{"title":"The Political Theory of Neo-Slavophilism: Politics Without Politicians","authors":"K. A. Solov’ev","doi":"10.1080/10611983.2021.1916318","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the main tenets of the political theory of Neo-Slavophilism is an affirmation of the freedom of society from the grueling day-to-day routine of politics and, hence, from all the problems related to the allocation of authority and its duties. This human freedom is guaranteed by an autocrat who has taken the heavy burden of decision making upon himself. But by fleeing from politics, society risks ending up in its “hot embrace”: in any case, it needs guarantees against abuses by the authorities. This was a kind of intellectual challenge to NeoSlavophilism: proposing a mechanism of limitations on unlimited authority and setting boundaries for political space through the efforts of an apolitical society. And unlike the poetic mode of the founding fathers of Slavophilism, the style of thought of the Neo-Slavophiles suited the execution of this task quite well. Since it was “technological” to the maximum degree, their thought was focused on a detailed design of the future organization of authority.","PeriodicalId":89267,"journal":{"name":"Russian studies in history","volume":"59 1","pages":"63 - 73"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Russian studies in history","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10611983.2021.1916318","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
One of the main tenets of the political theory of Neo-Slavophilism is an affirmation of the freedom of society from the grueling day-to-day routine of politics and, hence, from all the problems related to the allocation of authority and its duties. This human freedom is guaranteed by an autocrat who has taken the heavy burden of decision making upon himself. But by fleeing from politics, society risks ending up in its “hot embrace”: in any case, it needs guarantees against abuses by the authorities. This was a kind of intellectual challenge to NeoSlavophilism: proposing a mechanism of limitations on unlimited authority and setting boundaries for political space through the efforts of an apolitical society. And unlike the poetic mode of the founding fathers of Slavophilism, the style of thought of the Neo-Slavophiles suited the execution of this task quite well. Since it was “technological” to the maximum degree, their thought was focused on a detailed design of the future organization of authority.