A Note on Contra Apionem 1.250: Further Evidence for Anti-Jewish Interpolation

IF 0.2 0 RELIGION Journal of Ancient Judaism Pub Date : 2021-04-19 DOI:10.30965/21967954-BJA10005
C. Ferguson
{"title":"A Note on Contra Apionem 1.250: Further Evidence for Anti-Jewish Interpolation","authors":"C. Ferguson","doi":"10.30965/21967954-BJA10005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThis article makes the case that the citation of Manetho’s Aegyptiaca found within Josephus’ Contra Apionem 1.250 is the work of a later anti-Jewish interpolator. Within the passage is an unnoticed chiasm that artificially binds the description of Osarsiph/Moses there with the Osarsephos introduced earlier in C. Ap. 1.238–9. It further suggests that the reason a negative depiction of Moses is not more fully integrated into Manetho’s story is the result of the interpolator inferring Manetho’s negative evaluation of the Jews as a result of his negative evaluation of the Hyksos. Manetho is, in other words, not the father of Egyptian anti-Judaism, though an anonymous editor may well be.","PeriodicalId":41821,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ancient Judaism","volume":"1 1","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ancient Judaism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30965/21967954-BJA10005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article makes the case that the citation of Manetho’s Aegyptiaca found within Josephus’ Contra Apionem 1.250 is the work of a later anti-Jewish interpolator. Within the passage is an unnoticed chiasm that artificially binds the description of Osarsiph/Moses there with the Osarsephos introduced earlier in C. Ap. 1.238–9. It further suggests that the reason a negative depiction of Moses is not more fully integrated into Manetho’s story is the result of the interpolator inferring Manetho’s negative evaluation of the Jews as a result of his negative evaluation of the Hyksos. Manetho is, in other words, not the father of Egyptian anti-Judaism, though an anonymous editor may well be.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关于Contra Apionem 1.250的注释:反犹太插值的进一步证据
这篇文章提出,在约瑟夫斯的《反阿皮涅姆1.250》中发现的马尼托的《埃及埃及》的引文是后来一位反犹太的插值者的作品。在这段话中有一个未被注意到的交叉,它人为地将对奥萨西夫/摩西的描述与早先在C. Ap. 1.238-9中介绍的奥萨西弗联系在一起。它进一步表明,对摩西的负面描述没有更充分地融入马涅托的故事的原因是,插入者推断马涅托对犹太人的负面评价是他对希克索斯人的负面评价的结果。换句话说,马尼托不是埃及反犹太教之父,尽管一位匿名编辑很可能是。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
50.00%
发文量
17
期刊最新文献
A Re-evaluation and Analysis of CPJ V 638 and Its Implications for Understanding Social Relationships in the Roman Empire, and the Roman-Jewish Relationship in Particular A “Queer” Mother of Nations: Reproductive Futurism and the Maccabean Mother of Seven What Did Jacob Read at Bethel?: Scrolls and Scripture in Jubilees 32:21–26 The Aramaic Inscriptions from Mount Gerizim: Production, Identity, and Resistance Divine Wisdom and Knowledge on Steroids: גבורה in Biblical Tradition and at Qumran
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1