Defining Quality in Undergraduate Education: Directions for Future Research Informed by a Literature Review.

Q2 Social Sciences Higher Learning Research Communications Pub Date : 2018-01-22 DOI:10.18870/HLRC.V8I1.392
A. Bowers, Shyam Ranganathan, Denise R. Simmons
{"title":"Defining Quality in Undergraduate Education: Directions for Future Research Informed by a Literature Review.","authors":"A. Bowers, Shyam Ranganathan, Denise R. Simmons","doi":"10.18870/HLRC.V8I1.392","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: This research brief explores the literature addressing quality in undergraduate education to identify what previous research has said about quality and to offer future directions for research on quality in undergraduate education. \n \nMethod: We conducted a scoping review to provide a broad overview of existing research. Using targeted search terms in academic databases, we identified and reviewed relevant academic literature to develop emergent themes and implications for future research. \n \nResults: The exploratory review of the literature revealed a range of thoughtful discussions and empirical studies attempting to define quality in undergraduate education. Many publications highlighted the importance of including different stakeholder perspectives and presented some of the varying perceptions of quality among different stakeholders. \n \nConclusions: While a number of researchers have explored and written about how to define quality in undergraduate education, there is not a general consensus regarding a definition of quality in undergraduate education. Past research offers a range of insights, models, and data to inform future research. \n \nImplication for Theory and/or Practice: We provide four recommendations for future research to contribute to a high quality undergraduate educational experience. We suggest more comprehensive systematic reviews of the literature as a next step.","PeriodicalId":37033,"journal":{"name":"Higher Learning Research Communications","volume":"8 1","pages":"51-64"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Higher Learning Research Communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18870/HLRC.V8I1.392","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Objectives: This research brief explores the literature addressing quality in undergraduate education to identify what previous research has said about quality and to offer future directions for research on quality in undergraduate education. Method: We conducted a scoping review to provide a broad overview of existing research. Using targeted search terms in academic databases, we identified and reviewed relevant academic literature to develop emergent themes and implications for future research. Results: The exploratory review of the literature revealed a range of thoughtful discussions and empirical studies attempting to define quality in undergraduate education. Many publications highlighted the importance of including different stakeholder perspectives and presented some of the varying perceptions of quality among different stakeholders. Conclusions: While a number of researchers have explored and written about how to define quality in undergraduate education, there is not a general consensus regarding a definition of quality in undergraduate education. Past research offers a range of insights, models, and data to inform future research. Implication for Theory and/or Practice: We provide four recommendations for future research to contribute to a high quality undergraduate educational experience. We suggest more comprehensive systematic reviews of the literature as a next step.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
定义本科教育的质量:由文献综述提供的未来研究方向。
目的:本研究简要探讨了有关本科教育质量的文献,以确定以前的研究对质量的看法,并为本科教育质量的研究提供未来的方向。方法:我们进行了一项范围综述,以提供现有研究的广泛概述。使用学术数据库中的目标搜索词,我们确定并审查了相关的学术文献,以发展新兴主题和对未来研究的影响。结果:对文献的探索性回顾揭示了一系列试图定义本科教育质量的深思熟虑的讨论和实证研究。许多出版物强调了包括不同利益相关者观点的重要性,并介绍了不同利益相关者对质量的一些不同看法。结论:虽然许多研究人员已经探索并撰写了关于如何定义本科教育质量的文章,但对于本科教育质量的定义并没有达成普遍共识。过去的研究为未来的研究提供了一系列的见解、模型和数据。理论与实践启示:我们为未来的研究提供了四条建议,以促进高质量的本科教育体验。我们建议下一步对文献进行更全面系统的综述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Higher Learning Research Communications
Higher Learning Research Communications Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Relationships between Pedagogical Practices and Affective States for Effective Teaching during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Insights from University Professors Examining Technology Use and Competence of Higher Education Academics During the COVID-19 Pandemic Challenges to Inclusive Education for Students With Disabilities in Japanese Higher Education Institutions Gamification and player profiles among faculty in Mexico Emerging From Content and Language Integrated Learning and English-Medium Instruction, is CLIL-ised EMI the Next Trend of Education?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1