Emergency Focused Assessment with Sonography in Blunt Trauma Abdomen

IF 0.8 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL International Journal of Applied and Basic Medical Research Pub Date : 2019-10-01 DOI:10.4103/ijabmr.IJABMR_273_19
Shradha Engles, N. Saini, S. Rathore
{"title":"Emergency Focused Assessment with Sonography in Blunt Trauma Abdomen","authors":"Shradha Engles, N. Saini, S. Rathore","doi":"10.4103/ijabmr.IJABMR_273_19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Focused assessment with sonography in trauma (FAST) being a rapid noninvasive examination is used primarily to evaluate for the evidence of traumatic free fluid suggestive of injury in the peritoneal, pericardial, and pleural cavities. It is widely recognized as a mainstream emergency skill in the management of trauma. Aim: The aim of the study is to evaluate the accuracy of FAST in patients presenting with blunt abdominal trauma. Methods: Data were collected prospectively from FAST scans conducted in blunt trauma abdomen (BTA) patients. Positive and negative FAST scans were confirmed either with contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) abdomen or with exploratory laparotomy, thus dividing it further into four groups, i.e., true-positive, false-positive, true-negative, and false-negative scans. After collecting the data, accuracy of FAST was calculated. Results: In this study, a total of 104 patients were included. The mean age was 38.17 years. Most common cause of BTA was road traffic accident. The overall sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of FAST were 69.8%, 92.1%, and 80.8%, respectively. Conclusion: This study showed that FAST is of paramount importance in patients who are hemodynamically unstable as it has a high positive predictive value. However, a FAST-negative result should always be confirmed by other modalities.","PeriodicalId":13727,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Applied and Basic Medical Research","volume":"9 1","pages":"193 - 196"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Applied and Basic Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijabmr.IJABMR_273_19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Background: Focused assessment with sonography in trauma (FAST) being a rapid noninvasive examination is used primarily to evaluate for the evidence of traumatic free fluid suggestive of injury in the peritoneal, pericardial, and pleural cavities. It is widely recognized as a mainstream emergency skill in the management of trauma. Aim: The aim of the study is to evaluate the accuracy of FAST in patients presenting with blunt abdominal trauma. Methods: Data were collected prospectively from FAST scans conducted in blunt trauma abdomen (BTA) patients. Positive and negative FAST scans were confirmed either with contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) abdomen or with exploratory laparotomy, thus dividing it further into four groups, i.e., true-positive, false-positive, true-negative, and false-negative scans. After collecting the data, accuracy of FAST was calculated. Results: In this study, a total of 104 patients were included. The mean age was 38.17 years. Most common cause of BTA was road traffic accident. The overall sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of FAST were 69.8%, 92.1%, and 80.8%, respectively. Conclusion: This study showed that FAST is of paramount importance in patients who are hemodynamically unstable as it has a high positive predictive value. However, a FAST-negative result should always be confirmed by other modalities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超声对钝性创伤腹部的急救评估
背景:创伤超声聚焦评估(FAST)是一种快速的非侵入性检查,主要用于评估提示腹膜、心包和胸膜腔损伤的创伤游离液的证据。它被广泛认为是创伤管理中的一种主流应急技能。目的:本研究的目的是评估FAST在钝性腹部创伤患者中的准确性。方法:前瞻性收集腹部钝性创伤(BTA)患者FAST扫描的数据。通过腹部对比增强计算机断层扫描(CECT)或剖腹探查术确认FAST扫描的阳性和阴性,从而将其进一步分为四组,即真阳性、假阳性、真阴性和假阴性扫描。在收集数据后,计算FAST的准确性。结果:本研究共纳入104例患者。平均年龄38.17岁。BTA最常见的原因是道路交通事故。FAST的总体敏感性、特异性和准确性分别为69.8%、92.1%和80.8%。结论:本研究表明,FAST对血液动力学不稳定的患者具有重要意义,因为它具有很高的阳性预测价值。但是,FAST的阴性结果应始终通过其他方式进行确认。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
期刊最新文献
A Giant Basal-Cell Carcinoma: A Rare Subtype at a Rare Site. Aberrant Right Coronary Artery from the Left Coronary Sinus Presenting with Inferior Wall Myocardial Infarction. Assessing the Safety of a Novel Monoclonal Antibody Cocktail for Postexposure Prophylaxis in Category III Animal Exposures. Calculation of Attendance of Faculty Working in Indian Medical Colleges: Looking for the Denominator. Correlation of Follicle-stimulating Hormone, Anti-Mullerian Hormone, and Antral Follicle Count with Age in Ovarian Reserve Testing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1