Critical Belonging: Cohabitation, Plurality, and Critique in Butler’s Parting Ways

Q4 Arts and Humanities Redescriptions Pub Date : 2021-07-22 DOI:10.33134/rds.340
Miri Rozmarin
{"title":"Critical Belonging: Cohabitation, Plurality, and Critique in Butler’s Parting Ways","authors":"Miri Rozmarin","doi":"10.33134/rds.340","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article engages Judith Butler’s Parting Ways as a way to rethink the relations between critique and belonging as two aspects of contemporary political subjectivities. I argue that for Butler critique is an action performed by corporeal subjects. As such, it depends on cohabitation being an ontological condition. Belonging, in the sense of sharing a place with others, assesses an affirmative stance – the commitment to safeguard the common conditions for a plurality of lives. The first part of the article regards Butler’s theorization of cohabitation and plurality as a framework in which the corporeal and embodied relations with others who share a place serve as a condition for critique rather than its limit. I argue that Butler’s Arendtian social ontology aims to offer a vision of political subjectivity that differs from contemporary forms of subjectivation. I further argue that in order to promote such vision of political subjectivity, a detailed description of cohabitation is required as a multi-layered affective and emotional relation with one’s surroundings. The second part of the article focuses on how Butler performs in her text this alternative vision of political subjectivity that affirms pluralization as a normative principle. By studying Butler’s account of her Jewishness as well as textual practices shaping the text, I argue that belonging can become a formative aspect of the critical subject through the acts of norms on one’s body as well as by critical engagement.","PeriodicalId":33650,"journal":{"name":"Redescriptions","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Redescriptions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33134/rds.340","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article engages Judith Butler’s Parting Ways as a way to rethink the relations between critique and belonging as two aspects of contemporary political subjectivities. I argue that for Butler critique is an action performed by corporeal subjects. As such, it depends on cohabitation being an ontological condition. Belonging, in the sense of sharing a place with others, assesses an affirmative stance – the commitment to safeguard the common conditions for a plurality of lives. The first part of the article regards Butler’s theorization of cohabitation and plurality as a framework in which the corporeal and embodied relations with others who share a place serve as a condition for critique rather than its limit. I argue that Butler’s Arendtian social ontology aims to offer a vision of political subjectivity that differs from contemporary forms of subjectivation. I further argue that in order to promote such vision of political subjectivity, a detailed description of cohabitation is required as a multi-layered affective and emotional relation with one’s surroundings. The second part of the article focuses on how Butler performs in her text this alternative vision of political subjectivity that affirms pluralization as a normative principle. By studying Butler’s account of her Jewishness as well as textual practices shaping the text, I argue that belonging can become a formative aspect of the critical subject through the acts of norms on one’s body as well as by critical engagement.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
批判性归属:巴特勒分手方式中的同居、多元与批判
本文以朱迪斯·巴特勒的《分道扬镳》为切入点,重新思考作为当代政治主观主义两个方面的批判与归属之间的关系。我认为,对巴特勒来说,批判是由物质主体进行的一种行为。因此,它取决于同居是一种本体论条件。归属感,从与他人共享一个地方的意义上讲,评估了一种肯定的立场——保护多种生命的共同条件的承诺。文章的第一部分将巴特勒的同居和多元理论视为一个框架,在这个框架中,与共享一个位置的其他人的物质关系和具体关系作为批评的条件,而不是限制。我认为,巴特勒的阿伦特社会本体论旨在提供一种不同于当代主观主义形式的政治主体性视野。我进一步认为,为了促进这种政治主体性的愿景,需要将同居详细描述为与周围环境的多层次情感关系。文章的第二部分着重于巴特勒如何在她的文本中表现出这种政治主体性的另类视野,这种视野肯定了多元性是一种规范原则。通过研究巴特勒对她的犹太性的描述以及塑造文本的文本实践,我认为归属感可以通过身体上的规范行为和批判性参与成为批判性主体的一个形成方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Redescriptions
Redescriptions Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊最新文献
On Lithoconcepts: A Critical Contribution to the Discussions about the Study of Concepts Insults in the European Parliament: Between Self-Rationalisation and Intercultural Turbulence Fostering Feminist Politics of Veganism: On ‘the Political’ in Donna Haraway’s Approach to Food, Eating and Animals Book Review: To the Uttermost Parts of the Earth: Legal Imagination and International Power, 1300–1870 by Martti Koskenniemi, Cambridge University Press, 2021, 1125 pages. ISBN: 978-0521-76859-7 (hardback), ISBN: 978-0521-74534-5 (paperback) An Apocalyptic Speech Outlining a Theory of Dictatorship: Carl Schmitt Inspired by Juan Donoso Cortés
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1