The Effects of Task Selection Approaches to Emphasis Manipulation on Cognitive Load and Knowledge Transfer

Q3 Social Sciences IAFOR Journal of Education Pub Date : 2021-08-27 DOI:10.22492/ije.9.4.05
Seohyun Choi, Jaewon Jung, Dongsik Kim
{"title":"The Effects of Task Selection Approaches to Emphasis Manipulation on Cognitive Load and Knowledge Transfer","authors":"Seohyun Choi, Jaewon Jung, Dongsik Kim","doi":"10.22492/ije.9.4.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Emphasis manipulation is a way to help learners by directing their attention to particular subcomponents of a learning task. This study investigated the effects of different approaches to emphasis manipulation on knowledge transfer and cognitive load. This was done by examining the impact of three task selection strategies: system-controlled, learner-controlled, and shared-controlled. Forty-five students (n = 45) in the first or second year of high school were randomly assigned to three groups and each group used a different type of task selection to manipulate emphasis in a complex learning context. The system-controlled group carried out learning tasks that were identified as essential by the system. The learner-controlled group selected and carried out learning tasks they needed to learn. The shared-controlled group chose and carried out learning tasks that they wanted to learn from a list of suggested learning tasks. The tasks had four learning phases: pre-test, training, mental-effort rating, and transfer test. After participants completed the training, their cognitive load was measured. One week after the training, a transfer test was conducted to measure the constituent skill acquisition. The findings revealed that the system-controlled task selection strategy was the most effective in optimizing cognitive load and enhancing knowledge transfer. In addition, learners benefited from personalized guidance on learning task selection based on their expertise. Given that the shared-controlled task selection method was more effective thank the learner-controlled task selection, this study’s results indicate that learners should be provided with information about how to select learning tasks when they are allowed to do so.","PeriodicalId":52248,"journal":{"name":"IAFOR Journal of Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IAFOR Journal of Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22492/ije.9.4.05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Emphasis manipulation is a way to help learners by directing their attention to particular subcomponents of a learning task. This study investigated the effects of different approaches to emphasis manipulation on knowledge transfer and cognitive load. This was done by examining the impact of three task selection strategies: system-controlled, learner-controlled, and shared-controlled. Forty-five students (n = 45) in the first or second year of high school were randomly assigned to three groups and each group used a different type of task selection to manipulate emphasis in a complex learning context. The system-controlled group carried out learning tasks that were identified as essential by the system. The learner-controlled group selected and carried out learning tasks they needed to learn. The shared-controlled group chose and carried out learning tasks that they wanted to learn from a list of suggested learning tasks. The tasks had four learning phases: pre-test, training, mental-effort rating, and transfer test. After participants completed the training, their cognitive load was measured. One week after the training, a transfer test was conducted to measure the constituent skill acquisition. The findings revealed that the system-controlled task selection strategy was the most effective in optimizing cognitive load and enhancing knowledge transfer. In addition, learners benefited from personalized guidance on learning task selection based on their expertise. Given that the shared-controlled task selection method was more effective thank the learner-controlled task selection, this study’s results indicate that learners should be provided with information about how to select learning tasks when they are allowed to do so.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
强调操作任务选择方法对认知负荷和知识迁移的影响
强调操纵是一种帮助学习者将注意力集中在学习任务的特定子组件上的方法。本研究调查了不同强调操作方法对知识转移和认知负荷的影响。这是通过考察三种任务选择策略的影响来完成的:系统控制、学习者控制和共享控制。四十五名高中一年级或二年级的学生(n=45)被随机分配到三组,每组使用不同类型的任务选择来在复杂的学习环境中操纵重点。系统控制组执行被系统确定为必不可少的学习任务。学习者控制组选择并执行他们需要学习的学习任务。共享对照组从建议的学习任务列表中选择并执行他们想要学习的学习任务。这些任务分为四个学习阶段:预测试、训练、脑力劳动评分和迁移测试。参与者完成训练后,测量他们的认知负荷。培训一周后,进行了一次迁移测试,以衡量组成部分的技能习得情况。研究结果表明,系统控制的任务选择策略在优化认知负荷和促进知识转移方面最为有效。此外,学习者还受益于基于其专业知识选择学习任务的个性化指导。鉴于共享控制任务选择方法比学习者控制任务选择更有效,本研究的结果表明,当允许学习者选择学习任务时,应向学习者提供如何选择学习任务的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
IAFOR Journal of Education
IAFOR Journal of Education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊最新文献
Intercultural Communication: The Perceptions of Lebanese High School Directors Adoption of Innovative ELT Strategies by English Language Teachers in Rural Laos Examining Students’ Perspectives on Pedagogical Translanguaging in the Multilingual Classroom Context Enriching Students’ Cross-Cultural and Multilingual Communication: The Serious Play Approach Utilizing Playmobil Pro Figures Language Attrition and Cultural Identity Dynamics in International Schools in Azerbaijan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1