Promoting Practitioner Research through a Social Work Teaching Partnership

Q2 Social Sciences Practice Pub Date : 2022-09-29 DOI:10.1080/09503153.2022.2128324
G. Buck, Nicola Whiteside, Andrea Newman, Helen Jones, Selwyn Stanley, J. Feather, W. Millard
{"title":"Promoting Practitioner Research through a Social Work Teaching Partnership","authors":"G. Buck, Nicola Whiteside, Andrea Newman, Helen Jones, Selwyn Stanley, J. Feather, W. Millard","doi":"10.1080/09503153.2022.2128324","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research is critical for effective and innovative social work practice, yet social workers do not always have time to engage with research and there are limited accounts of how practitioners can undertake research in practical and meaningful terms (Mitchell, Lunt, and Shaw 2010). Using a reflective, storytelling methodology (Beresford 2016), which centres experiential knowledge, we describe how one regional social work teaching partnership nurtured practitioner research over a three-year period. We introduce a regionally administrated ‘hub’, that connected social workers and academics and supported the development of seventeen research teams. The studies that resulted, focused on a range of important issues including child protection, young people in transition to adult services, adults in community and residential settings, lived experience-led provision, and social work education. In terms of limitations, our reflections are descriptive and illuminative, rather than critical, our findings are also not representative but rather reflect a snapshot of practice. Despite limitations, this commentary reveals the feasibility and value of proactively nurturing practitioner research and offers a blueprint for cultivating similar initiatives in other regions.","PeriodicalId":35184,"journal":{"name":"Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09503153.2022.2128324","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Research is critical for effective and innovative social work practice, yet social workers do not always have time to engage with research and there are limited accounts of how practitioners can undertake research in practical and meaningful terms (Mitchell, Lunt, and Shaw 2010). Using a reflective, storytelling methodology (Beresford 2016), which centres experiential knowledge, we describe how one regional social work teaching partnership nurtured practitioner research over a three-year period. We introduce a regionally administrated ‘hub’, that connected social workers and academics and supported the development of seventeen research teams. The studies that resulted, focused on a range of important issues including child protection, young people in transition to adult services, adults in community and residential settings, lived experience-led provision, and social work education. In terms of limitations, our reflections are descriptive and illuminative, rather than critical, our findings are also not representative but rather reflect a snapshot of practice. Despite limitations, this commentary reveals the feasibility and value of proactively nurturing practitioner research and offers a blueprint for cultivating similar initiatives in other regions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过社会工作教学伙伴关系促进从业者研究
研究对于有效和创新的社会工作实践至关重要,但社会工作者并不总是有时间参与研究,而且对从业者如何以实际和有意义的方式进行研究的描述有限(Mitchell,Lunt,and Shaw,2010)。我们使用以体验知识为中心的反思性、讲故事的方法(Beresford 2016),描述了一个区域社会工作教学伙伴关系如何在三年的时间里培养从业者研究。我们引入了一个区域管理的“中心”,将社会工作者和学者联系起来,并支持17个研究团队的发展。由此产生的研究集中在一系列重要问题上,包括儿童保护、向成人服务过渡的年轻人、社区和居住环境中的成年人、以生活经验为导向的服务以及社会工作教育。就局限性而言,我们的反思是描述性的和启发性的,而不是批判性的,我们的发现也不具有代表性,而是反映了实践的快照。尽管存在局限性,但这篇评论揭示了积极培养从业者研究的可行性和价值,并为在其他地区培养类似举措提供了蓝图。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Practice
Practice Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
期刊最新文献
Reflections of Social Work Academics on Moving from Social Work Practice to the Academic Environment Nurturing nursing professionals: unleashing the rhizomatic power of expression, creativity, and art as resistance The contribution of a residential upon an undergraduate university experience Artificial Intelligence (AI) in practitioner education in higher education (HE) Social Work and Common Sense: A Critical Examination Social Work and Common Sense: A Critical Examination Paul Michael GarrettLondon: Routledge, 2024280 pp.£35.99, ISBN: 9781032456461
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1