Music-Assisted Reminiscence Therapy with Older Adults: Feasibility, Acceptability, and Outcomes

IF 0.9 Q4 REHABILITATION Music Therapy Perspectives Pub Date : 2022-06-27 DOI:10.1093/mtp/miac021
Romy Engelbrecht, S. Bhar, J. Ciorciari
{"title":"Music-Assisted Reminiscence Therapy with Older Adults: Feasibility, Acceptability, and Outcomes","authors":"Romy Engelbrecht, S. Bhar, J. Ciorciari","doi":"10.1093/mtp/miac021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Reminiscence therapy (RT) is often used in music therapy; however, it remains unclear how music can be integrated within this therapy. This pilot study aimed to contrast the user experience and acceptability of RT with and without music. Eight older adults experiencing symptoms of anxiety and/or depression were randomly allocated to a single session of either verbal RT (VRT) or music-assisted RT (MRT). Pre- and post-measures of affect (Positive and Negative Affect Scale) and memory (Memory Experience Questionnaire, Short Form) were administered to compare VRT and MRT, followed by a brief semi-structured interview to understand the participants’ experiences and level of satisfaction. Interviews were qualitatively analyzed using an inductive coding approach. Two MRT protocols were also delivered to examine different ways of embedding music into RT and compared using qualitative interview data. Participants reported that VRT and MRT were equally acceptable and well tolerated. All participants completed the VRT or MRT session. Participants were able to identify a song to listen to in both MRT protocols and found both acceptable. A pre–post pattern of improvement was observed for affect following VRT, and particularly MRT, suggesting both as promising interventions. The high treatment fidelity achieved in this study indicates that the interventions can be successfully implemented with this population. MRT resulted in higher scores on memory experience characteristics, such as vividness, coherence, and accessibility, and, therefore, may provide changes above and beyond VRT for older people experiencing psychological distress, suggesting that large-scale clinical trials are warranted.","PeriodicalId":44813,"journal":{"name":"Music Therapy Perspectives","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Music Therapy Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/mtp/miac021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Reminiscence therapy (RT) is often used in music therapy; however, it remains unclear how music can be integrated within this therapy. This pilot study aimed to contrast the user experience and acceptability of RT with and without music. Eight older adults experiencing symptoms of anxiety and/or depression were randomly allocated to a single session of either verbal RT (VRT) or music-assisted RT (MRT). Pre- and post-measures of affect (Positive and Negative Affect Scale) and memory (Memory Experience Questionnaire, Short Form) were administered to compare VRT and MRT, followed by a brief semi-structured interview to understand the participants’ experiences and level of satisfaction. Interviews were qualitatively analyzed using an inductive coding approach. Two MRT protocols were also delivered to examine different ways of embedding music into RT and compared using qualitative interview data. Participants reported that VRT and MRT were equally acceptable and well tolerated. All participants completed the VRT or MRT session. Participants were able to identify a song to listen to in both MRT protocols and found both acceptable. A pre–post pattern of improvement was observed for affect following VRT, and particularly MRT, suggesting both as promising interventions. The high treatment fidelity achieved in this study indicates that the interventions can be successfully implemented with this population. MRT resulted in higher scores on memory experience characteristics, such as vividness, coherence, and accessibility, and, therefore, may provide changes above and beyond VRT for older people experiencing psychological distress, suggesting that large-scale clinical trials are warranted.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
音乐辅助的老年人回忆疗法:可行性、可接受性和结果
回忆疗法(RT)常用于音乐治疗;然而,目前尚不清楚音乐如何与这种疗法相结合。这项初步研究的目的是对比用户体验和接受RT有和没有音乐。8名出现焦虑和/或抑郁症状的老年人被随机分配到口头RT (VRT)或音乐辅助RT (MRT)的单次会话中。研究人员对被试进行了情绪(积极和消极情绪量表)和记忆(记忆体验问卷,简短形式)的前后测量,以比较VRT和MRT,随后进行了简短的半结构化访谈,以了解被试的体验和满意度。使用归纳编码方法对访谈进行定性分析。我们还提供了两种MRT协议,以检验将音乐嵌入RT的不同方式,并使用定性访谈数据进行比较。参与者报告VRT和MRT同样可接受且耐受性良好。所有参与者都完成了VRT或MRT测试。参与者能够在两种MRT协议中识别出要听的歌曲,并发现两者都是可以接受的。在VRT,特别是MRT后,观察到一种改善的前后模式,表明两者都是有希望的干预措施。本研究中获得的高治疗保真度表明干预措施可以成功地在这一人群中实施。MRT在记忆体验特征(如生动性、连贯性和可及性)上得分更高,因此,可能为经历心理困扰的老年人提供高于VRT的改变,这表明大规模的临床试验是有必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Music Therapy Perspectives
Music Therapy Perspectives REHABILITATION-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
16.70%
发文量
22
期刊最新文献
Supporting Music Therapy Majors with Mental Health Conditions Ethical Considerations in Co-Authoring Research with Music Therapy Stakeholders Making Mistakes Together: Therapy Participant, Parent, and Therapist Perspectives on Music Therapy in Two Different Settings Exploring Different Types of Music Cues for Arm Movements in Adults with Parkinson’s Correction to: Language Discordance in Music Therapy: A Phenomenological Study of Delivering Music Therapy Services with Interpreters
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1