In my professor’s eyes: Faculty and perceived impoliteness in student emails

Q2 Arts and Humanities Lodz Papers in Pragmatics Pub Date : 2022-05-01 DOI:10.1515/lpp-2022-0009
I. Haider, H. Zandi
{"title":"In my professor’s eyes: Faculty and perceived impoliteness in student emails","authors":"I. Haider, H. Zandi","doi":"10.1515/lpp-2022-0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Impoliteness in student emails to faculty can have negative consequences. However, the nuances of perceived impoliteness by faculty with different language backgrounds have not been thoroughly studied in the literature. This paper explores how emails written by non-native English-speaking students are perceived impolite by faculty depending on social identity variables such as native speaker status, gender, and seniority. Participants (n = 152 faculty) read six emails and rated their perceptions of the emails on a questionnaire. The items on the questionnaire were about lack of face enhancement, use of face threat, acknowledgment of imposition, and not giving a choice in complying with requests. Results suggest that in their perceptions of the lack of face enhancement, senior faculty seemed to be more tolerant than their junior counterparts. Further, non-native speakers of English were found to be more tolerant of the lack of acknowledgment of imposition. However, no significant association was observed between the social identity of the faculty and their perception of face threat nor between social identity and giving a choice in complying with requests. The paper has implications for raising the awareness of the faculty and students about their potential biases in academic correspondence.","PeriodicalId":39423,"journal":{"name":"Lodz Papers in Pragmatics","volume":"18 1","pages":"197 - 222"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lodz Papers in Pragmatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/lpp-2022-0009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Impoliteness in student emails to faculty can have negative consequences. However, the nuances of perceived impoliteness by faculty with different language backgrounds have not been thoroughly studied in the literature. This paper explores how emails written by non-native English-speaking students are perceived impolite by faculty depending on social identity variables such as native speaker status, gender, and seniority. Participants (n = 152 faculty) read six emails and rated their perceptions of the emails on a questionnaire. The items on the questionnaire were about lack of face enhancement, use of face threat, acknowledgment of imposition, and not giving a choice in complying with requests. Results suggest that in their perceptions of the lack of face enhancement, senior faculty seemed to be more tolerant than their junior counterparts. Further, non-native speakers of English were found to be more tolerant of the lack of acknowledgment of imposition. However, no significant association was observed between the social identity of the faculty and their perception of face threat nor between social identity and giving a choice in complying with requests. The paper has implications for raising the awareness of the faculty and students about their potential biases in academic correspondence.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在我的教授眼中:教师和学生电子邮件中的不礼貌行为
学生给老师发邮件时的不礼貌行为可能会产生负面影响。然而,不同语言背景的教师对不礼貌行为感知的细微差别在文献中尚未得到深入研究。本文探讨了非英语母语学生写的电子邮件是如何被教师认为不礼貌的,这取决于社会身份变量,如母语者的地位、性别和资历。参与者(152名教师)阅读了六封电子邮件,并在问卷上对他们对电子邮件的看法进行了评分。问卷上的项目是缺乏面部增强,使用面部威胁,承认强迫,以及没有选择是否遵守要求。结果表明,在他们对缺乏面部增强的看法上,高级教师似乎比初级教师更宽容。此外,非英语母语者被发现更能容忍不承认强加。然而,在教师的社会认同和他们对面孔威胁的感知之间,以及在社会认同和是否服从要求之间,没有观察到显著的联系。本文对提高教师和学生对学术通信中潜在偏见的认识具有启示意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Lodz Papers in Pragmatics
Lodz Papers in Pragmatics Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Writer and participant visibility in quantitative and qualitative research: a corpus-assisted study of human agent verbs in health science publications The most common graphicons in Mexican Spanish speaking WhatsApp communities composed of school parents Ecological discourse analysis and meaning interpretation of BBC news reports on 2019 Australian bushfires from the perspective of transitivity system A multimodal contrastive analysis of regulations and instructions during the COVID-19 lockdown in the context of the Island of Madeira and the United Kingdom Apology strategies in Tashelhit: linguistic realization and religious influence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1