Bumps along the road of the tiny house movement: practitioner notes with critical reflections

IF 1.2 Q2 Social Sciences Australian Planner Pub Date : 2018-10-02 DOI:10.1080/07293682.2019.1634111
S. Alexander, B. Gleeson, T. Coupé, Nick Matyevich, R. Scott, Fred Schultz
{"title":"Bumps along the road of the tiny house movement: practitioner notes with critical reflections","authors":"S. Alexander, B. Gleeson, T. Coupé, Nick Matyevich, R. Scott, Fred Schultz","doi":"10.1080/07293682.2019.1634111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article begins by sharing practical insights and learnings from tiny house builders, highlighting some promising approaches to construction, as well as some challenges faced by the emerging tiny house movement. The article also offers a conceptually driven appraisal of this potentially important new housing form that raises serious questions about planning and urban policy. The aim is to present a grounded review of the tiny house movement, and its wider policy resonances, rooted in an empirical review of current practice. After the empirical practice notes are presented, the article concludes by going beyond building, construction, and regulatory issues and offers some critical reflections on the promise and limitations of the tiny house movement. These intricacies and potential difficulties include frictions with wider housing and urban policies in Australia, especially those that have favoured transition to higher residential densities and which are themselves fraught with challenges especially around social equity. In offering a sympathetic critique of tiny houses and asking some hard questions, this review and analysis seeks to present a richer and fuller understanding of the tiny house movement in a way that helps the movement progress and avoid unnecessary pitfalls.","PeriodicalId":45599,"journal":{"name":"Australian Planner","volume":"55 1","pages":"198 - 208"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/07293682.2019.1634111","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Planner","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07293682.2019.1634111","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article begins by sharing practical insights and learnings from tiny house builders, highlighting some promising approaches to construction, as well as some challenges faced by the emerging tiny house movement. The article also offers a conceptually driven appraisal of this potentially important new housing form that raises serious questions about planning and urban policy. The aim is to present a grounded review of the tiny house movement, and its wider policy resonances, rooted in an empirical review of current practice. After the empirical practice notes are presented, the article concludes by going beyond building, construction, and regulatory issues and offers some critical reflections on the promise and limitations of the tiny house movement. These intricacies and potential difficulties include frictions with wider housing and urban policies in Australia, especially those that have favoured transition to higher residential densities and which are themselves fraught with challenges especially around social equity. In offering a sympathetic critique of tiny houses and asking some hard questions, this review and analysis seeks to present a richer and fuller understanding of the tiny house movement in a way that helps the movement progress and avoid unnecessary pitfalls.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
小房子运动道路上的颠簸:实践者的笔记与批判性反思
摘要本文首先分享了小房子建筑商的实践见解和经验教训,重点介绍了一些有前景的建筑方法,以及新兴的小房子运动所面临的一些挑战。这篇文章还对这种潜在的重要新住房形式进行了概念驱动的评估,这对规划和城市政策提出了严重的问题。其目的是对小房子运动及其更广泛的政策共鸣进行有根据的审查,植根于对当前实践的实证审查。在提供了实证实践说明后,文章最后超越了建筑、施工和监管问题,并对小房子运动的前景和局限性进行了一些批判性思考。这些错综复杂的问题和潜在的困难包括与澳大利亚更广泛的住房和城市政策的摩擦,特别是那些支持向更高居住密度过渡的政策,这些政策本身就充满了挑战,尤其是在社会公平方面。通过对小房子进行同情的批评,并提出一些棘手的问题,这篇综述和分析试图以一种有助于运动进步和避免不必要陷阱的方式,对小房子运动提出更丰富、更全面的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Australian Planner
Australian Planner REGIONAL & URBAN PLANNING-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
期刊最新文献
The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the music industries of Brisbane and an evaluation of the policy response Planning for open space and recreation in new high density areas: a reply to Marriott Practice reflections on the pandemic from South East Queensland Planning with foresight and resilience: the Planning Institute of Australia National Congress in Adelaide 2023 How have South Australian urban planning policies affected Blakeview’s surface temperatures?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1