"Official" and "private" parks of the XVIII–XIX centuries through the prism of general landscape trends of the time

IF 0.1 0 ARCHITECTURE Landscape Architecture and Art Pub Date : 2022-11-10 DOI:10.22616/j.landarchart.2022.20.03
Y. Ivashko, A. Dmytrenko, M. Hryniewicz, Tetiana Petrunok, T. Yevdokimova
{"title":"\"Official\" and \"private\" parks of the XVIII–XIX centuries through the prism of general landscape trends of the time","authors":"Y. Ivashko, A. Dmytrenko, M. Hryniewicz, Tetiana Petrunok, T. Yevdokimova","doi":"10.22616/j.landarchart.2022.20.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article analyzes the basic principles of landscape design of the imperial and aristocratic parks in the Russian Empire in the XVIII–XIX centuries. There were \"official\" parks designed to be visited by high-ranking guests, and \"private\" parks, which were not covered by the canons of the \"official\" park. In the Tsarskoye Selo imperial residence Catherine's Park performed the function of \"official\" with the appropriate function of pomp, and located next to it Alexander's Park –respectively, the function of \"private\" imperial park. Catherine's Park became a model to follow one of the mostfamous parks in modern Ukraine –Oleksandriia Park in the city of Bila Tserkva. The common and different between Tsarskoye Selo park residence and aristocratic parks in Ukraine are analyzed, the principles of planning of these parks and the main constituent elements are compared. Based on this, the basic principles of planning parks of the Classicism and Empire style era in Ukraine and the \"iconic\" set of pavilions are determined. The general canons of the \"Ossian Park\" and their specific embodiment are analyzed on the example of Sofiivka Park in Uman. It was determined that the \"Ossian Park\" based on the canons is opposite to the parks of Classicism-Empire style.The methods of historical and culturological analysis, method of comparative analysis, method of field surveys used.","PeriodicalId":40393,"journal":{"name":"Landscape Architecture and Art","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Landscape Architecture and Art","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22616/j.landarchart.2022.20.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article analyzes the basic principles of landscape design of the imperial and aristocratic parks in the Russian Empire in the XVIII–XIX centuries. There were "official" parks designed to be visited by high-ranking guests, and "private" parks, which were not covered by the canons of the "official" park. In the Tsarskoye Selo imperial residence Catherine's Park performed the function of "official" with the appropriate function of pomp, and located next to it Alexander's Park –respectively, the function of "private" imperial park. Catherine's Park became a model to follow one of the mostfamous parks in modern Ukraine –Oleksandriia Park in the city of Bila Tserkva. The common and different between Tsarskoye Selo park residence and aristocratic parks in Ukraine are analyzed, the principles of planning of these parks and the main constituent elements are compared. Based on this, the basic principles of planning parks of the Classicism and Empire style era in Ukraine and the "iconic" set of pavilions are determined. The general canons of the "Ossian Park" and their specific embodiment are analyzed on the example of Sofiivka Park in Uman. It was determined that the "Ossian Park" based on the canons is opposite to the parks of Classicism-Empire style.The methods of historical and culturological analysis, method of comparative analysis, method of field surveys used.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
十八至十九世纪的“官方”和“私人”公园,从当时的总体景观趋势来看
本文分析了十八至十九世纪俄罗斯帝国皇家和贵族公园景观设计的基本原则。有专为高级客人设计的“官方”公园,也有不受“官方”公园规范管辖的“私人”公园。在沙皇塞洛皇宫中,叶卡捷琳娜公园发挥着“官方”的功能,并具有适当的盛典功能,而位于其旁边的亚历山大公园则分别具有“私人”皇家公园的功能。凯瑟琳公园成为了现代乌克兰最著名的公园之一——比拉察尔克瓦市的亚历山大公园的样板。分析了察斯科耶塞洛公园住宅与乌克兰贵族公园的异同,比较了这些公园的规划原则和主要构成要素。在此基础上,确定了乌克兰古典主义和帝国风格时代公园规划的基本原则和“标志性”的展馆设置。以人类索菲亚公园为例,分析了“奥西安公园”的一般规律及其具体体现。确定了以经典为基础的“奥西安公园”与古典主义帝国风格的公园相对立。采用了历史文化分析法、比较分析法、实地调查法等方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
25.00%
发文量
3
期刊介绍: Information not localized
期刊最新文献
Cardiogram of the Park: Quantitative Analysis of Walking Scenarios of Trakų Vokė Historic Park The importance of silhouette in the perception of the urban landscape. Saldus example Multicriteria assessment of landscape architecture projects: the sustainability perspective Public open space placemaking suitable for adolescents Malpils Manor: architecture, cultural and historical developments. Second half of the 18th century – first quarter of the 21st century
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1