Does therapeutic plasma exchange have a role in resistant cytokine storm state of COVID-19 infection?

Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1080/20905068.2021.1987111
Mohamed Mamdouh Elsayed, M. Zeid, A. Fayed, Ehab Elreweny, N. H. Zakaria, A. Baess
{"title":"Does therapeutic plasma exchange have a role in resistant cytokine storm state of COVID-19 infection?","authors":"Mohamed Mamdouh Elsayed, M. Zeid, A. Fayed, Ehab Elreweny, N. H. Zakaria, A. Baess","doi":"10.1080/20905068.2021.1987111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Introduction Among the main causes of mortality in COVID-19 patients is cytokine storm (CS) state. Few treatment options with variable efficacy results are available for its management. We aimed to illustrate the efficacy of Therapeutic Plasma Exchange (TPE) treatment in COVID-19 patients with resistant CS. Material and methods This research is a prospective pilot study which included ten COVID-19 positive patients with CS state with no response after two doses of tocilizumab. Each patient received three to five TPE sessions according to his/her response. Respiratory status {oxygen (O2) requirements and data of mechanical ventilation} and laboratory markers (IL-6, CRP, ferritin, D dimer, LDH) were assessed before and after TPE. We reported mortality at 28 day of illness. Results Six males and four females were enrolled in the study with a mean age of (52.9 years). Seven patients (70%) were on mechanical ventilation (MV). After TPE, oxygenation parameters and most laboratory markers improved significantly in all patients (p < 0.05). Four patients survived and were discharged (40%). One was on MV and three were not. The four patients had better hypoxic index (PaO2/FiO2 ratio) (˃100 vs <100), started TPE sooner after tocilizumab failure (2–3 vs 5–6 days), needed fewer TPE sessions (3 vs 4–5, p = 0.03), and less duration in ICU (6.5 vs 12.5 days) compared to those who did not benefit. Conclusions In patients with CS state who did not respond well to tocilizumab and steroids, TPE could be a good option. Larger randomized clinical trials are needed to support its use. Clinical trials registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:NCT04457349","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20905068.2021.1987111","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT Introduction Among the main causes of mortality in COVID-19 patients is cytokine storm (CS) state. Few treatment options with variable efficacy results are available for its management. We aimed to illustrate the efficacy of Therapeutic Plasma Exchange (TPE) treatment in COVID-19 patients with resistant CS. Material and methods This research is a prospective pilot study which included ten COVID-19 positive patients with CS state with no response after two doses of tocilizumab. Each patient received three to five TPE sessions according to his/her response. Respiratory status {oxygen (O2) requirements and data of mechanical ventilation} and laboratory markers (IL-6, CRP, ferritin, D dimer, LDH) were assessed before and after TPE. We reported mortality at 28 day of illness. Results Six males and four females were enrolled in the study with a mean age of (52.9 years). Seven patients (70%) were on mechanical ventilation (MV). After TPE, oxygenation parameters and most laboratory markers improved significantly in all patients (p < 0.05). Four patients survived and were discharged (40%). One was on MV and three were not. The four patients had better hypoxic index (PaO2/FiO2 ratio) (˃100 vs <100), started TPE sooner after tocilizumab failure (2–3 vs 5–6 days), needed fewer TPE sessions (3 vs 4–5, p = 0.03), and less duration in ICU (6.5 vs 12.5 days) compared to those who did not benefit. Conclusions In patients with CS state who did not respond well to tocilizumab and steroids, TPE could be a good option. Larger randomized clinical trials are needed to support its use. Clinical trials registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:NCT04457349
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
治疗性血浆置换在COVID-19感染的耐药细胞因子风暴状态中是否有作用?
细胞因子风暴(cytokine storm, CS)状态是导致COVID-19患者死亡的主要原因之一。很少有不同疗效结果的治疗方案可用于其管理。我们旨在说明治疗性血浆置换(TPE)治疗对COVID-19耐药CS患者的疗效。材料和方法本研究是一项前瞻性先导研究,纳入了10例COVID-19阳性CS状态患者,两剂tocilizumab治疗后无反应。根据患者的反应,每位患者接受3 - 5次TPE治疗。评估TPE前后呼吸状态{氧(O2)需氧量和机械通气数据}及实验室标志物(IL-6、CRP、铁蛋白、D二聚体、LDH)。我们报告了发病28天的死亡率。结果男性6例,女性4例,平均年龄52.9岁。7例患者(70%)采用机械通气。TPE后患者氧合参数及大部分实验室指标均有显著改善(p < 0.05)。4例患者存活出院(40%)。一个在MV上,三个不在。这4名患者的缺氧指数(PaO2/FiO2比值)较低(≤100 vs <100),在托珠单抗失败后更早开始TPE(2-3天vs 5-6天),需要更少的TPE疗程(3天vs 4-5天,p = 0.03),在ICU的持续时间较短(6.5天vs 12.5天)。结论:对于对托珠单抗和类固醇反应不佳的CS患者,TPE可能是一个很好的选择。需要更大规模的随机临床试验来支持其使用。临床试验注册ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT04457349
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1