{"title":"A primer on measurement invariance in L2 anxiety research","authors":"Ekaterina Sudina","doi":"10.1017/S0267190523000089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Measurement invariance (MI) is essential to bolstering validity arguments behind psychometric instruments (Zumbo, 2007). Nonetheless, very few second language (L2) anxiety scales, including the most widely used L2 anxiety questionnaire—the Foreign Language Classroom Anxiety Scale (FLCAS; Horwitz et al., 1986)—have been tested for MI. The present paper seeks to address this deficiency in the literature (a) by demonstrating why this procedure is key to enhancing our understanding of the latent phenomenon in question, particularly in relation to different language learning contexts, (b) by outlining the main stages of MI testing with specific recommendations for L2 scale developers and users, (c) by providing commendable examples of the application of MI in applied linguistics research in order to illustrate the potential of this technique, and (d) by making a case for employing MI in future validation studies, thereby promoting methodologically sound research practices in the context of anxiety scales and elsewhere in applied linguistics.","PeriodicalId":47490,"journal":{"name":"Annual Review of Applied Linguistics","volume":"43 1","pages":"140 - 146"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annual Review of Applied Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190523000089","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abstract Measurement invariance (MI) is essential to bolstering validity arguments behind psychometric instruments (Zumbo, 2007). Nonetheless, very few second language (L2) anxiety scales, including the most widely used L2 anxiety questionnaire—the Foreign Language Classroom Anxiety Scale (FLCAS; Horwitz et al., 1986)—have been tested for MI. The present paper seeks to address this deficiency in the literature (a) by demonstrating why this procedure is key to enhancing our understanding of the latent phenomenon in question, particularly in relation to different language learning contexts, (b) by outlining the main stages of MI testing with specific recommendations for L2 scale developers and users, (c) by providing commendable examples of the application of MI in applied linguistics research in order to illustrate the potential of this technique, and (d) by making a case for employing MI in future validation studies, thereby promoting methodologically sound research practices in the context of anxiety scales and elsewhere in applied linguistics.
测量不变性(MI)对于支持心理测量工具的有效性论证至关重要(Zumbo, 2007)。然而,很少有第二语言焦虑量表,包括最广泛使用的第二语言焦虑问卷-外语课堂焦虑量表(FLCAS;Horwitz et al., 1986)已经对MI进行了测试。本文试图解决文献中的这一缺陷(a)通过证明为什么这一过程是增强我们对所讨论的潜在现象的理解的关键,特别是在不同的语言学习背景下,(b)通过概述MI测试的主要阶段,并为第二语言量表开发者和用户提供具体建议,(c)通过提供MI在应用语言学研究中应用的值得称赞的例子,以说明该技术的潜力;(d)通过在未来的验证研究中使用MI的案例,从而在焦虑量表和其他应用语言学的背景下促进方法学上合理的研究实践。
期刊介绍:
The Annual Review of Applied Linguistics publishes research on key topics in the broad field of applied linguistics. Each issue is thematic, providing a variety of perspectives on the topic through research summaries, critical overviews, position papers and empirical studies. Being responsive to the field, some issues are tied to the theme of that year''s annual conference of the American Association for Applied Linguistics. Also, at regular intervals an issue will take the approach of covering applied linguistics as a field more broadly, including coverage of critical or controversial topics. ARAL provides cutting-edge and timely articles on a wide number of areas, including language learning and pedagogy, second language acquisition, sociolinguistics, language policy and planning, language assessment, and research design and methodology, to name just a few.