The Three Languages of School Choice: A Narrative Policy Framework Toward Better Conversations About Education Freedom

Q2 Social Sciences Journal of School Choice Pub Date : 2023-07-03 DOI:10.1080/15582159.2023.2233323
John M. Kristof
{"title":"The Three Languages of School Choice: A Narrative Policy Framework Toward Better Conversations About Education Freedom","authors":"John M. Kristof","doi":"10.1080/15582159.2023.2233323","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Discourse around school choice often is divisive. Less understood is the effect polarization has within advocate groups. The Narrative Policy Framework (NPF) approach offers a systematic approach to understanding how political actors use narratives to affect policy debates. Because NPF assumes bounded relativity, the approach requires a theory of political ideology that can explain why narratives stick within certain ideological boundaries. Because Kling’s three-axes model provides non-mutually exclusive character identification, it can help illuminate in-group overlap and conflict. This essay uses NPF and Kling to examine how narratives are used by various subgroups within the school choice advocacy coalition.","PeriodicalId":34913,"journal":{"name":"Journal of School Choice","volume":"17 1","pages":"352 - 372"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of School Choice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15582159.2023.2233323","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Discourse around school choice often is divisive. Less understood is the effect polarization has within advocate groups. The Narrative Policy Framework (NPF) approach offers a systematic approach to understanding how political actors use narratives to affect policy debates. Because NPF assumes bounded relativity, the approach requires a theory of political ideology that can explain why narratives stick within certain ideological boundaries. Because Kling’s three-axes model provides non-mutually exclusive character identification, it can help illuminate in-group overlap and conflict. This essay uses NPF and Kling to examine how narratives are used by various subgroups within the school choice advocacy coalition.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学校选择的三种语言:一个更好地谈论教育自由的叙事政策框架
关于择校的讨论常常引起分歧。不太为人所知的是两极化在倡导团体内部产生的影响。叙事政策框架(NPF)方法提供了一种系统的方法来理解政治行为者如何利用叙事来影响政策辩论。由于NPF假设了有界相对性,这种方法需要一种政治意识形态理论来解释为什么叙事会停留在特定的意识形态边界内。由于Kling的三轴模型提供了非互斥的字符识别,它可以帮助阐明群体重叠和冲突。本文使用NPF和Kling来研究择校倡导联盟中的各个小组是如何使用叙事的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of School Choice
Journal of School Choice Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
期刊最新文献
Exploring Information Gathering Work Undertaken by Immigrant Parents to Choose a High School in Montreal Thirty Years of Charter Schools: What Does Lottery-Based Research Tell Us? Academies in England and Charter Schools in the US: Who Is Accountable, to Whom, for What, and with What Consequences? The Father of the School Choice Movement Thomas Paine, John Stuart Mill, and the School Choice Movement’s Normative Roots
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1