Stephen A. Stearns, Clay B. Beagles, Katherine Hegermiller, C. Harper
{"title":"Impact of COVID-19 on hand surgery transfers at a level-1 trauma center","authors":"Stephen A. Stearns, Clay B. Beagles, Katherine Hegermiller, C. Harper","doi":"10.1097/BCO.0000000000001203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The COVID-19 pandemic significantly impacted elective surgical volume across the country; however, its effect on urgent transfers is unclear. This study sought to understand the impact of COVID-19 on transfers for hand surgery evaluation at a single quaternary referral center during the initial 3 mo of state mandated restrictions. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed comparing the rate and character of transfers for hand surgery evaluation from March to June of 2020 to a temporally matched cohort averaged across 2018 and 2019. The primary outcome of this study was transfer frequency, with secondary outcomes of treatment rendered and type of disposition. Results: The rate of transfer between emergency departments for hand surgery evaluation was not statistically different from before to during COVID (ED-to-ED transfer rate: 4.3% and 5.1% respectively, P=0.68). Patient demographics were similar, with no difference in age (pre-COVID-19 mean 48.6 yr vs. intra-COVID-19 mean 53.2 yr, P=0.31) or type of insurance (P=0.99). Regarding reason for transfer, both cohorts were similar in the number of transfers for trauma versus infection (pre-COVID-19 infection: 11 trauma: 20.5 vs. intra-COVID-19 infection: 4 trauma: 17 P=0.99). We observed similar rates of transfers requiring procedural intervention (pre-COVID-19 69.8% vs. intra-COVID-19 57.1% P=0.19). Lastly, there was no difference in admission patterns, with pre-COVID-19 rates (71.4%) similar to those during COVID-19 (52%) P=0.15. Conclusions: Despite the many changes to healthcare in the US during the COVID-19 pandemic, the practice of transferring for evaluation to a Level 1 hand surgery center was similar to pre-pandemic years. Level VI Evidence: Presenting a single descriptive study.","PeriodicalId":10732,"journal":{"name":"Current Orthopaedic Practice","volume":"34 1","pages":"103 - 105"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Orthopaedic Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BCO.0000000000001203","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The COVID-19 pandemic significantly impacted elective surgical volume across the country; however, its effect on urgent transfers is unclear. This study sought to understand the impact of COVID-19 on transfers for hand surgery evaluation at a single quaternary referral center during the initial 3 mo of state mandated restrictions. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed comparing the rate and character of transfers for hand surgery evaluation from March to June of 2020 to a temporally matched cohort averaged across 2018 and 2019. The primary outcome of this study was transfer frequency, with secondary outcomes of treatment rendered and type of disposition. Results: The rate of transfer between emergency departments for hand surgery evaluation was not statistically different from before to during COVID (ED-to-ED transfer rate: 4.3% and 5.1% respectively, P=0.68). Patient demographics were similar, with no difference in age (pre-COVID-19 mean 48.6 yr vs. intra-COVID-19 mean 53.2 yr, P=0.31) or type of insurance (P=0.99). Regarding reason for transfer, both cohorts were similar in the number of transfers for trauma versus infection (pre-COVID-19 infection: 11 trauma: 20.5 vs. intra-COVID-19 infection: 4 trauma: 17 P=0.99). We observed similar rates of transfers requiring procedural intervention (pre-COVID-19 69.8% vs. intra-COVID-19 57.1% P=0.19). Lastly, there was no difference in admission patterns, with pre-COVID-19 rates (71.4%) similar to those during COVID-19 (52%) P=0.15. Conclusions: Despite the many changes to healthcare in the US during the COVID-19 pandemic, the practice of transferring for evaluation to a Level 1 hand surgery center was similar to pre-pandemic years. Level VI Evidence: Presenting a single descriptive study.
期刊介绍:
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins is a leading international publisher of professional health information for physicians, nurses, specialized clinicians and students. For a complete listing of titles currently published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and detailed information about print, online, and other offerings, please visit the LWW Online Store. Current Orthopaedic Practice is a peer-reviewed, general orthopaedic journal that translates clinical research into best practices for diagnosing, treating, and managing musculoskeletal disorders. The journal publishes original articles in the form of clinical research, invited special focus reviews and general reviews, as well as original articles on innovations in practice, case reports, point/counterpoint, and diagnostic imaging.