Lezers in de marges van Vondels Palamedes

Q3 Arts and Humanities Nederlandse Letterkunde Pub Date : 2019-03-01 DOI:10.5117/nedlet2019.1.002.lass
A. Lassche, A. Visser
{"title":"Lezers in de marges van Vondels Palamedes","authors":"A. Lassche, A. Visser","doi":"10.5117/nedlet2019.1.002.lass","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n Readers in the margins of Vondel’s Palamedes: A census of seventeenth-century editions in public collections\n \n \n This article explores how Joost van den Vondel’s politically charged play Palamedes (first published in 1625) was read in the seventeenth century. It presents the findings of a systematic and focused census of copies of 25 seventeenth-century editions that have been preserved in public collections. Inspection of 150 copies has resulted in identifying 32 copies with manuscript annotations. Viewed together these annotated copies show the importance of different forms of collective reading. Two general patterns can be distinguished, documenting on the one hand different forms of rhetorical and stylistic analysis, made for didactic or studious use. Another category reveals a persistent interest in decoding, remembering, and sharing the political meaning of the play. This category includes a set of annotations that probably derived from Vondel’s biographer Geeraert Brandt, which circulated in manuscript before appearing in print in 1705. As an exercise in census-research, this case also confirms the idea of the long life of the book, documenting extended use and enrichment of individual copies.","PeriodicalId":39266,"journal":{"name":"Nederlandse Letterkunde","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nederlandse Letterkunde","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5117/nedlet2019.1.002.lass","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Readers in the margins of Vondel’s Palamedes: A census of seventeenth-century editions in public collections This article explores how Joost van den Vondel’s politically charged play Palamedes (first published in 1625) was read in the seventeenth century. It presents the findings of a systematic and focused census of copies of 25 seventeenth-century editions that have been preserved in public collections. Inspection of 150 copies has resulted in identifying 32 copies with manuscript annotations. Viewed together these annotated copies show the importance of different forms of collective reading. Two general patterns can be distinguished, documenting on the one hand different forms of rhetorical and stylistic analysis, made for didactic or studious use. Another category reveals a persistent interest in decoding, remembering, and sharing the political meaning of the play. This category includes a set of annotations that probably derived from Vondel’s biographer Geeraert Brandt, which circulated in manuscript before appearing in print in 1705. As an exercise in census-research, this case also confirms the idea of the long life of the book, documenting extended use and enrichment of individual copies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Vondels Palamedes边缘的读者
《冯德的宫殿》边缘的读者:公共收藏中17世纪版本的普查本文探讨了约斯特·范登·沃德尔的政治戏剧《宫殿》(1625年首次出版)在17世纪是如何被阅读的。它介绍了对保存在公共收藏中的25本17世纪版本的副本进行系统和重点普查的结果。对150份复印件的检查发现,有32份复印件附有手稿注释。将这些带注释的副本放在一起看,可以看出不同形式的集体阅读的重要性。可以区分两种常见的模式,一方面记录不同形式的修辞和文体分析,用于教学或刻意使用。另一个类别揭示了对解码、记忆和分享该剧政治意义的持续兴趣。这一类别包括一组注释,可能来源于冯德尔的传记作家吉拉特·勃兰特,该注释在1705年印刷之前以手稿形式流传。作为人口普查研究的一项实践,这个案例也证实了这本书寿命长的想法,记录了个人副本的长期使用和丰富。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nederlandse Letterkunde
Nederlandse Letterkunde Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊最新文献
Wat maakt elektronische literatuur (niet) toegankelijk? Aandacht voor irrelevantie. Voskuils Het Bureau als proto-databankroman Van oude mannen en de dames die erbij staan. De liefdesopvattingen van de Rose-Cassamus Een goddelijke braakbal. Maxim Februari’s Klont en de esthetiek van dataficering De verbeelding van het internet in de Nederlandse literatuur van de jaren negentig
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1