High-Tone External Muscle Stimulation for the Treatment of Chronic Sciatica – A Randomized Controlled Crossover Trial

Q3 Medicine Open Pain Journal Pub Date : 2018-12-24 DOI:10.2174/1876386301811010021
K. Kempf, M. Röhling, E. Darwish, Stephan Martin, S. Jander, J. Herdmann, S. Stehr-Zirngibl
{"title":"High-Tone External Muscle Stimulation for the Treatment of Chronic Sciatica – A Randomized Controlled Crossover Trial","authors":"K. Kempf, M. Röhling, E. Darwish, Stephan Martin, S. Jander, J. Herdmann, S. Stehr-Zirngibl","doi":"10.2174/1876386301811010021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Chronic sciatica is a common pathology with a lifetime prevalence of 84%. Current therapy options are inadequate or not long-lasting.\n \n \n \n Evaluation of short-term application of High-Tone Electrical Muscle Stimulation (HTEMS) compared to Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) with chronic sciatica.\n \n \n \n Patients (n=100, (mean±SD) age=57±14 years, sex=42% male) with chronic sciatica were randomly assigned into two groups treated with either HTEMS or TENS. Each treatment was administered for a period of 45 min per day, 5 times within 7 days, with a 7-day wash-out period before crossover. A 5-day average of sciatic pain was assessed using the visual analog scale (VAS) before and after intervention. Drug administration was stable during the study.\n \n \n \n Before crossover, pain intensity was significantly reduced by the HTEMS treatment (56±21 (60 [50-70]) to 45±21 (50 [30-60]) mm VAS; p<0.001), while no improvement occurred with TENS (59±19 (60 [50-70]) to 56±19 (60 [45-79]) mm VAS). After crossover, significant pain reduction was observed in both groups (both p <0.01) and did not differ between both groups after the whole intervention.\n \n \n \n HTEMS showed a higher potential for short-term reduction of pain than TENS and might offer new a therapeutic strategy for the treatment of chronic sciatica.\n","PeriodicalId":53614,"journal":{"name":"Open Pain Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Pain Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1876386301811010021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Chronic sciatica is a common pathology with a lifetime prevalence of 84%. Current therapy options are inadequate or not long-lasting. Evaluation of short-term application of High-Tone Electrical Muscle Stimulation (HTEMS) compared to Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) with chronic sciatica. Patients (n=100, (mean±SD) age=57±14 years, sex=42% male) with chronic sciatica were randomly assigned into two groups treated with either HTEMS or TENS. Each treatment was administered for a period of 45 min per day, 5 times within 7 days, with a 7-day wash-out period before crossover. A 5-day average of sciatic pain was assessed using the visual analog scale (VAS) before and after intervention. Drug administration was stable during the study. Before crossover, pain intensity was significantly reduced by the HTEMS treatment (56±21 (60 [50-70]) to 45±21 (50 [30-60]) mm VAS; p<0.001), while no improvement occurred with TENS (59±19 (60 [50-70]) to 56±19 (60 [45-79]) mm VAS). After crossover, significant pain reduction was observed in both groups (both p <0.01) and did not differ between both groups after the whole intervention. HTEMS showed a higher potential for short-term reduction of pain than TENS and might offer new a therapeutic strategy for the treatment of chronic sciatica.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高频外部肌肉刺激治疗慢性坐骨神经痛——一项随机对照交叉试验
慢性坐骨神经痛是一种常见的病理学,终生患病率为84%。目前的治疗选择不足或不持久。高频肌肉电刺激(HTEMS)与经皮神经电刺激(TENS)治疗慢性坐骨神经痛的短期应用评价。患有慢性坐骨神经痛的患者(n=100,(平均值±SD)年龄=57±14岁,性别=42%男性)被随机分为两组,接受HTEMS或TENS治疗。每种治疗每天给药45分钟,在7天内给药5次,交叉前给药7天。在干预前后使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估坐骨神经疼痛的5天平均值。研究期间给药情况稳定。交叉前,HTEMS治疗显著降低了疼痛强度(56±21(60[50-70])至45±21(50[30-60])mm VAS;p<0.001),而TENS(59±19(60[50-70])至56±19(60[45-79])mm VAS)没有改善。交叉后,两组的疼痛都显著减轻(均p<0.01),在整个干预后两组之间没有差异。HTEMS显示出比TENS更高的短期止痛潜力,并可能为治疗慢性坐骨神经痛提供新的治疗策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Open Pain Journal
Open Pain Journal Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
期刊最新文献
Occupational Stress Levels and Coping Strategies among Nurses Working in an Urban Metropolis in North Central Nigeria Sample Size Estimation for a Non-Inferiority Pain Management Trial Anesthetic Effects of Sevoflurane on the Mouse Somatosensory Cortex: A Flavoprotein Fluorescence Imaging Study Prevalence and Factors Associated with Acute Postoperative Pain after Emergency Abdominal Surgery Strength of excitation and insomnia as mediated by mood dimensions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1