Counting Blue(tooth) Cars: Assessing Cellphone Use Among Vehicle Drivers in the Midwestern USA

D. Kruger, M. Falbo, Camille Gazoul, Ethan Cole, Noreen Nader, Sophie Blanchard, Ailiya Duan, Shannon Murphy, Dóra Juhász, Claire M. Saunders, Peter A. Sonnega, J. Kruger, J. Elhai
{"title":"Counting Blue(tooth) Cars: Assessing Cellphone Use Among Vehicle Drivers in the Midwestern USA","authors":"D. Kruger, M. Falbo, Camille Gazoul, Ethan Cole, Noreen Nader, Sophie Blanchard, Ailiya Duan, Shannon Murphy, Dóra Juhász, Claire M. Saunders, Peter A. Sonnega, J. Kruger, J. Elhai","doi":"10.22330/HEB/332/048-057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mobile cell phones are integral to social fabric of the contemporary United States and other technologically advanced societies. There is considerable research on the psychology and behavior of cell phone use, though most of the scientific literature is based on survey studies and experience sampling applications. Cell phone use while driving increases the risk of automobile accidents. Survey responses regarding controversial and illegal behaviors are often biased by socially-desirable responding. Precise data on population usage patterns are typically proprietary. Naturalistic observations may provide unique information that complements findings from self-report survey methods and address research questions outside the proper scope of surveys and topics on which socially-desirably responding may occur. We examined cell phone use among drivers (N = 2538) in a Midwestern USA college town. In the study setting , texting while driving is illegal, whereas both hands-free (e.g., Bluetooth-enabled) and phone-inhand calls are permitted. However, drivers cited for traffic violations may also be charged with careless driving due to cell phone use. Overall, 23% of drivers were observed using their phones; 9% were talking with their phones in hand, 9% were texting , and 6.4% of those with no passengers in the car were observed talking (likely on a hands-free, or Bluetooth, call). Older drivers were less likely to be texting. Drivers were less likely to be using their phones when they had passengers and when it was raining. We demonstrate the value of observational studies for understanding technology use; our results complement those of self-report survey research.","PeriodicalId":91082,"journal":{"name":"Human ethology bulletin","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human ethology bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22330/HEB/332/048-057","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Mobile cell phones are integral to social fabric of the contemporary United States and other technologically advanced societies. There is considerable research on the psychology and behavior of cell phone use, though most of the scientific literature is based on survey studies and experience sampling applications. Cell phone use while driving increases the risk of automobile accidents. Survey responses regarding controversial and illegal behaviors are often biased by socially-desirable responding. Precise data on population usage patterns are typically proprietary. Naturalistic observations may provide unique information that complements findings from self-report survey methods and address research questions outside the proper scope of surveys and topics on which socially-desirably responding may occur. We examined cell phone use among drivers (N = 2538) in a Midwestern USA college town. In the study setting , texting while driving is illegal, whereas both hands-free (e.g., Bluetooth-enabled) and phone-inhand calls are permitted. However, drivers cited for traffic violations may also be charged with careless driving due to cell phone use. Overall, 23% of drivers were observed using their phones; 9% were talking with their phones in hand, 9% were texting , and 6.4% of those with no passengers in the car were observed talking (likely on a hands-free, or Bluetooth, call). Older drivers were less likely to be texting. Drivers were less likely to be using their phones when they had passengers and when it was raining. We demonstrate the value of observational studies for understanding technology use; our results complement those of self-report survey research.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
数蓝牙汽车:评估美国中西部汽车司机的手机使用情况
移动电话是当代美国和其他技术先进社会的社会结构的组成部分。尽管大多数科学文献都是基于调查研究和经验抽样应用,但人们对手机使用的心理和行为进行了大量研究。开车时使用手机会增加发生车祸的风险。关于有争议和非法行为的调查回应往往因社会期望的回应而存在偏见。人口使用模式的精确数据通常是专有的。自然主义的观察可以提供独特的信息,补充自我报告调查方法的发现,并解决调查范围之外的研究问题和可能产生社会期望反应的主题。我们调查了美国中西部一所大学城的司机(N=2538)使用手机的情况。在研究环境中,开车时发短信是违法的,而免提(例如,启用蓝牙)和电话通话都是允许的。然而,因交通违法而被传讯的司机也可能因使用手机而被指控粗心驾驶。总体而言,23%的司机使用手机;9%的人手里拿着手机聊天,9%的人发短信,6.4%的车内没有乘客的人被观察到在聊天(可能是免提或蓝牙通话)。年纪较大的司机不太可能发短信。当有乘客和下雨时,司机不太可能使用手机。我们证明了观察性研究对理解技术使用的价值;我们的结果补充了自我报告调查研究的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
ISHE Travels to Amazon: A Narrative of a Special Issue Based on the XXII ISHE Conference, 5-9 August 2014 in Belém, Brazil The Ethologist’s Corner The Trouble With Certainty in the Study of Human Evolution Women at the “Sight” of Evolution A Lost Idea in Psychology: Observation as Starting Point for the Scientific Investigation of Human Behavior
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1