Clinical Phenotyping with an Outcomes-driven Mixture of Experts for Patient Matching and Risk Estimation.

ACM transactions on computing for healthcare Pub Date : 2023-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-13 DOI:10.1145/3616021
Nathan C Hurley, Sanket S Dhruva, Nihar R Desai, Joseph R Ross, Che G Ngufor, Frederick Masoudi, Harlan M Krumholz, Bobak J Mortazavi
{"title":"Clinical Phenotyping with an Outcomes-driven Mixture of Experts for Patient Matching and Risk Estimation.","authors":"Nathan C Hurley, Sanket S Dhruva, Nihar R Desai, Joseph R Ross, Che G Ngufor, Frederick Masoudi, Harlan M Krumholz, Bobak J Mortazavi","doi":"10.1145/3616021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Observational medical data present unique opportunities for analysis of medical outcomes and treatment decision making. However, because these datasets do not contain the strict pairing of randomized control trials, matching techniques are to draw comparisons among patients. A key limitation to such techniques is verification that the variables used to model treatment decision making are also relevant in identifying the risk of major adverse events. This article explores a deep mixture of experts approach to jointly learn how to match patients and model the risk of major adverse events in patients. Although trained with information regarding treatment and outcomes, after training, the proposed model is decomposable into a network that clusters patients into phenotypes from information available before treatment. This model is validated on a dataset of patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. The mixture of experts approach can predict the outcome of mortality with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.85 ± 0.01 while jointly discovering five potential phenotypes of interest. The technique and interpretation allow for identifying clinically relevant phenotypes that may be used both for outcomes modeling as well as potentially evaluating individualized treatment effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":72043,"journal":{"name":"ACM transactions on computing for healthcare","volume":" ","pages":"1-18"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10613929/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM transactions on computing for healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3616021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Observational medical data present unique opportunities for analysis of medical outcomes and treatment decision making. However, because these datasets do not contain the strict pairing of randomized control trials, matching techniques are to draw comparisons among patients. A key limitation to such techniques is verification that the variables used to model treatment decision making are also relevant in identifying the risk of major adverse events. This article explores a deep mixture of experts approach to jointly learn how to match patients and model the risk of major adverse events in patients. Although trained with information regarding treatment and outcomes, after training, the proposed model is decomposable into a network that clusters patients into phenotypes from information available before treatment. This model is validated on a dataset of patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. The mixture of experts approach can predict the outcome of mortality with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.85 ± 0.01 while jointly discovering five potential phenotypes of interest. The technique and interpretation allow for identifying clinically relevant phenotypes that may be used both for outcomes modeling as well as potentially evaluating individualized treatment effects.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于结果驱动的患者匹配和风险评估专家混合的临床表型
观察性医学数据为分析医疗结果和治疗决策提供了独特的机会。然而,由于这些数据集不包含随机对照试验的严格配对,配对技术是为了在患者之间进行比较。这种技术的一个关键限制是验证用于模拟治疗决策的变量也与确定主要不良事件的风险相关。本文探讨了一种深度混合的专家方法,共同学习如何匹配患者并模拟患者主要不良事件的风险。虽然训练了有关治疗和结果的信息,但在训练之后,所提出的模型可分解成一个网络,该网络根据治疗前可用的信息将患者聚类为表型。该模型在急性心肌梗死合并心源性休克患者的数据集上得到了验证。专家混合法在共同发现5种潜在感兴趣表型的同时,预测死亡率的结果在受试者工作特征曲线下的面积为0.85±0.01。该技术和解释允许识别临床相关表型,这些表型可用于结果建模以及潜在的评估个体化治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A method for comparing time series by untangling time-dependent and independent variations in biological processes AI-assisted Diagnosing, Monitoring, and Treatment of Mental Disorders: A Survey HEalthRecordBERT (HERBERT): leveraging transformers on electronic health records for chronic kidney disease risk stratification iScan: Detection of Colorectal Cancer From CT Scan Images Using Deep Learning A Computation Model to Estimate Interaction Intensity through Non-verbal Behavioral Cues: A Case Study of Intimate Couples under the Impact of Acute Alcohol Consumption
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1