A systematic examination of the family business contributions: is this domain a legitimate field of research?

IF 0.9 Q4 MANAGEMENT Journal of Management History Pub Date : 2022-12-27 DOI:10.1108/jmh-08-2022-0031
Chelsea Sherlock, Erik T. Markin, R. G. Swab, Victoria Antin Yates
{"title":"A systematic examination of the family business contributions: is this domain a legitimate field of research?","authors":"Chelsea Sherlock, Erik T. Markin, R. G. Swab, Victoria Antin Yates","doi":"10.1108/jmh-08-2022-0031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe purpose of this study is to systematically analyze family business research, which has experienced tremendous growth. Through this study’s categorization and evaluation of research, the authors illustrate the evolution of family business research in management, entrepreneurship and family business domains over the past decade.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis study provides an interdisciplinary systematic review of family business literature between 2008 and 2022 to analyze the family business field. Following similar previous reviews (Chrisman et al., 2003; Debicki et al., 2009), this study’s final sample includes 1,443 studies, which the authors categorize into six broad topics and 21 subcategories of management topics.\n\n\nFindings\nThis study’s analysis reveals the field has grown nearly fivefold since 2007. As such, the authors examine the growth and decline of specific research topics. The authors also find in the past decade family business research has experienced rapid growth across a variety of outlets, signaling increasing reach, richness and legitimacy of the field.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nBy reviewing and analyzing 1,443 family business articles, the results illustrate the evolution of family business research over the past decade and what this means for its future. Based on this study’s systematic review, the authors offer insights into the state of the field and propose avenues for future research so the field can continue to prosper.\n","PeriodicalId":45819,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Management History","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Management History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jmh-08-2022-0031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study is to systematically analyze family business research, which has experienced tremendous growth. Through this study’s categorization and evaluation of research, the authors illustrate the evolution of family business research in management, entrepreneurship and family business domains over the past decade. Design/methodology/approach This study provides an interdisciplinary systematic review of family business literature between 2008 and 2022 to analyze the family business field. Following similar previous reviews (Chrisman et al., 2003; Debicki et al., 2009), this study’s final sample includes 1,443 studies, which the authors categorize into six broad topics and 21 subcategories of management topics. Findings This study’s analysis reveals the field has grown nearly fivefold since 2007. As such, the authors examine the growth and decline of specific research topics. The authors also find in the past decade family business research has experienced rapid growth across a variety of outlets, signaling increasing reach, richness and legitimacy of the field. Originality/value By reviewing and analyzing 1,443 family business articles, the results illustrate the evolution of family business research over the past decade and what this means for its future. Based on this study’s systematic review, the authors offer insights into the state of the field and propose avenues for future research so the field can continue to prosper.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对家族企业贡献的系统考察:这是一个合法的研究领域吗?
目的本研究旨在系统分析家族企业研究的发展历程。通过本研究对研究的分类和评估,作者阐述了过去十年来家族企业研究在管理、创业和家族企业领域的演变。设计/方法论/方法本研究对2008年至2022年间的家族企业文献进行了跨学科系统综述,以分析家族企业领域。根据之前类似的综述(Chrisman等人,2003年;Debicki等人,2009年),本研究的最终样本包括1443项研究,作者将其分为六大主题和21个子类别的管理主题。这项研究的分析显示,自2007年以来,该领域增长了近五倍。因此,作者考察了特定研究主题的增长和衰落。作者还发现,在过去十年中,家族企业研究在各种渠道中都经历了快速增长,这表明该领域的影响力、丰富性和合法性不断增强。原创性/价值通过回顾和分析1443篇家族企业文章,研究结果说明了过去十年家族企业研究的演变,以及这对其未来意味着什么。基于这项研究的系统综述,作者深入了解了该领域的现状,并提出了未来研究的途径,使该领域能够继续繁荣。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
50.00%
发文量
28
期刊最新文献
Unveiling the intellectual nexus between Peirce’s synechism and Goldratt’s theory of constraints: insights for management and organization studies Back to roots! The singular introduction of statutory auditing in France, Germany and Great Britain (1844–1935) Rooting firm responsibility in social-ecological systems through ancient Nahua thought: rethinking the logic model in the global reporting initiative The troubled establishment of the Tourist Hotel Corporation of New Zealand Boundary spanning activities and resource orchestration as microfoundations of dynamic capability: a systematic literature review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1