Contemporary Challenges in Planning for Shrinkage of Historic Places: A Review

Q2 Arts and Humanities Architecture and Urban Planning Pub Date : 2018-12-01 DOI:10.2478/aup-2018-0018
S. Barvika, E. Bondars, Santa Bondare
{"title":"Contemporary Challenges in Planning for Shrinkage of Historic Places: A Review","authors":"S. Barvika, E. Bondars, Santa Bondare","doi":"10.2478/aup-2018-0018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Urban shrinkage is among of the most dangerous current risks for the preservation of liveability (e.g. residential function) in formerly prosperous historical residential and industrial districts. The planning for shrinkage emerged only in the 21st century in order to manage and prevent growing urban decay, depopulation and housing crisis through the application of smart structural adjustment policies and planning instruments for formerly heavily industrialised North American and Asian cities. Both shrinkage and liveability planning are still very “fuzzy” concepts and have been applied in ways that are not always consistent (e.g. for measuring decline, migration, demographics). However, remains the question of what (methods or approaches) would prevent (control) this well-known but evidently “wicked” and still less explored phenomenon of “loss of liveability” in a historical built environment. This paper aims to review the urban shrinkage and liveability problematic and prevention solutions (methods) based on studies of theory and practice of urban planning.","PeriodicalId":36267,"journal":{"name":"Architecture and Urban Planning","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Architecture and Urban Planning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/aup-2018-0018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Urban shrinkage is among of the most dangerous current risks for the preservation of liveability (e.g. residential function) in formerly prosperous historical residential and industrial districts. The planning for shrinkage emerged only in the 21st century in order to manage and prevent growing urban decay, depopulation and housing crisis through the application of smart structural adjustment policies and planning instruments for formerly heavily industrialised North American and Asian cities. Both shrinkage and liveability planning are still very “fuzzy” concepts and have been applied in ways that are not always consistent (e.g. for measuring decline, migration, demographics). However, remains the question of what (methods or approaches) would prevent (control) this well-known but evidently “wicked” and still less explored phenomenon of “loss of liveability” in a historical built environment. This paper aims to review the urban shrinkage and liveability problematic and prevention solutions (methods) based on studies of theory and practice of urban planning.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
历史遗迹缩减规划面临的当代挑战:综述
摘要在过去繁荣的历史住宅区和工业区,城市收缩是目前保护宜居性(如住宅功能)最危险的风险之一。收缩规划是在21世纪才出现的,目的是通过对以前工业化程度较高的北美和亚洲城市应用明智的结构调整政策和规划工具,来管理和防止日益严重的城市衰退、人口减少和住房危机。收缩和宜居性规划仍然是非常“模糊”的概念,其应用方式并不总是一致的(例如,用于衡量衰退、移民、人口统计)。然而,问题仍然是,在历史建筑环境中,什么(方法或途径)会阻止(控制)这种众所周知但显然“邪恶”且鲜为人知的“丧失宜居性”现象。本文旨在通过对城市规划理论和实践的研究,对城市收缩和宜居性问题及预防对策(方法)进行综述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Architecture and Urban Planning
Architecture and Urban Planning Arts and Humanities-Conservation
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
期刊最新文献
Shaping a Modern Townscape in The City Centre Area: The Case of Vilnius The Heritage Dimension of Industrial Landscape. Methodological Keys for Its Analysis and Identification Defining the Urban Greenspaces in the Indian Context Nancy Art Nouveau Architecture Distinctive Requirements and Recommendations for Housing Design During and after the Global Epidemic: A Case Analysis Based on User Experience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1