Reflections on women’s activism in twentieth-century Britain

IF 0.5 3区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY WOMENS HISTORY REVIEW Pub Date : 2023-08-27 DOI:10.1080/09612025.2023.2248703
Paula Bartley
{"title":"Reflections on women’s activism in twentieth-century Britain","authors":"Paula Bartley","doi":"10.1080/09612025.2023.2248703","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article is based on a talk I gave at the London School of Economics in March 2023. The talk was structured in a way to give me the freedom to reflect upon some of the key themes in my book Women’s Activism in Twentith Century Britain; making a difference across the political spectrum. I wrote the book during the pandemic. Archives were closed and even when they opened I could not use them as I had to shield because of health issues. Consequently, the material I relied on was what I could access on-line and on people who I could interview on Zoom. My book drew on my own experiences as an activist and my own theoretical development as a feminist. History and activism intertwined: my story as a former activist and my view that feminist historical scholarship is itself a type of activism came together to give direction and meaning both to my research and to my writing. In my talk, and in this Viewpoint, I want to show the heterogeneous nature of activism, of how individuals and groups from a range of different class and racial background sought to make a difference to their locality, their country and sometimes the world. I argue that women are not a homogenous group but are united—and divided—by class, ethnicity, gender and so on. For instance, not all female activists campaigned for progressive measures, indeed many promoted reactionary agendas.","PeriodicalId":46582,"journal":{"name":"WOMENS HISTORY REVIEW","volume":"32 1","pages":"901 - 916"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"WOMENS HISTORY REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09612025.2023.2248703","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article is based on a talk I gave at the London School of Economics in March 2023. The talk was structured in a way to give me the freedom to reflect upon some of the key themes in my book Women’s Activism in Twentith Century Britain; making a difference across the political spectrum. I wrote the book during the pandemic. Archives were closed and even when they opened I could not use them as I had to shield because of health issues. Consequently, the material I relied on was what I could access on-line and on people who I could interview on Zoom. My book drew on my own experiences as an activist and my own theoretical development as a feminist. History and activism intertwined: my story as a former activist and my view that feminist historical scholarship is itself a type of activism came together to give direction and meaning both to my research and to my writing. In my talk, and in this Viewpoint, I want to show the heterogeneous nature of activism, of how individuals and groups from a range of different class and racial background sought to make a difference to their locality, their country and sometimes the world. I argue that women are not a homogenous group but are united—and divided—by class, ethnicity, gender and so on. For instance, not all female activists campaigned for progressive measures, indeed many promoted reactionary agendas.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对20世纪英国女性激进主义的思考
本文改编自我于2023年3月在伦敦经济学院的一次演讲。这次演讲的目的是让我可以自由地思考我的书《二十世纪英国的妇女运动》中的一些关键主题;在政治光谱上有所作为。我在大流行期间写了这本书。档案是关闭的,即使它们打开了,我也不能使用它们,因为我必须保护它们,因为我有健康问题。因此,我所依赖的材料是我可以在网上访问的,以及我可以在Zoom上采访的人。我的书借鉴了我作为一名活动家的经历,以及我作为一名女权主义者的理论发展。历史和行动主义交织在一起:我作为一名前活动家的经历和我认为女权主义历史研究本身就是一种行动主义的观点结合在一起,为我的研究和写作提供了方向和意义。在我的演讲中,在这个观点中,我想展示行动主义的异质性,来自不同阶级和种族背景的个人和团体如何寻求改变他们的地方,他们的国家,有时是世界。我认为女性不是一个同质的群体,而是由阶级、种族、性别等因素联合起来的。例如,并非所有的女性活动家都为进步措施而竞选,事实上,许多人推动了反动议程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
14.30%
发文量
77
期刊介绍: Women"s History Review is a major international journal whose aim is to provide a forum for the publication of new scholarly articles in the field of womens" history. The time span covered by the journal includes the 19th, 20th and 21st centuries as well as earlier times. The journal seeks to publish contributions from a range of disciplines (for example, women"s studies, history, sociology, cultural studies, literature, political science, anthropology, philosophy and media studies) that further feminist knowledge and debate about women and/or gender relations in history. The Editors welcome a variety of approaches from people from different countries and backgrounds.
期刊最新文献
Gender in urban development of post-war Europe. Women’s social position in the planning strategies of Basildon (UK) and Pernik (Bulgaria) in the long 1950s Congratulations to Rachel Reeves who, in 2024, becomes the first woman to be Chancellor of the Exchequer in the UK Two lost women and an unlikely French connection The great Miss Lydia Becker Dale Spender (1943–2023): some personal reflections
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1