An applicability test of the use of deposit-refund system for managing water-sachet litter in Ilorin, Nigeria

Q3 Social Sciences Environmental Economics Pub Date : 2018-12-25 DOI:10.21511/EE.09(4).2018.03
Musa Ilias Biala, Omo Aregbeyen
{"title":"An applicability test of the use of deposit-refund system for managing water-sachet litter in Ilorin, Nigeria","authors":"Musa Ilias Biala, Omo Aregbeyen","doi":"10.21511/EE.09(4).2018.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study used both quasi-experiment and contingent valuation survey to explore the applicability of deposit-refund system (DRS) to water-sachet litter management in Nigeria. In the experiment, a DRS was established to incentivize the participants to return emptied sachets of water. A contingent valuation survey of 454 sachet-water consumers selected using quasi-systematic sampling technique was conducted. Experimental results showed that the number of sachets returned by the experimental group – those subjected to DRS – was significantly greater than that of the comparison group – those not subjected to DRS. Logit regression results showed that refund size increased the odds of returning sachets by 42.0%. Increasing the redemption time decreased the odds of turning in sachets by about 16.0%. A one-minute increase in the time spent on redemption would result in about 2.4% decrease in the probability that participants would comply. Income decreased the odds of compliance by about 31.0%, while age reduced the odds of compliance by about 2.2%. These results imply that the DRS reduced water-sachet littering in the study area, and that income, refund amount, redemption time, age and perceived effectiveness of DRS influenced consumers’ compliance with DRS. Hence, an appropriate motivating DRS would reduce litter and its attendant problems, such as hygiene, plastic pollution, flooding, aesthetic loss, non-naturally degradable toxic compounds, degradation of natural habitat ant its endangered species. The government should, therefore, implement a DRS and set up recycling plants, or encourage private recycling firms, in order to accommodate used sachets that would end up piling up.","PeriodicalId":52974,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Economics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21511/EE.09(4).2018.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study used both quasi-experiment and contingent valuation survey to explore the applicability of deposit-refund system (DRS) to water-sachet litter management in Nigeria. In the experiment, a DRS was established to incentivize the participants to return emptied sachets of water. A contingent valuation survey of 454 sachet-water consumers selected using quasi-systematic sampling technique was conducted. Experimental results showed that the number of sachets returned by the experimental group – those subjected to DRS – was significantly greater than that of the comparison group – those not subjected to DRS. Logit regression results showed that refund size increased the odds of returning sachets by 42.0%. Increasing the redemption time decreased the odds of turning in sachets by about 16.0%. A one-minute increase in the time spent on redemption would result in about 2.4% decrease in the probability that participants would comply. Income decreased the odds of compliance by about 31.0%, while age reduced the odds of compliance by about 2.2%. These results imply that the DRS reduced water-sachet littering in the study area, and that income, refund amount, redemption time, age and perceived effectiveness of DRS influenced consumers’ compliance with DRS. Hence, an appropriate motivating DRS would reduce litter and its attendant problems, such as hygiene, plastic pollution, flooding, aesthetic loss, non-naturally degradable toxic compounds, degradation of natural habitat ant its endangered species. The government should, therefore, implement a DRS and set up recycling plants, or encourage private recycling firms, in order to accommodate used sachets that would end up piling up.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在尼日利亚伊洛林使用押金退款系统管理水袋垃圾的适用性测试
本研究采用准实验和偶然估价调查的方法,探讨了押金退款系统(DRS)在尼日利亚水袋垃圾管理中的适用性。在实验中,建立了一个DRS来激励参与者归还空的小袋水。采用准系统抽样技术对454个小袋水消费者进行了偶然估价调查。实验结果表明,实验组(接受DRS的组)退回的小袋数量明显多于对照组(未接受DRS的对照组)。Logit回归结果显示,退款金额使退回小袋的几率增加了42.0%。增加兑换时间将使退回小盒的几率降低约16.0%。兑换时间增加一分钟将使参与者遵守规定的概率降低约2.4%。收入使合规几率降低了约31.0%,而年龄使合规概率降低了约2.2%。这些结果表明,DRS减少了研究区域的水袋垃圾,收入、退款金额、赎回时间、年龄和DRS的感知有效性影响了消费者对DRS的合规性。因此,适当的激励DRS将减少垃圾及其伴随的问题,如卫生、塑料污染、洪水、美学损失、不可自然降解的有毒化合物、自然栖息地及其濒危物种的退化。因此,政府应该实施DRS,建立回收厂,或者鼓励私人回收公司,以容纳最终堆积起来的用过的小袋。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Economics
Environmental Economics Social Sciences-Public Administration
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Decarbonization in the maritime industry: Factors to create an efficient transition strategy Governmental approaches to food security management: A bibliometric analysis Implementation of eco-control system by Indonesian manufacturing firms: Understanding the mediating role of organizational culture Is corporate social responsibility effective in improving environmental quality? Literature review Evaluating the efficiency of public expenditure in municipal waste collection: A comparative study of Portuguese municipalities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1