Susanne Baur, A. Nauels, Zebedee R. J. Nicholls, B. Sanderson, C. Schleussner
{"title":"The deployment length of solar radiation modification: an interplay of mitigation, net-negative emissions and climate uncertainty","authors":"Susanne Baur, A. Nauels, Zebedee R. J. Nicholls, B. Sanderson, C. Schleussner","doi":"10.5194/esd-14-367-2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. A growing body of literature investigates the effects of solar\nradiation modification (SRM) on global and regional climates. Previous\nstudies have focused on the potentials and the side effects of SRM, with little\nattention being given to possible deployment timescales and the levels of carbon\ndioxide removal required for a phase out. Here, we investigate the\ndeployment timescales of SRM and how they are affected by different levels\nof mitigation, net-negative emissions (NNEs) and climate uncertainty. We\ngenerate a large dataset of 355 emission scenarios in which SRM is deployed\nto keep warming levels at 1.5 ∘C global mean temperature.\nProbabilistic climate projections from this ensemble result in a large range\nof plausible future warming and cooling rates that lead to various SRM\ndeployment timescales. In all pathways consistent with extrapolated current\nambition, SRM deployment would exceed 100 years even under the most\noptimistic assumptions regarding climate response. As soon as the temperature\nthreshold is exceeded, neither mitigation nor NNEs or climate sensitivity\nalone can guarantee short deployment timescales. Since the evolution of\nmitigation under SRM, the availability of carbon removal technologies and\nthe effects of climate reversibility will be mostly unknown at its\ninitialisation time, it is impossible to predict how temporary SRM\ndeployment would be. Any deployment of SRM therefore comes with the risk of\nmulti-century legacies of deployment, implying multi-generational\ncommitments of costs, risks and negative side effects of SRM and NNEs\ncombined.\n","PeriodicalId":92775,"journal":{"name":"Earth system dynamics : ESD","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earth system dynamics : ESD","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-14-367-2023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
Abstract. A growing body of literature investigates the effects of solar
radiation modification (SRM) on global and regional climates. Previous
studies have focused on the potentials and the side effects of SRM, with little
attention being given to possible deployment timescales and the levels of carbon
dioxide removal required for a phase out. Here, we investigate the
deployment timescales of SRM and how they are affected by different levels
of mitigation, net-negative emissions (NNEs) and climate uncertainty. We
generate a large dataset of 355 emission scenarios in which SRM is deployed
to keep warming levels at 1.5 ∘C global mean temperature.
Probabilistic climate projections from this ensemble result in a large range
of plausible future warming and cooling rates that lead to various SRM
deployment timescales. In all pathways consistent with extrapolated current
ambition, SRM deployment would exceed 100 years even under the most
optimistic assumptions regarding climate response. As soon as the temperature
threshold is exceeded, neither mitigation nor NNEs or climate sensitivity
alone can guarantee short deployment timescales. Since the evolution of
mitigation under SRM, the availability of carbon removal technologies and
the effects of climate reversibility will be mostly unknown at its
initialisation time, it is impossible to predict how temporary SRM
deployment would be. Any deployment of SRM therefore comes with the risk of
multi-century legacies of deployment, implying multi-generational
commitments of costs, risks and negative side effects of SRM and NNEs
combined.