Opioid Prescription in Switzerland: Appropriate Comedication use in Cancer and Noncancer Pain.

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pain physician Pub Date : 2019-11-01 DOI:10.5167/UZH-179559
M. Wertli, U. Held, Andri Signorell, J. Steurer, E. Blozik, J. Burgstaller
{"title":"Opioid Prescription in Switzerland: Appropriate Comedication use in Cancer and Noncancer Pain.","authors":"M. Wertli, U. Held, Andri Signorell, J. Steurer, E. Blozik, J. Burgstaller","doi":"10.5167/UZH-179559","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nIn Europe, limited information on the use of opioids is available.\n\n\nOBJECTIVES\nTo assess how guideline recommendations to manage opioid-related adverse events were followed in cancer- and noncancer-related opioid use.\n\n\nSTUDY DESIGN\nAnalysis of health insurance data of one of the major health insurers in Switzerland.\n\n\nSETTING\nAll opioid claims between 2006 and 2014.\n\n\nMETHODS\nOpioid episodes were cancer-related when cancer treatments were used within ± 3 months of the first opioid claim. Recurrent strong episodes were defined as >/= 2 opioid claims with at least one strong opioid claim. Episode duration were acute (< 90 days), subacute, or chronic (>/= 120 days >/= 90 days +>/= 10 claims).\n\n\nRESULTS\nOut of 591,633 opioid episodes 76,968 (13%) were recurrent episodes: 94% were noncancer related (83% in recurrent episodes) and 6% cancer related (17% recurrent). Chronic opioid use was observed in 55% (noncancer) and 58% (cancer) recurrent episodes. Recommended laxatives were used in 50% noncancer and in 67% cancer episodes. Antiemetic drugs were used in 54% noncancer and in 83% cancer episodes. Not recommended coprescription of benzodiazepines was observed in 34% recurrent noncancer and 46% cancer episodes.\n\n\nLIMITATIONS\nNo clinical information was available to assess the indication for opioid use.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nIn this study, opioids were primarily used outside the context of cancer-related treatment. In noncancer-related opioid use, we found a substantial higher proportion without recommended laxative and antiemetic medications. Coprescription of benzodiazepines may increase the risk for opioid overdose and was present in one-third of the noncancer episodes and in almost every second cancer episode.\n\n\nKEY WORDS\nPain medications, opioids, nonopioids, benzodiazepines, health insurance claims data, cancer pain, noncancer pain, chronic opioid use, adverse events prevention, guideline recommendations.","PeriodicalId":19841,"journal":{"name":"Pain physician","volume":"22 6 1","pages":"537-548"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain physician","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5167/UZH-179559","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

BACKGROUND In Europe, limited information on the use of opioids is available. OBJECTIVES To assess how guideline recommendations to manage opioid-related adverse events were followed in cancer- and noncancer-related opioid use. STUDY DESIGN Analysis of health insurance data of one of the major health insurers in Switzerland. SETTING All opioid claims between 2006 and 2014. METHODS Opioid episodes were cancer-related when cancer treatments were used within ± 3 months of the first opioid claim. Recurrent strong episodes were defined as >/= 2 opioid claims with at least one strong opioid claim. Episode duration were acute (< 90 days), subacute, or chronic (>/= 120 days >/= 90 days +>/= 10 claims). RESULTS Out of 591,633 opioid episodes 76,968 (13%) were recurrent episodes: 94% were noncancer related (83% in recurrent episodes) and 6% cancer related (17% recurrent). Chronic opioid use was observed in 55% (noncancer) and 58% (cancer) recurrent episodes. Recommended laxatives were used in 50% noncancer and in 67% cancer episodes. Antiemetic drugs were used in 54% noncancer and in 83% cancer episodes. Not recommended coprescription of benzodiazepines was observed in 34% recurrent noncancer and 46% cancer episodes. LIMITATIONS No clinical information was available to assess the indication for opioid use. CONCLUSIONS In this study, opioids were primarily used outside the context of cancer-related treatment. In noncancer-related opioid use, we found a substantial higher proportion without recommended laxative and antiemetic medications. Coprescription of benzodiazepines may increase the risk for opioid overdose and was present in one-third of the noncancer episodes and in almost every second cancer episode. KEY WORDS Pain medications, opioids, nonopioids, benzodiazepines, health insurance claims data, cancer pain, noncancer pain, chronic opioid use, adverse events prevention, guideline recommendations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阿片类药物处方在瑞士:适当的药物使用在癌症和非癌症疼痛。
背景在欧洲,关于阿片类药物使用的信息有限。目的评估在癌症和非癌症相关阿片类药物使用中如何遵循指南建议来管理阿片类药物相关不良事件。研究设计:对瑞士一家主要医疗保险公司的医疗保险数据进行分析。2006年至2014年期间的所有阿片类药物索赔。方法在第一次阿片类药物申请后±3个月内使用癌症治疗时,类阿片发作与癌症相关。复发性强烈发作定义为>/= 2个阿片类药物索赔,至少有一个强烈的阿片类药物索赔。发作持续时间为急性(< 90天)、亚急性或慢性(>/= 120天,>/= 90天+>/= 10次)。结果在591,633例阿片类药物发作中,76,968例(13%)为复发发作:94%与癌症无关(复发发作83%),6%与癌症相关(复发17%)。慢性阿片类药物使用在55%(非癌症)和58%(癌症)复发发作中被观察到。50%的非癌症患者和67%的癌症患者使用了推荐的泻药。54%的非癌症患者和83%的癌症患者使用止吐药物。未推荐苯二氮卓类药物在34%的非癌症复发和46%的癌症发作中被观察到。局限性:没有临床资料可用于评估阿片类药物使用的指征。结论:在本研究中,阿片类药物主要用于癌症相关治疗之外。在非癌症相关的阿片类药物使用中,我们发现没有推荐泻药和止吐药物的比例要高得多。苯二氮卓类药物的共同处方可能会增加阿片类药物过量的风险,并且在三分之一的非癌症发作和几乎每二次癌症发作中都存在。关键词:西班牙药物,阿片类药物,非阿片类药物,苯二氮卓类药物,健康保险索赔数据,癌症疼痛,非癌症疼痛,慢性阿片类药物使用,不良事件预防,指南建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pain physician
Pain physician CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
21.60%
发文量
234
期刊介绍: Pain Physician Journal is the official publication of the American Society of Interventional Pain Physicians (ASIPP). The open access journal is published 6 times a year. Pain Physician Journal is a peer-reviewed, multi-disciplinary, open access journal written by and directed to an audience of interventional pain physicians, clinicians and basic scientists with an interest in interventional pain management and pain medicine. Pain Physician Journal presents the latest studies, research, and information vital to those in the emerging specialty of interventional pain management – and critical to the people they serve.
期刊最新文献
A Nomogram to Predict of Epidural Blood Patch Treatment Failure in Patients With Spontaneous Intracranial Hypotension and Subdural Hematoma. Effects of Continuous Intercostal Nerve Block Versus Patient-Controlled Intravenous Analgesia on Postoperative Pain After Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery. Real-World Insights into Dual Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide (CGRP) Therapies for Chronic Migraine: A Retrospective Review. Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Using 3D Printed Implants and a Lateral Approach: Safety and Effectiveness Assessments of Fusion Performed by Interventional Physicians in a Prospective Multicenter Single-Arm Clinical Study (The FICS Study). A Retrospective Study on the Therapeutic Effect of Low-Temperature Plasma Ablation for Postherpetic Neuralgia with Different Disease Durations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1