At Last—Empirical Proof That the “R-Word” Really Must Go: The Influence of Terminology on Tolerance

Gayle L. Garcia, D. H. Granello, Karly D. Boehm
{"title":"At Last—Empirical Proof That the “R-Word” Really Must Go: The Influence of Terminology on Tolerance","authors":"Gayle L. Garcia, D. H. Granello, Karly D. Boehm","doi":"10.1352/2326-6988-8.2.155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n College undergraduate students (N = 259), were given a measure of tolerance toward people with intellectual disability. Half of the sample was given a version that used the term mentally retarded, and half was given a version that used person with intellectual disability. Individuals receiving the version with mentally retarded had lower levels of tolerance on all four subscales of the instrument. They scored significantly higher on the subscales of Exclusion and Sheltering and significantly lower on the subscales of Empowerment and Similarities than their peers who received the version using the term person with intellectual disability.","PeriodicalId":93183,"journal":{"name":"Inclusion (Washington, D.C.)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Inclusion (Washington, D.C.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1352/2326-6988-8.2.155","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

College undergraduate students (N = 259), were given a measure of tolerance toward people with intellectual disability. Half of the sample was given a version that used the term mentally retarded, and half was given a version that used person with intellectual disability. Individuals receiving the version with mentally retarded had lower levels of tolerance on all four subscales of the instrument. They scored significantly higher on the subscales of Exclusion and Sheltering and significantly lower on the subscales of Empowerment and Similarities than their peers who received the version using the term person with intellectual disability.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
最后——“R字”真的必须走的经验证明——术语对容忍度的影响
大学本科生(N=259)对智障人士进行了一定程度的宽容。一半的样本被提供了一个使用“弱智”一词的版本,一半被提供了使用智障人士的版本。接受智障治疗的个体在该仪器的所有四个分量表上的耐受水平都较低。与使用“智障人士”一词的同龄人相比,他们在“排斥”和“庇护”分量表上的得分明显更高,在“赋权”和“相似性”分量表中的得分明显更低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Emergency COVID-19 Pandemic Changes to Home- and Community-Based Services for People With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities It “Goes Both Ways”: The Impact of Peer-Mediated Interventions on Peers Barriers to Community Participation for Adults Aging With an Intellectual Disability in Ireland: A Longitudinal Study Perspectives of College Students With Intellectual Disability on Peer Mentoring Relationships Résumés en Français
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1