Optimizing outcomes after hernia repair: scientific highlights from the Danish Hernia Database 2010–2020

T. Bisgaard, F. Helgstrand, H. Friis-Andersen, J. Rosenberg, L. Jørgensen, K. Pedersen, N. Henriksen
{"title":"Optimizing outcomes after hernia repair: scientific highlights from the Danish Hernia Database 2010–2020","authors":"T. Bisgaard, F. Helgstrand, H. Friis-Andersen, J. Rosenberg, L. Jørgensen, K. Pedersen, N. Henriksen","doi":"10.21037/LS-20-130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": The National Danish Inguinal Hernia Database (1997) and Ventral Hernia Database (2007), together the Danish Hernia Database, was launched to monitor and optimize surgical quality and outcomes after hernia repairs. The purpose of the present qualitative review was to present five “highlight” publications from the 123 published/in press (October 2020) original publications from the Danish Hernia Database. Two international hernia experts independently nominated 10 publications from the Database publication list published between 2010 and 2020. Each of the 10 members of the database steering group ranked the 10 publications according to the following three categories: (I) originality, (II) methodology, and (III) clinical impact. The publications were ranked as 1= good, 2= very good, 3= outstanding. The five publications with the highest score were depicted as highlights. The publications dealt with: (I) long-term mesh-related complications after incisional hernia repair, (II) outcomes after parastomal hernia repairs, (III) mesh or suture repair of ventral hernias in women having subsequent pregnancy, (IV) reoperation for recurrence versus clinical recurrence rates, and (V) recurrence rates after resorbable versus non-resorbable tackers for laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. Data from the Danish Hernia Database is internationally acknowledged. The nationwide Danish data supplements the higher-ranking evidence by randomized controlled trials (RCTs) by adding evidence-based answers to scientifically clinically relevant questions. The Danish Hernia Database is still active after more than 20 years.","PeriodicalId":92818,"journal":{"name":"Laparoscopic surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laparoscopic surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/LS-20-130","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

: The National Danish Inguinal Hernia Database (1997) and Ventral Hernia Database (2007), together the Danish Hernia Database, was launched to monitor and optimize surgical quality and outcomes after hernia repairs. The purpose of the present qualitative review was to present five “highlight” publications from the 123 published/in press (October 2020) original publications from the Danish Hernia Database. Two international hernia experts independently nominated 10 publications from the Database publication list published between 2010 and 2020. Each of the 10 members of the database steering group ranked the 10 publications according to the following three categories: (I) originality, (II) methodology, and (III) clinical impact. The publications were ranked as 1= good, 2= very good, 3= outstanding. The five publications with the highest score were depicted as highlights. The publications dealt with: (I) long-term mesh-related complications after incisional hernia repair, (II) outcomes after parastomal hernia repairs, (III) mesh or suture repair of ventral hernias in women having subsequent pregnancy, (IV) reoperation for recurrence versus clinical recurrence rates, and (V) recurrence rates after resorbable versus non-resorbable tackers for laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. Data from the Danish Hernia Database is internationally acknowledged. The nationwide Danish data supplements the higher-ranking evidence by randomized controlled trials (RCTs) by adding evidence-based answers to scientifically clinically relevant questions. The Danish Hernia Database is still active after more than 20 years.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
疝修复后的优化结果:2010-2020年丹麦疝数据库的科学亮点
:丹麦国家腹股沟疝数据库(1997年)和腹疝数据库(2007年),以及丹麦疝数据库,旨在监测和优化疝修补术后的手术质量和结果。本定性审查的目的是介绍丹麦疝数据库123份已出版/出版的原始出版物中的五份“重点”出版物(2020年10月)。两位国际疝气专家从2010年至2020年间公布的数据库出版物列表中独立提名了10份出版物。数据库指导小组的10名成员分别根据以下三类对10份出版物进行了排名:(I)原创性、(II)方法论和(III)临床影响。出版物的排名为1=良好,2=非常好,3=杰出。得分最高的五份出版物被描述为亮点。这些出版物涉及:(I)切口疝修补术后的长期网状物相关并发症,(II)造口旁疝修补术的结果,(III)妊娠后妇女腹侧疝的网状物或缝合修复,(IV)复发率与临床复发率的再手术,和(V)腹腔镜腹疝修补术中可吸收钉与不可吸收钉后的复发率。丹麦疝数据库的数据得到了国际认可。丹麦全国范围内的数据通过随机对照试验(RCT)补充了更高级别的证据,为科学临床相关问题添加了循证答案。丹麦疝数据库在20多年后仍然活跃。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Minimally-invasive multidisciplinary treatment of deep endometriosis: 103 cases Case report: neuroendocrine tumour causing torsion of the appendix in an adolescent—a rare and unexpected twist Is elective cholecystectomy effective in geriatric patients to prevent new biliopancreatic events following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for benign biliopancreatic pathology? Managing complex pancreatic anastomoses after minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy Laparoscopic management of giant adrenal cyst: a case report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1