‘That hour served me better than any hour I have ever had before’: Service users’ experiences of CBTp in first episode psychosis

Pawel D. Mankiewicz, J. O'Leary, Olivia Collier
{"title":"‘That hour served me better than any hour I have ever had before’: Service users’ experiences of CBTp in first episode psychosis","authors":"Pawel D. Mankiewicz, J. O'Leary, Olivia Collier","doi":"10.53841/bpscpr.2018.33.2.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite an emerging number of studies investigating service users’ experiences of receiving cognitive behavioural therapy for psychosis (CBTp), no studies to date have focused on individuals with first episode psychosis (FEP). Available research in FEP indicates that young people may delay seeking professional help due to having negative expectations of therapy and upholding unhelpful attitudes toward such treatment, which delays uptake to early intervention in psychosis (EIP) services in the NHS. The present study attempts to address the apparent gap in existing knowledge and explores expectations and experiences of receiving CBTp among EIP clients with FEP.Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with nine participants with FEP who had received CBTp in a London-based EIP. Researchers had the flexibility to focus on the identified areas of service user experience and explored their reflections on the received therapy. Questions related to prior expectations and the actual experience of participating in such therapeutic treatment.Interviews were analysed using thematic analysis. Four major themes emerged, including: service user’s prior expectations; therapeutic alliance; challenges of CBTp; and application of CBTp to achieve change.Although some negative assumptions preceded the commencement of therapy, optimistic expectations were also voiced. Overall, participants reported largely positive experiences of receiving CBTp in relation to both the process of treatment and qualities demonstrated by their therapists, despite experiencing some challenges related to achieving change. Central importance of functional therapeutic alliance in CBTp was indicated, based on which major therapeutic gains were achieved, even in spite of, at times, pre-existing worrisome expectations.","PeriodicalId":36758,"journal":{"name":"Counselling Psychology Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Counselling Psychology Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53841/bpscpr.2018.33.2.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Despite an emerging number of studies investigating service users’ experiences of receiving cognitive behavioural therapy for psychosis (CBTp), no studies to date have focused on individuals with first episode psychosis (FEP). Available research in FEP indicates that young people may delay seeking professional help due to having negative expectations of therapy and upholding unhelpful attitudes toward such treatment, which delays uptake to early intervention in psychosis (EIP) services in the NHS. The present study attempts to address the apparent gap in existing knowledge and explores expectations and experiences of receiving CBTp among EIP clients with FEP.Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with nine participants with FEP who had received CBTp in a London-based EIP. Researchers had the flexibility to focus on the identified areas of service user experience and explored their reflections on the received therapy. Questions related to prior expectations and the actual experience of participating in such therapeutic treatment.Interviews were analysed using thematic analysis. Four major themes emerged, including: service user’s prior expectations; therapeutic alliance; challenges of CBTp; and application of CBTp to achieve change.Although some negative assumptions preceded the commencement of therapy, optimistic expectations were also voiced. Overall, participants reported largely positive experiences of receiving CBTp in relation to both the process of treatment and qualities demonstrated by their therapists, despite experiencing some challenges related to achieving change. Central importance of functional therapeutic alliance in CBTp was indicated, based on which major therapeutic gains were achieved, even in spite of, at times, pre-existing worrisome expectations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“那一个小时比我以前任何一个小时都更好”:服务使用者在首发精神病患者中使用CBTp的经历
尽管越来越多的研究调查了服务使用者接受精神病认知行为疗法(CBTp)的经历,但迄今为止,没有任何研究关注首次发作精神病(FEP)患者。FEP的现有研究表明,年轻人可能会因为对治疗抱有负面期望和对此类治疗持无益态度而推迟寻求专业帮助,这会推迟NHS对精神病(EIP)服务的早期干预。本研究试图解决现有知识中的明显差距,并探讨了FEP EIP客户对接受CBTp的期望和体验。对9名在伦敦EIP接受过CBTp的FEP参与者进行了半结构定性访谈。研究人员可以灵活地关注服务用户体验的特定领域,并探索他们对所接受治疗的反思。与先前的期望和参与此类治疗的实际经验有关的问题。访谈采用专题分析法进行分析。出现了四个主要主题,包括:服务用户先前的期望;治疗联盟;CBTp的挑战;以及CBTp的应用来实现改变。尽管在开始治疗之前有一些负面的假设,但也表达了乐观的期望。总体而言,参与者报告了接受CBTp的基本积极体验,涉及治疗过程和治疗师表现出的素质,尽管他们在实现改变方面遇到了一些挑战。指出了功能性治疗联盟在CBTp中的核心重要性,在此基础上取得了重大的治疗成果,尽管有时存在着令人担忧的预期。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Counselling Psychology Review
Counselling Psychology Review Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Mental health difficulties in paramedics: A review of the literature Structural Existential Analysis (SEA) – A step-by-step guide for application to research Supervising trainee counselling psychologists of colour in doctoral research: A theoretical review and practice implications ‘You can’t live like I did and grow up normal’: An IPA study of how men diagnosed with borderline personality disorder (BPD) experienced their early childhood The impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on self-efficacy in Assistant Psychologists in the UK
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1