Where lol Is: Function and Position of lol Used as a Discourse Marker in YouTube Comments

Célia Schneebeli
{"title":"Where lol Is: Function and Position of lol Used as a Discourse Marker in YouTube Comments","authors":"Célia Schneebeli","doi":"10.4000/DISCOURS.10900","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Lol is probably one of the most popular words in computer-mediated communication. It is generally taken to be the acronym of “laughing out loud”, but it is not always used to indicate a humorous response; rather, it is multifunctional. Drawing on previous studies of the different functions of lol, this paper explores a possible correlation between the position and function of non-lexicalized lol in the specific context of YouTube comments. The hypothesis is that the function of lol largely depends on its position: clause-initial lol is not used with the same functions as clause-final lol. The data for the study come from the comment threads of three popular YouTube videos posted in 2017, 2018 and 2019 on the channel Miranda Sings, a channel posting humorous videos, which has a very wide audience and 10 million subscribers. The complete comment threads total 20,287 comments and 886 distinct occurrences of non-lexicalized lol. The analysis of the occurrences is both quantitative, aimed at determining the proportions of each use and position, and qualitative. Using the tools of discourse analysis and pragmatics, the study examines the functions of lol on two levels: the level of discourse organization and the level of social interaction.","PeriodicalId":51977,"journal":{"name":"Discours-Revue de Linguistique Psycholinguistique et Informatique","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Discours-Revue de Linguistique Psycholinguistique et Informatique","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4000/DISCOURS.10900","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Lol is probably one of the most popular words in computer-mediated communication. It is generally taken to be the acronym of “laughing out loud”, but it is not always used to indicate a humorous response; rather, it is multifunctional. Drawing on previous studies of the different functions of lol, this paper explores a possible correlation between the position and function of non-lexicalized lol in the specific context of YouTube comments. The hypothesis is that the function of lol largely depends on its position: clause-initial lol is not used with the same functions as clause-final lol. The data for the study come from the comment threads of three popular YouTube videos posted in 2017, 2018 and 2019 on the channel Miranda Sings, a channel posting humorous videos, which has a very wide audience and 10 million subscribers. The complete comment threads total 20,287 comments and 886 distinct occurrences of non-lexicalized lol. The analysis of the occurrences is both quantitative, aimed at determining the proportions of each use and position, and qualitative. Using the tools of discourse analysis and pragmatics, the study examines the functions of lol on two levels: the level of discourse organization and the level of social interaction.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
lol在哪里:lol作为话语标记在YouTube评论中的作用和地位
Lol可能是计算机媒介交流中最流行的单词之一。它通常被认为是“laugh out loud”的缩写,但它并不总是用来表示幽默的回应;相反,它是多功能的。本文结合前人对lol不同功能的研究,探讨了非词汇化lol在YouTube评论特定语境中的位置和功能之间可能存在的关联。假设lol的功能在很大程度上取决于它的位置:子句开头的lol与子句结尾的lol的功能不同。该研究的数据来自2017年、2018年和2019年在YouTube上发布的三个热门视频的评论线,米兰达·辛格是一个发布幽默视频的频道,拥有非常广泛的受众和1000万订阅者。完整的评论线程共有20,287条评论和886个不同的非词汇化lol。对这些情况的分析既是定量的,目的是确定每种用法和位置的比例,也是定性的。本研究运用语篇分析和语用学的工具,从语篇组织和社会互动两个层面考察了lol的功能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Référence multimodale dans les narrations d’enfants : les gestes servent-ils à clarifier les expressions référentielles ambiguës ? Subject Clitics and the Dynamics of Writing: A Perspective Based on Bursts « Be proud, and loud » : marqueurs de fierté dans les discours oraux de drag queens Ancrage spatial d’un nouveau référent dans le récit en français et en chinois : perspective informationnelle et organisation discursive Anaphoric Distance in Oral and Written Language: Experimental Evidence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1