‘Spaces’ for restorative development: international case studies on restorative services

Q2 Social Sciences Contemporary Justice Review Pub Date : 2022-03-27 DOI:10.1080/10282580.2022.2044802
J. Hobson, B. Payne, Kabba Bangura, Richard Hester
{"title":"‘Spaces’ for restorative development: international case studies on restorative services","authors":"J. Hobson, B. Payne, Kabba Bangura, Richard Hester","doi":"10.1080/10282580.2022.2044802","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This paper examines the concept of the ‘spaces’ into which restorative services develop. We conceptualise such ‘spaces’ as: social, the people and communities; as political, the will for developments; as physical, the geography and facilities; and as economic, dependent on the resources available. The first case study examines the hub-and-spoke model from Gloucestershire, England, where a top-down approach with buy-in at the statutory level provides ‘space’ for institutional engagement and integration of restorative practice. The second examines community-led restorative services in Belfast, Northern Ireland, originally tackling paramilitary violence they now fill a ‘space’ in local communities caused by a distrust of the state. The final case study is from Kenema City, Sierra Leone, where a post-conflict and post-Ebola ‘space’ is filled by an urban agriculture scheme aiming to divert young people from harmful activity and to reintegrate into society. Across the three cases in this paper, we hope to show that the types of ‘space’ we identify can be an important conceptual tool in helping to understand how and why restorative services develop, the provision they offer, and the capacities they haves to expand.","PeriodicalId":10583,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Justice Review","volume":"25 1","pages":"143 - 162"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Justice Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10282580.2022.2044802","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper examines the concept of the ‘spaces’ into which restorative services develop. We conceptualise such ‘spaces’ as: social, the people and communities; as political, the will for developments; as physical, the geography and facilities; and as economic, dependent on the resources available. The first case study examines the hub-and-spoke model from Gloucestershire, England, where a top-down approach with buy-in at the statutory level provides ‘space’ for institutional engagement and integration of restorative practice. The second examines community-led restorative services in Belfast, Northern Ireland, originally tackling paramilitary violence they now fill a ‘space’ in local communities caused by a distrust of the state. The final case study is from Kenema City, Sierra Leone, where a post-conflict and post-Ebola ‘space’ is filled by an urban agriculture scheme aiming to divert young people from harmful activity and to reintegrate into society. Across the three cases in this paper, we hope to show that the types of ‘space’ we identify can be an important conceptual tool in helping to understand how and why restorative services develop, the provision they offer, and the capacities they haves to expand.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
恢复性发展的“空间”:恢复性服务的国际案例研究
本文探讨了恢复性服务发展的“空间”概念。我们将这样的“空间”概念化为:社会,人和社区;政治方面,发展的意愿;作为物理,地理和设施;经济上,依赖于可用的资源。第一个案例研究考察了来自英格兰格洛斯特郡的轮辐模式,在该模式中,自上而下的方法在法定层面上为机构参与和整合恢复性实践提供了“空间”。第二项研究考察了北爱尔兰贝尔法斯特社区主导的康复服务,最初是解决准军事暴力问题,现在却填补了当地社区因对国家不信任而造成的“空间”。最后一个案例研究来自塞拉利昂的凯内马市,在那里,一个城市农业计划填补了冲突和埃博拉后的“空间”,旨在将年轻人从有害活动中转移出来,重新融入社会。在本文的三个案例中,我们希望表明,我们确定的“空间”类型可以成为一个重要的概念工具,帮助理解恢复性服务如何以及为什么发展,它们提供的服务以及它们必须扩展的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Contemporary Justice Review
Contemporary Justice Review Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊最新文献
Cultivating just campus communities: engaging university students in developing restorative justice alternatives Defining restorative justice: a perspective from England and Wales’s further education sector The agricultural prison industry: a scoping review The international criminal court and responsibility for mass atrocities: can JCE enhance capacity to hold masterminds accountable? Restorative justice for adult offenders in South Australia: judicial perspectives and insights
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1