Outcomes in patients with spinal muscular atrophy given nusinersen, onasemnogene abeparvovec or no treatment: an analysis based on restricted mean survival time

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Expert Opinion on Orphan Drugs Pub Date : 2020-07-27 DOI:10.1080/21678707.2020.1802719
L. Bartoli, A. Messori
{"title":"Outcomes in patients with spinal muscular atrophy given nusinersen, onasemnogene abeparvovec or no treatment: an analysis based on restricted mean survival time","authors":"L. Bartoli, A. Messori","doi":"10.1080/21678707.2020.1802719","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Objectives Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a rare neuromuscular disorder. Currently there are two approved drug treatments for SMA: nusinersen and onasemnogene abeparvovec (OAX). The purpose of the present study was to analyze and compare the event-free survival observed in patients with infantile-onset of SMA receiving nusinersen, OAX or no treatment. The comparison was based on the restricted mean survival time (RMST). Methods The cohorts included in the analyses (nusinersen, 17 patients; OAX, 10 patients; no treatment, 23 patients) were obtained from a standard PubMed search. For each cohort, the values of RMST were determined from the Kaplan-Meier curves reported in these studies (end-point: death or need for permanent ventilation). The RMST was calculated using a model-independent method. Results The RMST of nusinersen at 33 months of follow up was 25.05 months (95%confidence interval [CI], 23.86 to 26.23) vs 13.90 (95%CI 12.73 to 15.06) for no treatment. The RMST of OAX at 57 months was 57.00 vs 18.32 (95%CI 16.89 to 19.76) for no treatment. Conclusion Our analyses defined a robust methodological framework to quantify the outcomes of these treatments. This study needs to be repeated after these treatments have achieved a longer follow-up than that presently available.","PeriodicalId":12118,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Orphan Drugs","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/21678707.2020.1802719","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Orphan Drugs","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21678707.2020.1802719","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objectives Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a rare neuromuscular disorder. Currently there are two approved drug treatments for SMA: nusinersen and onasemnogene abeparvovec (OAX). The purpose of the present study was to analyze and compare the event-free survival observed in patients with infantile-onset of SMA receiving nusinersen, OAX or no treatment. The comparison was based on the restricted mean survival time (RMST). Methods The cohorts included in the analyses (nusinersen, 17 patients; OAX, 10 patients; no treatment, 23 patients) were obtained from a standard PubMed search. For each cohort, the values of RMST were determined from the Kaplan-Meier curves reported in these studies (end-point: death or need for permanent ventilation). The RMST was calculated using a model-independent method. Results The RMST of nusinersen at 33 months of follow up was 25.05 months (95%confidence interval [CI], 23.86 to 26.23) vs 13.90 (95%CI 12.73 to 15.06) for no treatment. The RMST of OAX at 57 months was 57.00 vs 18.32 (95%CI 16.89 to 19.76) for no treatment. Conclusion Our analyses defined a robust methodological framework to quantify the outcomes of these treatments. This study needs to be repeated after these treatments have achieved a longer follow-up than that presently available.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
脊髓性肌萎缩患者接受nusinersen、onaseminogene abeparvovec或不接受治疗的结果:基于限制平均生存时间的分析
摘要目的脊髓性肌萎缩(SMA)是一种罕见的神经肌肉疾病。目前有两种已批准的SMA药物治疗方法:nusinersen和onasemnogene abeparvovec(OAX)。本研究的目的是分析和比较接受nusinersen、OAX或未接受治疗的婴儿期SMA发作患者的无事件生存率。比较基于限制平均生存时间(RMST)。方法纳入分析的队列(nusinersen,17名患者;OAX,10名患者;无治疗,23名患者)从标准PubMed搜索中获得。对于每个队列,RMST的值由这些研究中报告的Kaplan-Meier曲线确定(终点:死亡或需要永久通气)。RMST采用独立于模型的方法进行计算。结果nusinersen在随访33个月时的RMST为25.05个月(95%可信区间为23.86至26.23),而未治疗的RMST则为13.90(95%置信区间为12.73至15.06)。OAX在57个月时的RMST为57.00,而未接受治疗时为18.32(95%CI 16.89至19.76)。结论我们的分析确定了一个强有力的方法框架来量化这些治疗的结果。在这些治疗获得比目前更长的随访时间后,需要重复这项研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Expert Opinion on Orphan Drugs
Expert Opinion on Orphan Drugs PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
期刊介绍: Expert Opinion on Orphan Drugs is an international, peer-reviewed journal that covers all aspects of R&D on rare diseases and orphan drugs.
期刊最新文献
Emerging therapies against Naegleria fowleri Management of pulmonary hypertension in infants Current and emerging therapies for the treatment of leishmaniasis The Orphan Drug Act and rare cancers: a retrospective analysis of oncologic orphan drug designations and associated approvals from 1983-2022 Orphan drugs approved in Canada: health technology assessment, price negotiation, and government formulary listing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1