Enhanced recovery after colorectal surgery: 1st year experience in a safety-net hospital

Stephanie D. Talutis, U. Phatak, Angela H. Kuhnen, P. Rosenkranz, D. McAneny, J. Hall
{"title":"Enhanced recovery after colorectal surgery: 1st year experience in a safety-net hospital","authors":"Stephanie D. Talutis, U. Phatak, Angela H. Kuhnen, P. Rosenkranz, D. McAneny, J. Hall","doi":"10.4103/wjcs.wjcs_7_20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is a multidisciplinary pathway of perioperative patient care. Objective: To evaluate the effect of an ERAS program on length-of-stay (LOS) among elective colorectal surgery patients at a safety-net hospital. Design: Retrospective chart review Setting: 500+ bed in a safety-net hospital. Patients and Methods: Retrospective review of elective colorectal surgery patients comparing those participating in an ERAS protocol to historical-control (HC) patients from the preceding year. Main Outcome Measures: The primary outcome was LOS. Secondary outcomes of interest included opioid utilization, fluid balance throughout the hospital stay, return of bowel function, 30-day complications emergency department visits, and readmissions. Sample Size: 193. Results: ERAS (n = 94) and HC groups (n = 99) were similar with regards to demographics and operations performed. ERAS patients had a longer operating room (OR) time (P = 0.010), however, OR fluid rates were lower for ERAS patients (P < 0.001) with more neutral fluid balance at discharge (closer to 0) (P = 0.006). ERAS patients received fewer opioids in the OR (P < 0.001) and throughout the hospital stay (P = 0.043). Median LOS was 4 days for both groups (P = 0.141) and no difference in 30-day emergency department (ED) visits, readmission, or complications. Conclusions: Benefits of ERAS may not be immediately evident post-implementation. Further study is needed regarding the maintenance of ERAS interventions over time and the impact on patient outcomes. Limitations: Single-center retrospective nature and surgeon turnover during this period. Conflict of Interest: None.","PeriodicalId":90396,"journal":{"name":"World journal of colorectal surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World journal of colorectal surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/wjcs.wjcs_7_20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is a multidisciplinary pathway of perioperative patient care. Objective: To evaluate the effect of an ERAS program on length-of-stay (LOS) among elective colorectal surgery patients at a safety-net hospital. Design: Retrospective chart review Setting: 500+ bed in a safety-net hospital. Patients and Methods: Retrospective review of elective colorectal surgery patients comparing those participating in an ERAS protocol to historical-control (HC) patients from the preceding year. Main Outcome Measures: The primary outcome was LOS. Secondary outcomes of interest included opioid utilization, fluid balance throughout the hospital stay, return of bowel function, 30-day complications emergency department visits, and readmissions. Sample Size: 193. Results: ERAS (n = 94) and HC groups (n = 99) were similar with regards to demographics and operations performed. ERAS patients had a longer operating room (OR) time (P = 0.010), however, OR fluid rates were lower for ERAS patients (P < 0.001) with more neutral fluid balance at discharge (closer to 0) (P = 0.006). ERAS patients received fewer opioids in the OR (P < 0.001) and throughout the hospital stay (P = 0.043). Median LOS was 4 days for both groups (P = 0.141) and no difference in 30-day emergency department (ED) visits, readmission, or complications. Conclusions: Benefits of ERAS may not be immediately evident post-implementation. Further study is needed regarding the maintenance of ERAS interventions over time and the impact on patient outcomes. Limitations: Single-center retrospective nature and surgeon turnover during this period. Conflict of Interest: None.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
结直肠手术后的强化恢复:在安全网医院的一年经验
背景:术后增强恢复(ERAS)是围手术期患者护理的多学科途径。目的:评价ERAS对某安全网医院择期结直肠手术患者住院时间(LOS)的影响。设计:回顾性图表回顾设置:某安全网医院500余张床位。患者和方法:回顾性分析选择性结直肠手术患者,比较参加ERAS方案的患者和前一年的历史对照(HC)患者。主要观察指标:主要观察指标为LOS。次要结局包括阿片类药物使用、整个住院期间的体液平衡、肠道功能恢复、30天并发症、急诊就诊和再入院。样本量:193。结果:ERAS组(n = 94)和HC组(n = 99)在人口统计学和手术方面相似。ERAS患者的手术室(OR)时间较长(P = 0.010),但ERAS患者的手术室(OR)率较低(P < 0.001),出院时液体平衡更中性(接近于0)(P = 0.006)。ERAS患者在手术室(P < 0.001)和整个住院期间(P = 0.043)接受的阿片类药物较少。两组的平均生存时间为4天(P = 0.141), 30天急诊科(ED)就诊、再入院或并发症无差异。结论:ERAS的益处在实施后可能不会立即显现。随着时间的推移,ERAS干预措施的维持及其对患者预后的影响需要进一步的研究。局限性:在此期间,单中心回顾性和外科医生更换。利益冲突:无。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Real-time artificial intelligence-assisted colonoscopy and the effect of endoscopist experience on polyp detection rates at a tertiary referral center A case of acute intestinal obstruction in an infant during the COVID-19 pandemic Anal pruritus: Diagnosis and management Charity colonoscopy event and fund in Singapore: A Novel Method to Raise Awareness of Colorectal Cancer Screening The structural relationships between quality of life and mental conditions in stoma patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1