Partners or Predators? A Corpus-Based Study of China’s Image in South African Media

IF 1.1 3区 文学 Q3 COMMUNICATION African Journalism Studies Pub Date : 2021-05-12 DOI:10.1080/23743670.2021.1913428
Changpeng Huan, Menghan Deng
{"title":"Partners or Predators? A Corpus-Based Study of China’s Image in South African Media","authors":"Changpeng Huan, Menghan Deng","doi":"10.1080/23743670.2021.1913428","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article sets out to investigate the image of China in South Africa’s mainstream English-language newspapers in the context of changing dynamics of Sino-SA bilateral relations, and their respective growing ambitions. To do so, this research adopts a corpus-based method to examine discursive mechanism through which China is represented in South African media. Corpus findings transcend the traditional and often oversimplified dichotomy of partner or predator, and recognise the complexities, contradictions, and changing dynamics of Sino-SA relation. Despite increasingly converging visions on matters of continental and global import, chief challenges faced by these two countries are contested interests over issues of BRICS versus African Agenda, weak bilateral political and public trust, and responsible versus irresponsible China. The findings are discussed in relation to China’s pursuit of soft power and SA’s geopolitical ambitions.","PeriodicalId":54049,"journal":{"name":"African Journalism Studies","volume":"42 1","pages":"34 - 50"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/23743670.2021.1913428","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Journalism Studies","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23743670.2021.1913428","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article sets out to investigate the image of China in South Africa’s mainstream English-language newspapers in the context of changing dynamics of Sino-SA bilateral relations, and their respective growing ambitions. To do so, this research adopts a corpus-based method to examine discursive mechanism through which China is represented in South African media. Corpus findings transcend the traditional and often oversimplified dichotomy of partner or predator, and recognise the complexities, contradictions, and changing dynamics of Sino-SA relation. Despite increasingly converging visions on matters of continental and global import, chief challenges faced by these two countries are contested interests over issues of BRICS versus African Agenda, weak bilateral political and public trust, and responsible versus irresponsible China. The findings are discussed in relation to China’s pursuit of soft power and SA’s geopolitical ambitions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
伙伴还是捕食者?基于语料库的南非媒体中国形象研究
摘要本文旨在探讨在中萨双边关系动态变化的背景下,南非主流英文报纸上的中国形象,以及它们各自日益增长的雄心。为此,本研究采用基于语料库的方法来考察中国在南非媒体中的话语机制。语料库的发现超越了传统的、经常过于简单化的伴侣或捕食者的二分法,并认识到了中美关系的复杂性、矛盾性和不断变化的动态。尽管在大陆和全球重要性问题上的观点越来越一致,但这两个国家面临的主要挑战是在金砖国家与非洲议程、双边政治和公众信任薄弱以及负责任与不负责任的中国等问题上存在利益争议。研究结果与中国对软实力的追求和南非的地缘政治野心有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
10.00%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: Accredited by the South African Department of Higher Education and Training for university research purposes African Journalism Studies subscribes to the Code of Best Practice for Peer Reviewed Scholarly Journals of the Academy of Science of South Africa. African Journalism Studies ( AJS) aims to contribute to the ongoing extension of the theories, methodologies and empirical data to under-researched areas of knowledge production, through its emphasis on African journalism studies within a broader, comparative perspective of the Global South. AJS strives for theoretical diversity and methodological inclusivity, by developing theoretical approaches and making critical interventions in global scholarly debates. The journal''s comparative and interdisciplinary approach is informed by the related fields of cultural and media studies, communication studies, African studies, politics, and sociology. The field of journalism studies is understood broadly, as including the practices, norms, value systems, frameworks of representation, audiences, platforms, industries, theories and power relations that relate to the production, consumption and study of journalism. A wide definition of journalism is used, which extends beyond news and current affairs to include digital and social media, documentary film and narrative non-fiction.
期刊最新文献
Climate Justice and Other News Frames in the Coverage of Climate Change in Kenya, Nigeria, and South Africa Analysing Discourse-Stylistics on Peripheral Journalism Platforms: A Context of Indigenous Language News Outlets on Facebook Network Flow of Campaign Discourses and News Frames: The Changing Fortunes of Twitter/X as a Conduit for Frame-Building Public Support for Local and Community Media in Three Countries: A Comparative Study Reimagining Through Crisis: How the Covid-19 Pandemic Changed the Fortunes and Futures of Journalism Schools and Graduates
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1