Discriminating between nesting and non-nesting habitat in a vulnerable bird species: implications for behavioural ecology

Q3 Environmental Science European Journal of Ecology Pub Date : 2019-01-01 DOI:10.2478/eje-2019-0003
S. Hanane
{"title":"Discriminating between nesting and non-nesting habitat in a vulnerable bird species: implications for behavioural ecology","authors":"S. Hanane","doi":"10.2478/eje-2019-0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Nowadays, partitioning amongst nesting and non-nesting habitats is not much studied. Here, I investigate whether or not the turtle dove (Streptopelia turtur) nesting habitats overlap with those used for other purposes in a North African agroforestry system. A total of 33 nest points and 33 turtle dove presence points were considered. The study, conducted in May to June 2017, attempted to determine the factors that may play a role in discriminating between the nesting habitats and non-nesting habitats. I used a linear discriminant analysis (LDA) to test the relevance of proximity of food resources, forest edge and human presence variables in the distribution of the species. The results show substantial segregation in the habitats selected for nesting and those selected for other uses [average distance was 1129.69 ± 169.40 m (n = 66) with a maximum of 1518.6 m and a minimum of 617.72 m], with selection depending primarily on the proximity to forest edge and feeding areas. I discuss these findings and their implications on behavioural ecology and future researches of this vulnerable species. I suggest guidelines for future studies that will seek to better understand the behavioural dynamics of turtle doves in the Mediterranean agroforestry systems. This can only be done when disturbance covariates, such as: (i) forest logging, (ii) cereal harvesting and (iii) hunting and predation pressures, were imperatively taken into account.","PeriodicalId":37280,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Ecology","volume":"5 1","pages":"15 - 22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/eje-2019-0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Abstract Nowadays, partitioning amongst nesting and non-nesting habitats is not much studied. Here, I investigate whether or not the turtle dove (Streptopelia turtur) nesting habitats overlap with those used for other purposes in a North African agroforestry system. A total of 33 nest points and 33 turtle dove presence points were considered. The study, conducted in May to June 2017, attempted to determine the factors that may play a role in discriminating between the nesting habitats and non-nesting habitats. I used a linear discriminant analysis (LDA) to test the relevance of proximity of food resources, forest edge and human presence variables in the distribution of the species. The results show substantial segregation in the habitats selected for nesting and those selected for other uses [average distance was 1129.69 ± 169.40 m (n = 66) with a maximum of 1518.6 m and a minimum of 617.72 m], with selection depending primarily on the proximity to forest edge and feeding areas. I discuss these findings and their implications on behavioural ecology and future researches of this vulnerable species. I suggest guidelines for future studies that will seek to better understand the behavioural dynamics of turtle doves in the Mediterranean agroforestry systems. This can only be done when disturbance covariates, such as: (i) forest logging, (ii) cereal harvesting and (iii) hunting and predation pressures, were imperatively taken into account.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一种脆弱鸟类筑巢和非筑巢栖息地的区分:对行为生态学的影响
目前,对筑巢和非筑巢栖息地的划分研究并不多。在这里,我调查了斑鸠(Streptopelia turtur)筑巢栖息地是否与北非农林业系统中用于其他目的的栖息地重叠。总共考虑了33个巢点和33个斑鸠存在点。该研究于2017年5月至6月进行,试图确定可能在区分筑巢栖息地和非筑巢栖息地方面发挥作用的因素。我使用线性判别分析(LDA)来测试食物资源,森林边缘和人类存在变量在物种分布中的相关性。结果表明,筑巢生境与其他用途生境存在明显的隔离[平均距离为1129.69±169.40 m (n = 66),最大值为1518.6 m,最小值为617.72 m],选择主要取决于靠近森林边缘和觅食区。我将讨论这些发现及其对行为生态学和未来研究这一脆弱物种的影响。我建议为今后的研究提供指导方针,以便更好地了解地中海农林系统中斑鸠的行为动态。只有当干扰协变量,如:(i)森林采伐,(ii)谷物收获和(iii)狩猎和捕食压力必须考虑在内时,才能做到这一点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Ecology
European Journal of Ecology Environmental Science-Ecology
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Data of bioaccumulation and biomagnification from soil in biota nettle-snail (Urtica dioica, L and Helix pomatia,L) of heavy metal (Pb, Zn, Ni) pollution of mining activity in Mitrovica. Hiding behaviour of bats in sandstone mines of North-Eastern Ukraine Geospatial Analysis For Determination Of Preferential Soil Conditions For The Desert Locust Oviposition Characterization of Anopheles funestus Larval Habitats in Fiyoni, Kwale County, Kenya: Insights into Malaria Vector Ecology and Control EFFECTS OF HUMAN DISTURBANCES ON THE SEED DISPERSAL BY BATS COMMUNITIES ON THE ANDEAN CHOCÓ
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1