A matter of time? Institutional timescapes and gendered inequalities in the transition from education to employment in Australia

IF 1.4 2区 社会学 Q2 SOCIOLOGY Journal of Sociology Pub Date : 2022-11-15 DOI:10.1177/14407833221135220
L. Craig, Signe Ravn, B. Churchill, M. Valenzuela
{"title":"A matter of time? Institutional timescapes and gendered inequalities in the transition from education to employment in Australia","authors":"L. Craig, Signe Ravn, B. Churchill, M. Valenzuela","doi":"10.1177/14407833221135220","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article explores why women miss out in the transition from the educational system to the labour market. Using nationally representative longitudinal data (2001–18) from the Household Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) survey, we compare how long after graduation it takes men and women with tertiary qualifications (n = 2030) to achieve key labour market milestones: (1) getting a full-time job; (2) getting a permanent contract; (3) earning an average wage; (4) finding a job that matches their skill level. We find significant gender differences in reaching these milestones, confirming that time is a critical dimension for understanding gendered inequalities in the returns to education. We attribute findings to incompatible ‘timescapes’ across the institutions of education, family and employment. The more flexible timescape of education allows women to succeed, but the inflexible timescape of employment (particularly when combined with family responsibilities) impedes them from turning educational achievement into labour market progress.","PeriodicalId":47556,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sociology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sociology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14407833221135220","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article explores why women miss out in the transition from the educational system to the labour market. Using nationally representative longitudinal data (2001–18) from the Household Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) survey, we compare how long after graduation it takes men and women with tertiary qualifications (n = 2030) to achieve key labour market milestones: (1) getting a full-time job; (2) getting a permanent contract; (3) earning an average wage; (4) finding a job that matches their skill level. We find significant gender differences in reaching these milestones, confirming that time is a critical dimension for understanding gendered inequalities in the returns to education. We attribute findings to incompatible ‘timescapes’ across the institutions of education, family and employment. The more flexible timescape of education allows women to succeed, but the inflexible timescape of employment (particularly when combined with family responsibilities) impedes them from turning educational achievement into labour market progress.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
时间问题?澳大利亚从教育向就业过渡过程中的制度时间跨度和性别不平等
这篇文章探讨了女性在从教育系统向劳动力市场的过渡中为什么会错过机会。利用澳大利亚家庭收入和劳动力动态(HILDA)调查中具有全国代表性的纵向数据(2001-18),我们比较了男性和女性毕业后需要多长时间才能获得高等学历(n = 2030年)实现劳动力市场的关键里程碑:(1)获得全职工作;(2) 获得永久合同;(3) 赚取平均工资;(4) 找到一份与他们的技能水平相匹配的工作。我们发现,在实现这些里程碑方面存在显著的性别差异,这证实了时间是理解教育回报中性别不平等的关键因素。我们将研究结果归因于教育、家庭和就业机构之间不兼容的“时间跨度”。更灵活的教育时间段使妇女能够取得成功,但不灵活的就业时间段(尤其是与家庭责任相结合时)阻碍了她们将教育成就转化为劳动力市场的进步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sociology is an international peer reviewed journal that publishes the highest quality original research in the social sciences.
期刊最新文献
Book Review: The Precariat: The New Dangerous Class – Special COVID-19 Edition by Guy Standing Do-it-yourself lifestyle movements in grassroots activist communities: A case study of Brisbane, Australia Book Review: Social Networks and Migration: Relocations, Relationships and Resources by Louise Ryan ‘This is NOT human services’: Counter-mapping automated decision-making in social services in Australia Book Review: Digital Migration by Koen Leurs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1