A qualitative study of illness narratives: ‘overcoming the monster’ master plot for patients with stroke

Rana Alawafi, Sheeba Rosewilliam, A. Soundy
{"title":"A qualitative study of illness narratives: ‘overcoming the monster’ master plot for patients with stroke","authors":"Rana Alawafi, Sheeba Rosewilliam, A. Soundy","doi":"10.12968/ijtr.2021.0131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research that considers illness narrative ‘master plots’ (common and recognisable story plots related to the experience of illness), as expressed by individuals who have had a stroke, is needed Thus far, the literature has focused on identifying pre-established illness narrative master plots: the restitution, the chaos and the quest narrative. However, these narrative plots represent extreme psychological responses to the experience of illness; other narratives need to be understood in order to most effectively support individuals with stroke. Further research must identify if other master plots exist, and consider the implication of such plots. A narrative methodology was undertaken, contextualised within a social constructivist worldview. A purposive sample of individuals with stroke undertook a single online semi-structured interview. A categorical-form narrative analysis was undertaken in five stages. A total of eight individuals were interviewed. Following analysis, six individuals were identified as illustrating experiences related to a master plot termed ‘overcoming the monster’. The ‘monster’ was represented in several ways, which included: a mental health problem or an expression relating to internal feelings; a sense of being isolated from others; a threat to the individual's independence; and a negative interaction or experience related to health care. Individuals identified clear strategies for ‘overcoming the monster’. These included: adopting a different way of viewing life; identifying and attaining both big and small goals; persistence and determination in the face of adversity; and giving support to others through activities and receiving support. Allied health professionals need to understand the importance of this narrativisation of stroke because research has shown that allied health professionals can stereotype interactions by plots and seek to correct them. Implications of these findings ilustate the importance of understanding the individuals experience, not immediately reacting to a narrative type that may seem to fit, understanding the plot of overcoming the monster varies and may need time to be observed.","PeriodicalId":46562,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12968/ijtr.2021.0131","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Research that considers illness narrative ‘master plots’ (common and recognisable story plots related to the experience of illness), as expressed by individuals who have had a stroke, is needed Thus far, the literature has focused on identifying pre-established illness narrative master plots: the restitution, the chaos and the quest narrative. However, these narrative plots represent extreme psychological responses to the experience of illness; other narratives need to be understood in order to most effectively support individuals with stroke. Further research must identify if other master plots exist, and consider the implication of such plots. A narrative methodology was undertaken, contextualised within a social constructivist worldview. A purposive sample of individuals with stroke undertook a single online semi-structured interview. A categorical-form narrative analysis was undertaken in five stages. A total of eight individuals were interviewed. Following analysis, six individuals were identified as illustrating experiences related to a master plot termed ‘overcoming the monster’. The ‘monster’ was represented in several ways, which included: a mental health problem or an expression relating to internal feelings; a sense of being isolated from others; a threat to the individual's independence; and a negative interaction or experience related to health care. Individuals identified clear strategies for ‘overcoming the monster’. These included: adopting a different way of viewing life; identifying and attaining both big and small goals; persistence and determination in the face of adversity; and giving support to others through activities and receiving support. Allied health professionals need to understand the importance of this narrativisation of stroke because research has shown that allied health professionals can stereotype interactions by plots and seek to correct them. Implications of these findings ilustate the importance of understanding the individuals experience, not immediately reacting to a narrative type that may seem to fit, understanding the plot of overcoming the monster varies and may need time to be observed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
疾病叙事的定性研究:中风患者“战胜怪物”的主情节
需要将中风患者所表达的疾病叙事视为“主情节”(与疾病经历相关的常见且可识别的故事情节)的研究。到目前为止,文献集中于确定预先确立的疾病叙事主情节:恢复、混乱和追求叙事。然而,这些叙事情节代表了对疾病经历的极端心理反应;为了最有效地支持中风患者,需要理解其他叙述。进一步的研究必须确定是否存在其他主情节,并考虑这些情节的含义。在社会建构主义世界观的背景下,采用了叙事方法。一个有目的的中风患者样本进行了一次在线半结构化访谈。分类形式叙事分析分五个阶段进行。共采访了八个人。经过分析,六个人被确定为与一个被称为“战胜怪物”的主情节有关的经历。“怪物”有几种表现方式,包括:心理健康问题或与内心感受有关的表达;与他人隔绝的感觉;对个人独立性的威胁;以及与医疗保健相关的负面互动或体验。个人确定了“战胜怪物”的明确策略。其中包括:采用不同的方式看待生活;确定并实现大小目标;面对逆境时的坚持和决心;通过活动给予他人支持并获得支持。联合卫生专业人员需要理解这种对中风的叙述的重要性,因为研究表明,联合卫生专业人士可以通过情节来刻板印象互动,并试图纠正它们。这些发现的含义阐明了理解个人经历的重要性,而不是立即对似乎合适的叙事类型做出反应,理解克服怪物的情节各不相同,可能需要时间来观察。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
40.00%
发文量
56
期刊介绍: International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation (IJTR) publishes original research, providing a platform for the latest key research findings in therapy and rehabilitation. Review and analysis articles are invited internationally to enable the sharing of practices and developments worldwide, and to raise awareness of different cultural influences in health care. IJTR provides an interdisciplinary approach to therapy and rehabilitation by: -Providing a well-referenced source of information to all professionals involved in therapy and rehabilitation worldwide, including occupational therapists, physiotherapists, chiropodists and podiatrists, radiographers, speech and language therapists and orthoptists -Providing a peer-reviewed source of original research and information presented in an accessible, informative and professional medium -Providing a forum for the discussion of new ideas, information and issues relating to therapy and rehabilitation -Creating an awareness of the national and international issues affecting professionals involved in therapy and rehabilitation -Encouraging collaboration and sharing of new ideas between professions worldwide
期刊最新文献
The relationships between upper extremity muscle strength and endurance with respiratory function, functional capacity and quality of life in children and adolescents with cystic fibrosis Predicting outcomes, describing complications and optimising rehabilitation in patients undergoing lung transplantation Integrating the wrist-worn tracker in cardiac rehabilitation programmes: a scoping review Amplitude training in occupational therapy for the treatment of Parkinson's disease: a feasibility study Comparing the reliability of the Goniometer Pro application and flexicurve for measuring thoracic kyphosis: a cross-sectional study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1