Soil CO2 efflux dynamics in an integrated crop–livestock system

Kacey D. Aukema, Marcelo O. Wallau, Derek R. Faust, David W. Archer, John R. Hendrickson, Scott L. Kronberg, Mark A. Liebig
{"title":"Soil CO2 efflux dynamics in an integrated crop–livestock system","authors":"Kacey D. Aukema,&nbsp;Marcelo O. Wallau,&nbsp;Derek R. Faust,&nbsp;David W. Archer,&nbsp;John R. Hendrickson,&nbsp;Scott L. Kronberg,&nbsp;Mark A. Liebig","doi":"10.1002/saj2.20546","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Integrated crop–livestock (ICL) systems have shown potential to provide a variety of environmental benefits including soil carbon (C) increases relative to conventional row cropping systems. However, studies documenting C dynamics of ICL systems in the northern Great Plains are lacking relative to other agroecosystems. Soil carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) efflux, crop biomass, and soil organic matter (SOM) pools were monitored over 3 years in an ICL rotation (corn [<i>Zea mays</i> L.]/soybean [<i>Glycine max</i> L.]–spring wheat [<i>Triticum aestivum</i> L.] + cover crop–cover crop) with fall grazing, a conventional cropping system rotation (corn–spring wheat–soybean) and fall grazed and ungrazed mixed-grass pasture near Mandan, ND. Cropped treatments were under no-till management. Annual aboveground crop residue biomass C was similar in the ICL and conventional systems, while less in the grazed pasture (4.18, 3.83, and 1.21 Mg C ha<sup>−1</sup> year<sup>−1</sup> respectively; <i>p</i> = 0.039). Annual soil CO<sub>2</sub> efflux was greater in the ICL, grazed, and ungrazed pasture systems than the conventional system (8.05, 8.73, 8.25, and 5.81 Mg C ha<sup>−1</sup> year<sup>−1</sup>, respectively; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Among crop phases in the ICL and conventional cropping systems, cover crops contributed to greater CO<sub>2</sub> efflux in the spring and fall. SOM and C mineralization were greater at 0–5 cm in the ICL system compared to the conventional cropping system (6.6% vs. 6.3%, <i>p</i> = 0.028 and 248 vs. 184 mg CO<sub>2</sub>–C kg<sup>−1</sup>, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001, respectively). Interseeded cover crops in ICL systems can contribute increased root respiration and enhanced SOM pools relative to conventional cropping systems under semiarid conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":101043,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings - Soil Science Society of America","volume":"87 4","pages":"948-962"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/saj2.20546","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings - Soil Science Society of America","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/saj2.20546","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Integrated crop–livestock (ICL) systems have shown potential to provide a variety of environmental benefits including soil carbon (C) increases relative to conventional row cropping systems. However, studies documenting C dynamics of ICL systems in the northern Great Plains are lacking relative to other agroecosystems. Soil carbon dioxide (CO2) efflux, crop biomass, and soil organic matter (SOM) pools were monitored over 3 years in an ICL rotation (corn [Zea mays L.]/soybean [Glycine max L.]–spring wheat [Triticum aestivum L.] + cover crop–cover crop) with fall grazing, a conventional cropping system rotation (corn–spring wheat–soybean) and fall grazed and ungrazed mixed-grass pasture near Mandan, ND. Cropped treatments were under no-till management. Annual aboveground crop residue biomass C was similar in the ICL and conventional systems, while less in the grazed pasture (4.18, 3.83, and 1.21 Mg C ha−1 year−1 respectively; p = 0.039). Annual soil CO2 efflux was greater in the ICL, grazed, and ungrazed pasture systems than the conventional system (8.05, 8.73, 8.25, and 5.81 Mg C ha−1 year−1, respectively; p < 0.001). Among crop phases in the ICL and conventional cropping systems, cover crops contributed to greater CO2 efflux in the spring and fall. SOM and C mineralization were greater at 0–5 cm in the ICL system compared to the conventional cropping system (6.6% vs. 6.3%, p = 0.028 and 248 vs. 184 mg CO2–C kg−1, p < 0.001, respectively). Interseeded cover crops in ICL systems can contribute increased root respiration and enhanced SOM pools relative to conventional cropping systems under semiarid conditions.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
作物-牲畜综合系统中土壤co2外排动力学
作物-牲畜一体化(ICL)系统已经显示出提供各种环境效益的潜力,包括相对于传统行作系统增加土壤碳(C)。然而,与其他农业生态系统相比,大平原北部ICL系统的C动态研究较少。在西北丹州Mandan附近,采用ICL轮作(玉米[Zea mays L.]/大豆[Glycine max L.] -春小麦[Triticum aestivum L.] +覆盖作物-覆盖作物)、常规轮作(玉米-春小麦-大豆)和秋季放牧和未放牧混合草地,对土壤二氧化碳(CO2)外排、作物生物量和土壤有机质(SOM)库进行了3年的监测。作物处理采用免耕管理。ICL系统和常规系统的年地上作物残茬生物量C基本相同,而放牧系统的年地上作物残茬生物量C较少,分别为4.18、3.83和1.21 Mg C ha - 1 year - 1;p = 0.039)。ICL系统、放牧系统和未放牧系统的年土壤CO2通量均大于常规系统(分别为8.05、8.73、8.25和5.81 Mg C ha - 1年);p & lt;0.001)。在ICL和常规种植系统的作物阶段中,覆盖作物在春季和秋季贡献了更大的CO2外排。ICL系统在0-5 cm处的SOM和C矿化高于常规种植系统(6.6%比6.3%,p = 0.028, 248比184 mg CO2-C kg - 1, p <;分别为0.001)。在半干旱条件下,ICL系统中间种覆盖作物与传统种植系统相比,可以增加根系呼吸和增加SOM库。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Soil carbon fraction responses to grazing intensity and texture in a semiarid grassland Investigating plasticity and swelling properties of improved expansive soil designs based on hybrid deep learning optimization for high pay load applications Integrated assessment of potassium speciation in Taiwanese soils using chemical extraction and X-ray absorption spectroscopy Comparison of Laboratory- and field-determined soil water retention curves in a well-aggregated tallgrass prairie soil A Green-Ampt model for muddy water considering air resistance based on the layered assumption
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1