Opinions of gastroenterologists about intestinal microbiota modulating agents: results of the survey in focus groups

O. Golovenko, A. O. Golovenko
{"title":"Opinions of gastroenterologists about intestinal microbiota modulating agents: results of the survey in focus groups","authors":"O. Golovenko, A. O. Golovenko","doi":"10.26442/20751753.2023.5.202250","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim. To study the opinions of gastroenterologists about drugs affecting the intestinal microflora. \nMaterials and methods. A qualitative survey was conducted in focus groups to study the patterns of prescribing drugs that regulate intestinal microflora in chronic gastrointestinal diseases. The survey included only outpatient gastroenterologists who managed patients with irritable bowel syndrome, an uncomplicated diverticular disease with clinical manifestations and excessive bacterial growth in the small intestine for at least 3 years. \nResults. Physicians perceive the non-absorbable antibiotic rifaximin alpha as the drug of choice for treating these diseases; they are aware of its low bioavailability and suitability for repeated use. However, with severe clinical symptoms, some doctors tend to use systemic antibiotics before infectious or inflammatory complications are confirmed. It is due to the erroneous perception of systemic antibiotics as obviously more effective drugs than non-absorbable antibiotics. When choosing a drug, it is essential to consider the risk of antibiotic-associated diarrhea, adverse changes in the microflora, and the patient's comorbidities. \nConclusion. Surveyed gastroenterologists consider rifaximin alfa (Alfa Normix) the most suitable drug that helps in routine practice achieve the desired result with a minimum risk of adverse events. Many study participants are skeptical about the effect of probiotics due to the lack of evidence but emphasize their safety and the request for probiotics from patients. Not all doctors are aware of metabiotics. Prebiotics and dietary fibers are perceived as agents that affect both the intestinal microflora and the stool frequency. Some healthcare professionals are concerned about prebiotics and probiotics registered as dietary supplements, which can cause patient misunderstandings. Identified opinions about such agents can be used in training gastroenterologists and developing clinical guidelines.","PeriodicalId":10550,"journal":{"name":"Consilium Medicum","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Consilium Medicum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26442/20751753.2023.5.202250","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim. To study the opinions of gastroenterologists about drugs affecting the intestinal microflora. Materials and methods. A qualitative survey was conducted in focus groups to study the patterns of prescribing drugs that regulate intestinal microflora in chronic gastrointestinal diseases. The survey included only outpatient gastroenterologists who managed patients with irritable bowel syndrome, an uncomplicated diverticular disease with clinical manifestations and excessive bacterial growth in the small intestine for at least 3 years. Results. Physicians perceive the non-absorbable antibiotic rifaximin alpha as the drug of choice for treating these diseases; they are aware of its low bioavailability and suitability for repeated use. However, with severe clinical symptoms, some doctors tend to use systemic antibiotics before infectious or inflammatory complications are confirmed. It is due to the erroneous perception of systemic antibiotics as obviously more effective drugs than non-absorbable antibiotics. When choosing a drug, it is essential to consider the risk of antibiotic-associated diarrhea, adverse changes in the microflora, and the patient's comorbidities. Conclusion. Surveyed gastroenterologists consider rifaximin alfa (Alfa Normix) the most suitable drug that helps in routine practice achieve the desired result with a minimum risk of adverse events. Many study participants are skeptical about the effect of probiotics due to the lack of evidence but emphasize their safety and the request for probiotics from patients. Not all doctors are aware of metabiotics. Prebiotics and dietary fibers are perceived as agents that affect both the intestinal microflora and the stool frequency. Some healthcare professionals are concerned about prebiotics and probiotics registered as dietary supplements, which can cause patient misunderstandings. Identified opinions about such agents can be used in training gastroenterologists and developing clinical guidelines.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
胃肠病学家对肠道菌群调节剂的看法:焦点小组调查结果
的目标。目的:了解消化科医师对药物影响肠道菌群的看法。材料和方法。在焦点小组中进行定性调查,研究慢性胃肠道疾病中调节肠道菌群的药物处方模式。该调查仅包括治疗肠易激综合征患者的门诊胃肠病学家,肠易激综合征是一种无并发症的憩室疾病,有临床表现,小肠内细菌过度生长至少3年。结果。医生认为不可吸收的利福昔明是治疗这些疾病的首选药物;他们意识到它的生物利用度低,适合重复使用。然而,由于临床症状严重,一些医生倾向于在确认感染或炎症并发症之前使用全身性抗生素。这是因为人们错误地认为全身性抗生素明显比不可吸收性抗生素更有效。在选择药物时,必须考虑抗生素相关性腹泻的风险、微生物群的不良变化以及患者的合并症。结论。接受调查的胃肠病学家认为利福昔明(alfa Normix)是最合适的药物,有助于在常规实践中达到预期的结果,并将不良事件的风险降到最低。由于缺乏证据,许多研究参与者对益生菌的效果持怀疑态度,但强调其安全性和患者对益生菌的要求。并不是所有的医生都知道代谢物。益生元和膳食纤维被认为是影响肠道菌群和大便频率的药物。一些医疗保健专业人员担心益生元和益生菌注册为膳食补充剂,这可能会引起患者的误解。关于这些药物的明确意见可用于培训胃肠病学家和制定临床指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
63
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Possibilities of noninvasive diagnostics of cardiovascular diseases associated with atherosclerosis Clinical case of mechanical and non-mechanical rhabdomyolysis complicated by acute kidney injury. Case report Hyperuricemia and acute decompensation of heart failure: is there a causative link? A review Extralobar pulmonary sequestration in an adult male with a heart defect. Case report Atherosclerosis and inflammation: Current therapeutic strategies. A review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1