Explaining output growth and total factor productivity changes using production frontier: The case of Ethiopian smallholders farming

Berisso Metaksa Oumer
{"title":"Explaining output growth and total factor productivity changes using production frontier: The case of Ethiopian smallholders farming","authors":"Berisso Metaksa Oumer","doi":"10.5897/jdae2020.1167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper provides a parametric decomposition of output growth and total factor productivity changes, extending production approach to the case of non-neutral stochastic frontier. The results were based on unbalanced panel data from Ethiopian smallholder farmers observed over the period 1999–2015. The study decomposes output growth into input growth and total factor productivity changes while both were further decomposed into components. Output growth was decomposed into individual inputs contribution, whilst total factor productivity change decomposed into technical change, scale effect and technical efficiency changes. The empirical findings indicate output growth was mainly driven by total factor productivity changes (71%) while 22% attributed to input growth. Technical change found to be the main source of total factor productivity while scale effect also contributed significantly. Technical efficiency change was found to be the main source for the reduction of total factor productivity and so in output growth. The result indicates both changes due to inputs use and farm-characteristics were found the most important, in explaining technical efficiency changes, cancelling the negative impact due to autonomous changes and environmental factors. The finding implies there are total factor productivity changes and the output growth in cereal farming is mainly driven by technical change, suggesting policies aim at enhancing technology adoption and investment in modernizing agriculture are significantly effective. Thus policies directed toward enhancing agricultural technologies that improve technical change, enable farmers to benefit from scale of operations and their best practice form essential part of the overall agricultural policies. \n \n Key words: Output growth, total factor productivity, decomposition, stochastic frontier, farming, Ethiopia.","PeriodicalId":90891,"journal":{"name":"Journal of development and agricultural economics","volume":"12 1","pages":"168-180"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5897/jdae2020.1167","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of development and agricultural economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5897/jdae2020.1167","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper provides a parametric decomposition of output growth and total factor productivity changes, extending production approach to the case of non-neutral stochastic frontier. The results were based on unbalanced panel data from Ethiopian smallholder farmers observed over the period 1999–2015. The study decomposes output growth into input growth and total factor productivity changes while both were further decomposed into components. Output growth was decomposed into individual inputs contribution, whilst total factor productivity change decomposed into technical change, scale effect and technical efficiency changes. The empirical findings indicate output growth was mainly driven by total factor productivity changes (71%) while 22% attributed to input growth. Technical change found to be the main source of total factor productivity while scale effect also contributed significantly. Technical efficiency change was found to be the main source for the reduction of total factor productivity and so in output growth. The result indicates both changes due to inputs use and farm-characteristics were found the most important, in explaining technical efficiency changes, cancelling the negative impact due to autonomous changes and environmental factors. The finding implies there are total factor productivity changes and the output growth in cereal farming is mainly driven by technical change, suggesting policies aim at enhancing technology adoption and investment in modernizing agriculture are significantly effective. Thus policies directed toward enhancing agricultural technologies that improve technical change, enable farmers to benefit from scale of operations and their best practice form essential part of the overall agricultural policies. Key words: Output growth, total factor productivity, decomposition, stochastic frontier, farming, Ethiopia.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用生产边界解释产出增长和全要素生产率变化:以埃塞俄比亚小农为例
本文提供了产出增长和全要素生产率变化的参数分解,将生产方法推广到非中性随机前沿的情况。该结果基于1999-2005年期间观察到的埃塞俄比亚小农户的不平衡面板数据。该研究将产出增长分解为投入增长和全要素生产率变化,同时将两者进一步分解为组成部分。产出增长分解为个体投入贡献,全要素生产率变化分解为技术变化、规模效应和技术效率变化。实证结果表明,产出增长主要由全要素生产率变化驱动(71%),而22%归因于投入增长。技术变革是全要素生产率的主要来源,而规模效应也起着重要作用。研究发现,技术效率的变化是全要素生产率下降的主要原因,从而导致产出增长。结果表明,在解释技术效率变化、抵消自主变化和环境因素造成的负面影响方面,投入使用和农场特征造成的变化最为重要。这一发现表明,全要素生产率发生了变化,谷物种植的产出增长主要由技术变革驱动,这表明旨在提高技术采用率和投资于农业现代化的政策非常有效。因此,旨在提高农业技术、改善技术变革、使农民能够从经营规模及其最佳实践中受益的政策是整体农业政策的重要组成部分。关键词:产出增长,全要素生产率,分解,随机前沿,农业,埃塞俄比亚。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Impact of adoption lag of soil and water conservation practices on crop productivity in Sio-Malaba Malakisi Basin of Kenya-Uganda border Determining the pathway for commercialization of bioenergy technologies and products among stakeholders in the bioenergy value chain in Baringo County, Kenya Determinants of utilization of banana value addition among small-scale agripreneurs in Kenya: A case of Kisii County Assessing the determinants of farm households choice of livelihood diversification strategies in Sub Zoba Debarwa, Eritrea Vertical market linkages between smallholder African indigenous vegetables farmers and other market actors in Bungoma County
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1