{"title":"The History of Courts and Procedure in Medieval Canon Law by Wilfried Hartmann and Kenneth Pennington (review)","authors":"Gero Dolezalek","doi":"10.1353/BMC.2017.0011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This is a collection of twelve independent essays—and thus not a handbook which would systematically cover the entire field mentioned in the title. This implies that matters discussed by one author may at times also be taken up by another. In this regard, readers are assisted by a general index. All essays circle around the function of the medieval Western Church as a local arbiter or judge in local litigations. In the time period in question (1140 to 1500) this function of the Church was fulfilled relatively homogeneously in all geographical regions of Western Christianity. The uniformity is owing to the endeavour of the reform popes, from 1049 onward, who had set a broad homogenisation of the Western church in motion. The editors have wisely abstained from considering litigation which directly took place at the Holy See (thus before papal auditors, etc.). This would have needed much additional space, and it was not urgent, anyway, because sources and literature of direct litigation in the papal curia are sufficiently described elsewhere and commented on. The contributors have furthermore restricted the topic ‘inquisition into heresy’ to a few scant mentions—likewise for good reasons. Respective publications are extremely numerous. Already in 1963 a bibliography by Émile van der Vekene had","PeriodicalId":40554,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Medieval Canon Law-New Series","volume":"34 1","pages":"299 - 312"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/BMC.2017.0011","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Medieval Canon Law-New Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/BMC.2017.0011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This is a collection of twelve independent essays—and thus not a handbook which would systematically cover the entire field mentioned in the title. This implies that matters discussed by one author may at times also be taken up by another. In this regard, readers are assisted by a general index. All essays circle around the function of the medieval Western Church as a local arbiter or judge in local litigations. In the time period in question (1140 to 1500) this function of the Church was fulfilled relatively homogeneously in all geographical regions of Western Christianity. The uniformity is owing to the endeavour of the reform popes, from 1049 onward, who had set a broad homogenisation of the Western church in motion. The editors have wisely abstained from considering litigation which directly took place at the Holy See (thus before papal auditors, etc.). This would have needed much additional space, and it was not urgent, anyway, because sources and literature of direct litigation in the papal curia are sufficiently described elsewhere and commented on. The contributors have furthermore restricted the topic ‘inquisition into heresy’ to a few scant mentions—likewise for good reasons. Respective publications are extremely numerous. Already in 1963 a bibliography by Émile van der Vekene had
这是一本由十二篇独立文章组成的合集,因此不是一本系统地涵盖标题中提到的整个领域的手册。这意味着一位作者讨论的问题有时也可能被另一位作者处理。在这方面,读者得到了一个通用索引的帮助。所有的文章都围绕着中世纪西方教会在地方诉讼中作为地方仲裁者或法官的职能展开。在所讨论的时期(1140年至1500年),教会的这一职能在西方基督教的所有地理区域都得到了相对一致的履行。统一是由于1049年以后改革教皇的努力,他们推动了西方教会的广泛统一。编辑们明智地放弃了考虑直接在罗马教廷发生的诉讼(因此在教皇审计员等面前)。这需要更多的空间,无论如何,这并不紧迫,因为教皇法庭直接诉讼的来源和文献在其他地方有足够的描述和评论。撰稿人进一步将“异端调查”这一话题限制在很少提及的范围内,这也是有充分理由的。各自的出版物数量极多。早在1963年,Émile van der Vekene的一份参考书目