Classroom Controversy in the Midst of Political Polarization: The Essential Role of School Administrators

Q3 Social Sciences NASSP Bulletin Pub Date : 2022-05-11 DOI:10.1177/01926365221100589
Wayne Journell
{"title":"Classroom Controversy in the Midst of Political Polarization: The Essential Role of School Administrators","authors":"Wayne Journell","doi":"10.1177/01926365221100589","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It has been well established that controversial issue discussions are an integral component to a high-quality civic education. However, as the United States has become increasingly politically polarized, teachers have become more hesitant to engage students in discussions of controversial political issues. Two decades worth of literature on teaching controversial issues has shown that a primary factor in determining whether teachers will engage students in controversial issue discussions is whether they feel supported by their school administrators. Yet, school leaders have rarely been the focus of civic education efforts. This article seeks to bridge that divide by first providing a review of the research showing the importance of engaging with controversy in K-12 education and the influence of school leadership on that process and then ending with implications for school administrators who wish to support teachers who broach controversy in their classrooms.","PeriodicalId":39340,"journal":{"name":"NASSP Bulletin","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NASSP Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01926365221100589","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

It has been well established that controversial issue discussions are an integral component to a high-quality civic education. However, as the United States has become increasingly politically polarized, teachers have become more hesitant to engage students in discussions of controversial political issues. Two decades worth of literature on teaching controversial issues has shown that a primary factor in determining whether teachers will engage students in controversial issue discussions is whether they feel supported by their school administrators. Yet, school leaders have rarely been the focus of civic education efforts. This article seeks to bridge that divide by first providing a review of the research showing the importance of engaging with controversy in K-12 education and the influence of school leadership on that process and then ending with implications for school administrators who wish to support teachers who broach controversy in their classrooms.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
政治两极分化中的课堂争议:学校管理者的本质角色
众所周知,有争议的问题讨论是高质量公民教育不可或缺的组成部分。然而,随着美国政治两极分化的加剧,教师们对让学生参与有争议的政治问题的讨论变得更加犹豫。20年来关于教授有争议问题的文献表明,决定教师是否会让学生参与有争议的问题讨论的一个主要因素是他们是否感到得到了学校管理人员的支持。然而,学校领导很少成为公民教育工作的焦点。这篇文章试图弥合这一分歧,首先对研究进行回顾,表明在K-12教育中参与争议的重要性以及学校领导层对这一过程的影响,然后对希望支持在课堂上提出争议的教师的学校管理人员提出意见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
NASSP Bulletin
NASSP Bulletin Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊最新文献
Principal and Assistant Principal Involvement in and Barriers to Supporting Secondary Transition for Students with Disabilities Leveraging Co-Teaching as a Social Justice Pedagogy: What School Leaders Need to Know Faculty and Administrator Attitudes Toward Internet-Based Technologies and Virtual Networking Leading to the Development and Support of Social Capital In this Issue… How Principals’ Knowledge and Experiences Inform Their Use of Restorative in Lieu of Exclusionary Practices
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1