Is there a correlation between cognition and the ability to remember how to use assistive devices?

Q3 Health Professions Irish Journal of Occupational Therapy Pub Date : 2019-05-07 DOI:10.1108/IJOT-11-2018-0019
Gerard Mc Carroll, M. Cooke
{"title":"Is there a correlation between cognition and the ability to remember how to use assistive devices?","authors":"Gerard Mc Carroll, M. Cooke","doi":"10.1108/IJOT-11-2018-0019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis study aims to establish a correlation between a patient’s mini mental state examination (MMSE) score and their ability to remember how to use common assistive dressing devices.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe study was a prospective, cross-sectional and correlational study. A final sample of 63 patients formed the study. Patients’ cognition was measured using the MMSE, and a new assessment tool was developed to assess patients’ ability to use three assistive devices and piloted on 15 patients to address normality, reliability, validity and clinical usefulness. Pearson’s rank correlation coefficient was used to establish direct correlations between the MMSE score and the assessment tool score. Eta squared was used to calculate the effect size to achieve an indication of the difference between the groups. Ethical approval had been granted by the regional ethics committee. The null hypothesis states that patients with an MMSE score of 22 or less show no difference in their ability to safely and appropriately use assistive devices provided and demonstrated by an occupational therapist than patients with an MMSE score of 23 or higher.\n\n\nFindings\nThe null hypothesis was rejected and patients with an MMSE score of 22 or less showed a significant difficulty in their ability to use the three devices. Correlation coefficients showed significant positive correlations between MMSE scores and assistive devices scoring tool results for all three devices: Helping hand (r = 6.677, n = 60, p = 0.01), shoe horn (r = 0.649, n = 54, p = 0.01) and sock aid (r = 0.877, n = 54, p = 0.01).\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe study is in an Irish context and demonstrated primary, objective evidence of the impact of impaired cognition on functional ability. Patients with cognitive deficits pose a larger safety challenge but still should be afforded an opportunity to use and benefit from assistive devices. The assessment tool is a new and unique instrument and although requires further development, may conceivably act not just as an assessment instrument but also an effective treatment tool.\n","PeriodicalId":36571,"journal":{"name":"Irish Journal of Occupational Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Irish Journal of Occupational Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOT-11-2018-0019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to establish a correlation between a patient’s mini mental state examination (MMSE) score and their ability to remember how to use common assistive dressing devices. Design/methodology/approach The study was a prospective, cross-sectional and correlational study. A final sample of 63 patients formed the study. Patients’ cognition was measured using the MMSE, and a new assessment tool was developed to assess patients’ ability to use three assistive devices and piloted on 15 patients to address normality, reliability, validity and clinical usefulness. Pearson’s rank correlation coefficient was used to establish direct correlations between the MMSE score and the assessment tool score. Eta squared was used to calculate the effect size to achieve an indication of the difference between the groups. Ethical approval had been granted by the regional ethics committee. The null hypothesis states that patients with an MMSE score of 22 or less show no difference in their ability to safely and appropriately use assistive devices provided and demonstrated by an occupational therapist than patients with an MMSE score of 23 or higher. Findings The null hypothesis was rejected and patients with an MMSE score of 22 or less showed a significant difficulty in their ability to use the three devices. Correlation coefficients showed significant positive correlations between MMSE scores and assistive devices scoring tool results for all three devices: Helping hand (r = 6.677, n = 60, p = 0.01), shoe horn (r = 0.649, n = 54, p = 0.01) and sock aid (r = 0.877, n = 54, p = 0.01). Originality/value The study is in an Irish context and demonstrated primary, objective evidence of the impact of impaired cognition on functional ability. Patients with cognitive deficits pose a larger safety challenge but still should be afforded an opportunity to use and benefit from assistive devices. The assessment tool is a new and unique instrument and although requires further development, may conceivably act not just as an assessment instrument but also an effective treatment tool.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
认知能力和记忆如何使用辅助设备的能力之间是否存在相关性?
目的本研究旨在探讨患者迷你精神状态检查(MMSE)评分与常用辅助敷料装置使用记忆能力的相关性。设计/方法/方法本研究为前瞻性、横断面、相关性研究。63名患者的最终样本组成了这项研究。使用MMSE测量患者的认知,并开发了一种新的评估工具来评估患者使用三种辅助装置的能力,并在15例患者中进行了试点,以解决正常性,可靠性,有效性和临床有用性。使用Pearson等级相关系数建立MMSE得分与评估工具得分之间的直接相关性。使用平方来计算效应大小,以获得组间差异的指示。区域伦理委员会已经批准了该项研究。零假设表明,MMSE得分为22或更低的患者与MMSE得分为23或更高的患者相比,在安全、适当地使用由职业治疗师提供和证明的辅助器具的能力上没有差异。零假设被拒绝,MMSE评分为22或更低的患者在使用这三种设备的能力上表现出明显的困难。辅助器具的MMSE评分与辅助器具评分工具的结果呈显著正相关:助手(r = 6.677, n = 60, p = 0.01)、鞋角(r = 0.649, n = 54, p = 0.01)和袜子辅助器具(r = 0.877, n = 54, p = 0.01)。独创性/价值该研究在爱尔兰的背景下进行,并展示了认知受损对功能能力影响的主要客观证据。认知缺陷患者对安全性提出了更大的挑战,但仍应给予使用辅助装置的机会并从中受益。评估工具是一种新的和独特的工具,虽然需要进一步发展,但可以想象,它不仅是一种评估工具,而且是一种有效的治疗工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Irish Journal of Occupational Therapy
Irish Journal of Occupational Therapy Health Professions-Occupational Therapy
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Editorial: Driving innovation: harnessing the power of patient input in research Current clinical practice of Irish physiotherapists and occupational therapists in the assessment and treatment of spasticity in adults Scoping review of free evidence summary sources available online, relevant to occupational therapists working with children/youth, and families Exploring the non-vocational outcomes of the individual placement and support (IPS) employment model Attention Autism™ training for occupational therapists: a pilot study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1