Professional Development for Associated Faculty: A National Assessment of Available Resources.

Journal, physical therapy education Pub Date : 2023-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-05-10 DOI:10.1097/JTE.0000000000000284
Catherine Bilyeu, Jessica Niski, Michelle Reilly
{"title":"Professional Development for Associated Faculty: A National Assessment of Available Resources.","authors":"Catherine Bilyeu, Jessica Niski, Michelle Reilly","doi":"10.1097/JTE.0000000000000284","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Faculty development has been identified as an important initiative in Doctor of Physical Therapy (DPT) education. However, little is known about opportunities available for associated faculty (AF). These unique educators who make notable contributions to physical therapist education often lack formal preparation for teaching. The purpose of this study was to explore AF development opportunities across physical therapist education programs nationally.</p><p><strong>Review of literature: </strong>Formal faculty development programs have been successful in medical and nursing education programs to enhance educator identity, skill, and retention in both core and clinical faculty. No evidence of faculty development programs for AF in physical therapy education was found in the literature.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>Participants were program directors or identified faculty development leads from CAPTE accredited and in-candidacy physical therapist education programs. Seventy participants completed an anonymous survey and 10 participated in semistructured interviews following the completion of the survey.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A parallel, convergent, mixed methods approach was used to assess the national state of formal AF development opportunities. A survey was developed to assess development opportunities available to AF. Descriptive statistics and Chi square analyses were performed to analyze quantitative data. An instrumental collective case study further explored development opportunities. Deductive and inductive thematic analysis techniques were used to analyze qualitative data from interview transcripts. Quantitative and qualitative approaches were integrated in the data analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Survey data, aligned with interview outcomes, suggest that despite ideologic support for faculty development, low percentages of AF have access to formal development activities, and even fewer are receiving adequate breadth of educational content related to proficiency in their role.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusion: </strong>A lack of formal development opportunities exists for AF. Excellence in DPT education requires deeper development across all levels of faculty, including opportunities tailored specifically to the unique needs and role of AF.</p>","PeriodicalId":91351,"journal":{"name":"Journal, physical therapy education","volume":"37 1","pages":"227-234"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal, physical therapy education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JTE.0000000000000284","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/5/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Faculty development has been identified as an important initiative in Doctor of Physical Therapy (DPT) education. However, little is known about opportunities available for associated faculty (AF). These unique educators who make notable contributions to physical therapist education often lack formal preparation for teaching. The purpose of this study was to explore AF development opportunities across physical therapist education programs nationally.

Review of literature: Formal faculty development programs have been successful in medical and nursing education programs to enhance educator identity, skill, and retention in both core and clinical faculty. No evidence of faculty development programs for AF in physical therapy education was found in the literature.

Subjects: Participants were program directors or identified faculty development leads from CAPTE accredited and in-candidacy physical therapist education programs. Seventy participants completed an anonymous survey and 10 participated in semistructured interviews following the completion of the survey.

Methods: A parallel, convergent, mixed methods approach was used to assess the national state of formal AF development opportunities. A survey was developed to assess development opportunities available to AF. Descriptive statistics and Chi square analyses were performed to analyze quantitative data. An instrumental collective case study further explored development opportunities. Deductive and inductive thematic analysis techniques were used to analyze qualitative data from interview transcripts. Quantitative and qualitative approaches were integrated in the data analysis.

Results: Survey data, aligned with interview outcomes, suggest that despite ideologic support for faculty development, low percentages of AF have access to formal development activities, and even fewer are receiving adequate breadth of educational content related to proficiency in their role.

Discussion and conclusion: A lack of formal development opportunities exists for AF. Excellence in DPT education requires deeper development across all levels of faculty, including opportunities tailored specifically to the unique needs and role of AF.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
联合教师的专业发展:可用资源的国家评估
补充数字内容可在文本中获得。介绍。师资队伍的发展已被确定为物理治疗博士(DPT)教育的重要举措。然而,对联合教员(AF)的机会知之甚少。这些独特的教育家对物理治疗师教育做出了显著的贡献,但他们往往缺乏正式的教学准备。本研究的目的是探讨全国物理治疗师教育项目中房颤发展的机会。文献回顾。正式的教师发展计划在医学和护理教育项目中取得了成功,提高了教育工作者的身份、技能,并留住了核心和临床教师。在文献中没有发现AF在物理治疗教育中的教师发展计划的证据。科目。参与者是CAPTE认证和候选物理治疗师教育项目的项目主管或确定的教师发展领导。70名参与者完成了一项匿名调查,10名参与者在调查结束后参加了半结构化访谈。方法。采用平行、收敛、混合方法来评估国家正式AF发展机会的状况。开展了一项调查,以评估房颤的发展机会。采用描述性统计和卡方分析来分析定量数据。一个有用的集体案例研究进一步探讨了发展机会。运用演绎和归纳主题分析技术分析访谈笔录中的定性数据。在数据分析中采用了定量和定性相结合的方法。结果。调查数据与访谈结果一致,表明尽管对教师发展的意识形态支持,但有机会参加正式发展活动的AF比例很低,甚至更少的AF接受了与他们的角色熟练程度相关的足够广度的教育内容。讨论与结论。AF缺乏正式的发展机会。卓越的DPT教育需要各级教师进行更深入的发展,包括针对AF的独特需求和角色量身定制的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Assessment of Gender Differences in Letters of Recommendation for Physical Therapy Residency Applications. Do We Make a Difference? The Effect of a Doctor of Physical Therapy Program Curriculum on Student Cultural Competence. Student Pedagogical Consultants: A Strategy for Increasing Diversity, Equity, Inclusivity, and a Sense of Belonging in Curricular Approaches in Physical Therapist Education. Influencing Physical Therapist's Self-efficacy for Musculoskeletal Ultrasound Through Blended Learning: A Mixed Methods Study. A Continuous Quality Improvement Framework for Sustainable Action and Advancement of Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Belonging in Physical Therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1