, is still relatively under-theorized and ‘firmly grounded in the data’ (p. 237); a pattern also reflected in this volume. Overall, despite the aforementioned diversity, the editors successfully group the articles in meaningful sections, thus, offering multiple pathways for approaching similar concepts. The multiplicity of topics, periods, methodologies and datasets make this volume an asset for anyone working on Cypriot archaeology. The articles on Swiny’s legacy (1–3) indirectly enrich the history of the discipline by revealing diverse aspects of CAARI’s past, while the numerous review-based chapters (4, 6, 12, 18) consist of priceless sources of information on topics ranging from the Eastern Mediterranean palaeoenvironment, Cypriot surveys, the history of Cypriot prehistory and the study of opium poppies in the Eastern Mediterranean. Only a few chapters (11, 14) are aimed mainly at experts of Middle–Late Cypriot ceramics, while others use diverse methodologies and/or theoretical orientations for making new datasets available (Chapter 10), or for proposing new interpretative schemes linked to the Early Neolithic (Chapter 5), Archaic-Classical (Chapter 15), and Roman (Chapter 16) Cyprus. Finally, two Chapters (7, 9) are distinguished for applying relatively innovative theoretical schemes, one combines creative experiential approaches with traditional methodologies (Chapter 8), and a last one incorporates a stimulating ethnoarchaeological view (Chapter 13). The multivocality achieved by the editors, which successfully reflects both the essence of the title All things Cypriot and the work of Swiny, is unified by the initial chronological tables and maps, the exceptional editorial work in terms of citations, bibliographical entries and chapter layouts, coupled with the intelligible language and high-quality figures; making this volume a pleasant and informative read.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
丹四世:铁器时代一定居。Avraham Biran发掘(1966–1999)
对Episkopi Bamboula纺织工具的分析和生产导向,而Artzy(第11章)则对青铜时代中晚期的陶瓷器进行了讨论,尤其是塞浦路斯的双色器。Chovanec和Fourentzos(第12章)对青铜时代晚期东地中海的罂粟研究进行了全面回顾,并对塞浦路斯铁器时代提出了新的见解,而伦敦(第13章)则探讨了民族考古方法在调查不同陶瓷标记以及木髓制作的技术和社会世界方面的好处。谈到区域连通性的主题(第五节),Bergoven(第14章)使用恩科米的一个零碎的手绘白色弹坑来回顾早期晚期塞浦路斯人的风格、跨文化互动、媒体间灵感和象征挪用问题。Kushnet(第15章)跨越了大约一千年,在铸币和陶瓷方面使用了多种统计技术,揭示了公元前6至4世纪塞浦路斯城市王国之间的联系、贸易、经济和政治模式。随着时间的推移,Leonard(第16章)提供了一篇植根于多个数据链(调查、书面和民族志来源、地理和地形信息)的刺激性文章,用于定位该岛的罗马港口并阐明其海上贸易活动。这里对20世纪塞浦路斯胡萝卜产业的交换网络进行了细致的描述,作为对罗马多样化贸易网络的类比,引发了对塞浦路斯景观在连通性、流动性和繁荣中的作用的重新思考。最后两章(第六节)在过去和现在的研究框架内讨论了塞浦路斯考古的未来方向。Swantek和Weir(第17章)接受了Swiny在SotiraKaminoudhia的项目,并揭示了他们未来的研究议程,更多的挖掘、基于科学的方法、民族志工作和景观开发相结合,形成了对当地人和游客有吸引力的地区。最后,Knapp(第18章)通过回顾过去40年塞浦路斯史前史的趋势来总结本卷。尽管他相当喜庆地承认影响该学科的人和项目,但他强调,目前的许多研究,无论其先进的科学性质如何,仍然相对缺乏理论,并且“牢牢地基于数据”(第237页);这种模式也反映在本卷中。总的来说,尽管存在上述多样性,编辑们还是成功地将文章分为有意义的部分,从而为处理类似的概念提供了多种途径。主题、时期、方法和数据集的多样性使本卷成为塞浦路斯考古工作者的一笔财富。关于Swiny遗产的文章(1-3)通过揭示CAARI过去的不同方面,间接丰富了该学科的历史,而众多基于综述的章节(4、6、12、18)包含了从东地中海古环境、塞浦路斯调查、,塞浦路斯史前史和东地中海罂粟研究。只有少数章节(11、14)主要针对中晚期塞浦路斯陶瓷专家,而其他章节则使用不同的方法和/或理论方向来提供新的数据集(第10章),或提出与新石器时代早期(第5章)、古代古典(第15章)和罗马(第16章)塞浦路斯相关的新解释方案。最后,两章(7,9)因应用相对创新的理论方案而有所不同,一章将创造性的经验方法与传统方法论相结合(第8章),最后一章结合了刺激性的民族考古观点(第13章)。编辑们所实现的多元发声,成功地反映了标题《All things塞浦路斯人》和《Swiny的作品》的本质,通过最初的时间表和地图,在引文、书目条目和章节布局方面的出色编辑工作,加上易懂的语言和高质量的数字,实现了统一;使这本书读起来既愉快又内容丰富。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Levant
Levant ARCHAEOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
25.00%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: Levant is the international peer-reviewed journal of the Council for British Research in the Levant (CBRL), a British Academy-sponsored institute with research centres in Amman and Jerusalem, but which also supports research in Syria, Lebanon and Cyprus. Contributions from a wide variety of areas, including anthropology, archaeology, geography, history, language and literature, political studies, religion, sociology and tourism, are encouraged. While contributions to Levant should be in English, the journal actively seeks to publish papers from researchers of any nationality who are working in its areas of interest.
期刊最新文献
A micro-geoarchaeological look at adaptive and glocal socio-economic aspects: the case of Middle Bronze Age Tel Dor, Israel New evidence for Neolithic occupation in north-west Arabia: Standing Stone Circles on the Harrat ‘Uwayrid Documenting the ḥarra’s epigraphic heritage: New Palmyrene Inscriptions from the Jordanian ḥarra A unique Frankish-period object from Miʿilyā – Castellum Regis Not a place for respectable people, but the ends of the earth converge there: insights from Wisad Pools into the nature and context of Jordan’s Black Desert Neolithic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1