Experimental and simulative determination and correction of the effective gap extension in structured coaxial measuring systems

IF 2.3 3区 工程技术 Q2 MECHANICS Rheologica Acta Pub Date : 2023-01-16 DOI:10.1007/s00397-023-01383-2
Sebastian Josch, Steffen Jesinghausen, Christopher Dechert, Hans-Joachim Schmid
{"title":"Experimental and simulative determination and correction of the effective gap extension in structured coaxial measuring systems","authors":"Sebastian Josch,&nbsp;Steffen Jesinghausen,&nbsp;Christopher Dechert,&nbsp;Hans-Joachim Schmid","doi":"10.1007/s00397-023-01383-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The use of structured measuring systems to prevent wall slip is a common approach to obtain absolute rheological values. Typically, only the minimum distance between the measuring surfaces is used for further calculation, implying that no flow occurs between the structural elements. But this assumption is misleading, and a gap correction is necessary. To determine the radius correction <span>\\(\\Delta r\\)</span> for specific geometries, we conducted investigations on three Newtonian fluids (two silicon oils and one suspension considered to be Newtonian in the relevant shear rate range). The results show that <span>\\(\\Delta r\\)</span> is not only shear- and material-independent, but geometry-dependent, providing a Newtonian flow behaviour in a similar viscosity range. Therefore, a correction value can be determined with only minute deviations in different Newtonian fluids. As the conducted laboratory measurements are very time-consuming and expensive, a CFD-approach with only very small deviations was additionally developed and compared for validation purposes. Therefore, simulation is an effective and resource-efficient alternative to the presented laboratory measurements to determine <span>\\(\\Delta r\\)</span> for the correction of structured coaxial geometries even for non-Newtonian fluids in the future.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":755,"journal":{"name":"Rheologica Acta","volume":"62 2-3","pages":"129 - 143"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00397-023-01383-2.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rheologica Acta","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00397-023-01383-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MECHANICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The use of structured measuring systems to prevent wall slip is a common approach to obtain absolute rheological values. Typically, only the minimum distance between the measuring surfaces is used for further calculation, implying that no flow occurs between the structural elements. But this assumption is misleading, and a gap correction is necessary. To determine the radius correction \(\Delta r\) for specific geometries, we conducted investigations on three Newtonian fluids (two silicon oils and one suspension considered to be Newtonian in the relevant shear rate range). The results show that \(\Delta r\) is not only shear- and material-independent, but geometry-dependent, providing a Newtonian flow behaviour in a similar viscosity range. Therefore, a correction value can be determined with only minute deviations in different Newtonian fluids. As the conducted laboratory measurements are very time-consuming and expensive, a CFD-approach with only very small deviations was additionally developed and compared for validation purposes. Therefore, simulation is an effective and resource-efficient alternative to the presented laboratory measurements to determine \(\Delta r\) for the correction of structured coaxial geometries even for non-Newtonian fluids in the future.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
结构化同轴测量系统中有效间隙扩展的实验与仿真测定与校正
使用结构化测量系统来防止壁滑移是获得绝对流变值的常用方法。通常,仅使用测量表面之间的最小距离进行进一步计算,这意味着结构元件之间没有流动。但这种假设具有误导性,有必要对差距进行修正。为了确定特定几何形状的半径校正\(\Delta r\),我们对三种牛顿流体(两种硅油和一种被认为在相关剪切速率范围内为牛顿流体的悬浮液)进行了研究。结果表明,\(\Delta r\)不仅与剪切和材料无关,而且与几何相关,在相似的粘度范围内提供牛顿流动行为。因此,在不同的牛顿流体中,只要有微小的偏差,就可以确定一个修正值。由于进行的实验室测量非常耗时和昂贵,因此为了验证目的,还开发了一种只有非常小偏差的cfd方法并进行了比较。因此,模拟是一种有效且资源高效的替代实验室测量方法,可以确定\(\Delta r\),即使在未来非牛顿流体中也可以校正结构同轴几何形状。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Rheologica Acta
Rheologica Acta 物理-力学
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
8.70%
发文量
55
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: "Rheologica Acta is the official journal of The European Society of Rheology. The aim of the journal is to advance the science of rheology, by publishing high quality peer reviewed articles, invited reviews and peer reviewed short communications. The Scope of Rheologica Acta includes: - Advances in rheometrical and rheo-physical techniques, rheo-optics, microrheology - Rheology of soft matter systems, including polymer melts and solutions, colloidal dispersions, cement, ceramics, glasses, gels, emulsions, surfactant systems, liquid crystals, biomaterials and food. - Rheology of Solids, chemo-rheology - Electro and magnetorheology - Theory of rheology - Non-Newtonian fluid mechanics, complex fluids in microfluidic devices and flow instabilities - Interfacial rheology Rheologica Acta aims to publish papers which represent a substantial advance in the field, mere data reports or incremental work will not be considered. Priority will be given to papers that are methodological in nature and are beneficial to a wide range of material classes. It should also be noted that the list of topics given above is meant to be representative, not exhaustive. The editors welcome feedback on the journal and suggestions for reviews and comments."
期刊最新文献
The complex rheological behavior of a simple yield stress fluid Orthogonal superposition rheometry of soft core–shell microgels Effect of urea on the linear and nonlinear rheological properties of human serum albumin hydrogels Swimming in viscoplastic fluids Discrepancies in dynamic yield stress measurements of cement pastes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1