The effects of cycling using lower limb active passive trainers in people with neurological conditions: a systematic review

Alison Barclay, S. Gray, L. Paul, Scott Rooney
{"title":"The effects of cycling using lower limb active passive trainers in people with neurological conditions: a systematic review","authors":"Alison Barclay, S. Gray, L. Paul, Scott Rooney","doi":"10.12968/ijtr.2020.0171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Active passive trainers are frequently used as a safe, feasible way for people with neurological disabilities to exercise. However, evidence regarding their efficacy is limited. The aim of this study was to review the literature investigating the effects of lower limb active passive trainer cycling, with or without functional electrical stimulation, on spasticity, cardiovascular fitness, function and quality of life in people with neurological conditions Methods Five electronic databases were searched from inception to June 2021. Studies included: randomised controlled trials using lower limb active passive trainers as a cycling intervention; participants with neurological conditions, such as multiple sclerosis, spinal cord injury, stroke and Parkinson's disease; and at least one outcome related to spasticity, cardiovascular fitness, physical function or quality of life. Results A total of 12 articles were included (n=423 participants, 52% male). Of these, six used functional electrical stimulation-assisted active passive trainer interventions, and the remaining six used active passive trainer interventions alone. A meta-analysis demonstrated statistically significant improvement in walking endurance; however, this only included stroke studies (6-Minute Walk Test performance, P<0.00001). No statistically significant improvement in walking speed was found (P=0.31). A significant improvement in spasticity was reported by three studies (two using the active passive trainer intervention alone, one using the active passive trainer with functional electrical stimulation). One study reported improvement in quality of life. Few studies considered cardiovascular fitness. Conclusions The included studies featured heterogeneous designs, outcome measures, exercise prescriptions and participant disability levels, which made comparison difficult. Active passive trainer interventions appear to improve walking endurance in people with stroke; however, the effect on other outcomes and in other conditions remains unclear. It also remains uncertain as to whether functional electrical stimulation-assisted cycling is more beneficial than active passive trainer cycling alone.","PeriodicalId":46562,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12968/ijtr.2020.0171","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Active passive trainers are frequently used as a safe, feasible way for people with neurological disabilities to exercise. However, evidence regarding their efficacy is limited. The aim of this study was to review the literature investigating the effects of lower limb active passive trainer cycling, with or without functional electrical stimulation, on spasticity, cardiovascular fitness, function and quality of life in people with neurological conditions Methods Five electronic databases were searched from inception to June 2021. Studies included: randomised controlled trials using lower limb active passive trainers as a cycling intervention; participants with neurological conditions, such as multiple sclerosis, spinal cord injury, stroke and Parkinson's disease; and at least one outcome related to spasticity, cardiovascular fitness, physical function or quality of life. Results A total of 12 articles were included (n=423 participants, 52% male). Of these, six used functional electrical stimulation-assisted active passive trainer interventions, and the remaining six used active passive trainer interventions alone. A meta-analysis demonstrated statistically significant improvement in walking endurance; however, this only included stroke studies (6-Minute Walk Test performance, P<0.00001). No statistically significant improvement in walking speed was found (P=0.31). A significant improvement in spasticity was reported by three studies (two using the active passive trainer intervention alone, one using the active passive trainer with functional electrical stimulation). One study reported improvement in quality of life. Few studies considered cardiovascular fitness. Conclusions The included studies featured heterogeneous designs, outcome measures, exercise prescriptions and participant disability levels, which made comparison difficult. Active passive trainer interventions appear to improve walking endurance in people with stroke; however, the effect on other outcomes and in other conditions remains unclear. It also remains uncertain as to whether functional electrical stimulation-assisted cycling is more beneficial than active passive trainer cycling alone.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用下肢主动-被动训练器骑自行车对神经系统疾病患者的影响:一项系统综述
背景主动-被动训练器是神经系统残疾患者经常使用的一种安全、可行的锻炼方式。然而,有关其疗效的证据有限。本研究的目的是回顾研究有或没有功能性电刺激的下肢主动-被动教练自行车运动对神经系统疾病患者痉挛、心血管健康、功能和生活质量影响的文献。方法从开始到2021年6月,检索了五个电子数据库。研究包括:使用下肢主动-被动训练器作为自行车干预的随机对照试验;患有神经系统疾病的参与者,如多发性硬化症、脊髓损伤、中风和帕金森病;以及至少一种与痉挛、心血管健康、身体功能或生活质量有关的结果。结果共纳入12篇文章(423名参与者,52%为男性)。其中,6人使用功能性电刺激辅助主动-被动教练干预,其余6人仅使用主动-被动培训师干预。一项荟萃分析显示,步行耐力在统计学上有显著改善;然而,这只包括中风研究(6分钟步行测试表现,P<0.00001)。没有发现步行速度有统计学上的显著改善(P=0.31)。三项研究报告痉挛有显著改善(两项单独使用主动-被动训练器干预,一项使用带功能性电刺激的主动-被动教练)。一项研究报告了生活质量的改善。很少有研究考虑心血管健康。结论纳入的研究具有异质性设计、结果测量、运动处方和参与者残疾水平,这使得比较变得困难。主动-被动教练干预似乎可以提高中风患者的行走耐力;然而,对其他结果和其他情况的影响尚不清楚。功能性电刺激辅助骑行是否比主动-被动教练单独骑行更有益,目前仍不确定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
40.00%
发文量
56
期刊介绍: International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation (IJTR) publishes original research, providing a platform for the latest key research findings in therapy and rehabilitation. Review and analysis articles are invited internationally to enable the sharing of practices and developments worldwide, and to raise awareness of different cultural influences in health care. IJTR provides an interdisciplinary approach to therapy and rehabilitation by: -Providing a well-referenced source of information to all professionals involved in therapy and rehabilitation worldwide, including occupational therapists, physiotherapists, chiropodists and podiatrists, radiographers, speech and language therapists and orthoptists -Providing a peer-reviewed source of original research and information presented in an accessible, informative and professional medium -Providing a forum for the discussion of new ideas, information and issues relating to therapy and rehabilitation -Creating an awareness of the national and international issues affecting professionals involved in therapy and rehabilitation -Encouraging collaboration and sharing of new ideas between professions worldwide
期刊最新文献
The relationships between upper extremity muscle strength and endurance with respiratory function, functional capacity and quality of life in children and adolescents with cystic fibrosis Predicting outcomes, describing complications and optimising rehabilitation in patients undergoing lung transplantation Integrating the wrist-worn tracker in cardiac rehabilitation programmes: a scoping review Amplitude training in occupational therapy for the treatment of Parkinson's disease: a feasibility study Comparing the reliability of the Goniometer Pro application and flexicurve for measuring thoracic kyphosis: a cross-sectional study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1