{"title":"After Peele: Get Out’s Influence on the Horror Genre and Beyond","authors":"Mikal J. Gaines","doi":"10.1080/10436928.2023.2166306","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In a 2021 article for The New York Times, Gabrielle Bellot seeks to explain “How Black Horror Became America’s Most Powerful Cinematic Genre.” The lead image features a now iconic close-up of Chris (Daniel Kaluuya), the protagonist of Jordan Peele’s Get Out, paralyzed with fear. His eyes appear almost grotesquely widened, his mouth hangs agape, and tears stream down his face. The moment, of course, comes from one of the film’s most powerful scenes in which Chris gets hypnotized and then cast down into “the sunken place,” a metaphysical plane of Black subjection that has since become pop culture shorthand for endemic racial oppression. Peele’s landmark feature has already prompted a considerable body of scholarly analysis from critics such as Joshua Bennett, Dawn Keetley et al., Alison Landsberg, Isabel Cristina Pinedo, Francesca Sobande, and others. Although these studies offer a rich array of critical interpretations, they all confirm that Get Out marks a vital moment in the history of horror because of how it centers the inner life of its Black protagonist and because of the incisiveness with which it targets liberal white racism as a source of monstrosity. As Robin Means Coleman has argued, Black horror films can be distinguished from “Blacks in horror” films by the former’s prioritization of Black experience, characters, culture, community concerns, and more careful attention to the fraught history of raced representation both within and beyond the genre (7). Get Out indeed goes to great lengths to present itself as a Black horror film invested in Blackness (and in Black audiences) rather than as a Blacks in horror film that likely would not have resonated in the same ways. In this essay, however, I am less interested in offering another reading of Get Out than in further exploring its impact on the horror genre more broadly. Could we have even imagined an article title like Bellot’s prior to Get Out’s release? Would any critic have been willing to make such an audacious claim about the power of any single cinematic genre as Bellot does if not for Get Out’s momentous critical and commercial success? The answer seems like an emphatic no. Bellot’s","PeriodicalId":42717,"journal":{"name":"LIT-Literature Interpretation Theory","volume":"33 1","pages":"254 - 276"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LIT-Literature Interpretation Theory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10436928.2023.2166306","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In a 2021 article for The New York Times, Gabrielle Bellot seeks to explain “How Black Horror Became America’s Most Powerful Cinematic Genre.” The lead image features a now iconic close-up of Chris (Daniel Kaluuya), the protagonist of Jordan Peele’s Get Out, paralyzed with fear. His eyes appear almost grotesquely widened, his mouth hangs agape, and tears stream down his face. The moment, of course, comes from one of the film’s most powerful scenes in which Chris gets hypnotized and then cast down into “the sunken place,” a metaphysical plane of Black subjection that has since become pop culture shorthand for endemic racial oppression. Peele’s landmark feature has already prompted a considerable body of scholarly analysis from critics such as Joshua Bennett, Dawn Keetley et al., Alison Landsberg, Isabel Cristina Pinedo, Francesca Sobande, and others. Although these studies offer a rich array of critical interpretations, they all confirm that Get Out marks a vital moment in the history of horror because of how it centers the inner life of its Black protagonist and because of the incisiveness with which it targets liberal white racism as a source of monstrosity. As Robin Means Coleman has argued, Black horror films can be distinguished from “Blacks in horror” films by the former’s prioritization of Black experience, characters, culture, community concerns, and more careful attention to the fraught history of raced representation both within and beyond the genre (7). Get Out indeed goes to great lengths to present itself as a Black horror film invested in Blackness (and in Black audiences) rather than as a Blacks in horror film that likely would not have resonated in the same ways. In this essay, however, I am less interested in offering another reading of Get Out than in further exploring its impact on the horror genre more broadly. Could we have even imagined an article title like Bellot’s prior to Get Out’s release? Would any critic have been willing to make such an audacious claim about the power of any single cinematic genre as Bellot does if not for Get Out’s momentous critical and commercial success? The answer seems like an emphatic no. Bellot’s
在《纽约时报》2021年的一篇文章中,加布里埃尔·贝洛特试图解释“黑色恐怖如何成为美国最强大的电影类型”。主图中有一个现在标志性的特写镜头,乔丹·皮尔的《滚蛋》中的主角克里斯(丹尼尔·卡卢亚饰)因恐惧而瘫痪。他的眼睛似乎奇怪地睁大了,张着嘴,眼泪顺着脸流了下来。当然,这一刻来自电影中最有力的场景之一,在这个场景中,克里斯被催眠,然后被扔到“沉没的地方”,这是一个黑人服从的形而上学平面,后来成为流行文化中地方性种族压迫的代名词。皮尔的里程碑式特征已经引起了约书亚·贝内特、道恩·基特利等人、艾莉森·兰茨伯格、伊莎贝尔·克里斯蒂娜·皮内多、弗朗西斯卡·索班德等人等评论家的大量学术分析。尽管这些研究提供了丰富的批判性解释,但它们都证实,《脱身》标志着恐怖史上的一个重要时刻,因为它以黑人主人公的内心生活为中心,也因为它尖锐地将自由白人种族主义作为怪物的来源。正如Robin Means Coleman所说,黑人恐怖电影可以与“恐怖中的黑人”电影区分开来,因为前者优先考虑黑人的经历、角色、文化、社区关切,并更加谨慎地关注种族代表在类型内外的令人担忧的历史(7)。《脱身》确实不遗余力地将自己呈现为一部黑人恐怖电影,投资于黑人(和黑人观众),而不是一部可能不会以同样方式引起共鸣的恐怖电影中的黑人。然而,在这篇文章中,我对《滚蛋》的另一种解读不太感兴趣,而是更广泛地进一步探索它对恐怖类型的影响。在《滚蛋》发行之前,我们能想象出一个像贝洛那样的文章标题吗?如果不是因为《滚蛋》在评论和商业上取得了巨大成功,会有评论家愿意像贝洛那样大胆地宣称任何一种电影类型的力量吗?答案似乎是坚决否定的。贝洛的