The archival colour line: race, records and post-colonial custody

IF 0.8 3区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Archives and Records-The Journal of the Archives and Records Association Pub Date : 2021-09-02 DOI:10.1080/23257962.2021.1940898
Riley Linebaugh, J. Lowry
{"title":"The archival colour line: race, records and post-colonial custody","authors":"Riley Linebaugh, J. Lowry","doi":"10.1080/23257962.2021.1940898","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Using the concept of the ‘colour line,’ by which W.E.B. Du Bois named the problematic ‘relation of the darker to the lighter races of men in Asia and Africa, in America and the islands of the sea,’ this article argues that the ongoing custody of archives displaced to Europe during decolonization constitutes an ‘archival colour line’ that both results from and recapitulates the racism of the imperial project. The article does this by first arguing that developments in post-custodialism return significance to custody, calling into question the value of ‘digital repatriation’ and ‘joint’ or ‘shared heritage.’ Establishing the importance of archival custody, the article then considers the racialized nature of archival displacements in postcolonial contexts, drawing on data from a recent international survey. To look more closely at how such an archival colour line might be constituted, the article examines the dispossession of people from Kericho, Kenya, to illuminate three stages of archival colour line formation; the colonial setting (provenance); decolonization and the reconfiguration of economic interests (appraisal); and postcolonial archives and the momentum of reckoning (custody). The article concludes that the ongoing European custody of the records in question results from and fortifies a global racist order.","PeriodicalId":42972,"journal":{"name":"Archives and Records-The Journal of the Archives and Records Association","volume":"42 1","pages":"284 - 303"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives and Records-The Journal of the Archives and Records Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23257962.2021.1940898","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

ABSTRACT Using the concept of the ‘colour line,’ by which W.E.B. Du Bois named the problematic ‘relation of the darker to the lighter races of men in Asia and Africa, in America and the islands of the sea,’ this article argues that the ongoing custody of archives displaced to Europe during decolonization constitutes an ‘archival colour line’ that both results from and recapitulates the racism of the imperial project. The article does this by first arguing that developments in post-custodialism return significance to custody, calling into question the value of ‘digital repatriation’ and ‘joint’ or ‘shared heritage.’ Establishing the importance of archival custody, the article then considers the racialized nature of archival displacements in postcolonial contexts, drawing on data from a recent international survey. To look more closely at how such an archival colour line might be constituted, the article examines the dispossession of people from Kericho, Kenya, to illuminate three stages of archival colour line formation; the colonial setting (provenance); decolonization and the reconfiguration of economic interests (appraisal); and postcolonial archives and the momentum of reckoning (custody). The article concludes that the ongoing European custody of the records in question results from and fortifies a global racist order.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
档案的颜色界线:种族、记录和后殖民时期的保管
摘要利用“颜色线”的概念,W.E.B.杜波依斯(W.E.B.Du Bois)用这一概念命名了亚洲和非洲、美洲和海岛上存在问题的“深色人种与浅色人种的关系”,这篇文章认为,在非殖民化期间,对迁移到欧洲的档案的持续保管构成了一条“档案颜色线”,这既是帝国项目种族主义的结果,也是对帝国项目种族歧视的概括。这篇文章首先认为,后监护主义的发展使监护权的意义回归,并对“数字遣返”和“共同”或“共享遗产”的价值提出了质疑根据最近一项国际调查的数据,文章确定了档案保管的重要性,然后考虑了后殖民背景下档案流离失所的种族化性质。为了更仔细地观察这种档案色彩线是如何构成的,本文考察了肯尼亚克里乔人被剥夺的情况,以阐明档案色彩线形成的三个阶段;殖民地背景(出处);非殖民化和经济利益重组(评估);以及后殖民时期的档案和清算(羁押)的势头。文章的结论是,欧洲对有关记录的持续保管是全球种族主义秩序的结果,并加强了这种秩序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
期刊最新文献
The Remaking of Archival Values The Remaking of Archival Values , by Victoria Hoyle, Oxford, Routledge, 2023, xv + 225pp., £120 (hardback) ISBN: 978-0-367-47867-4 Exhibiting the Archive: Space, Encounter, and Experience Defining ‘proper research’: privileged access, local authority archives and the academic researcher The Register of the Goldsmiths’ Company: Deeds and Documents, c. 1190 to c. 1666, 3 Volumes The handbook of archival practice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1