Clinical effect of right subaxillary small incision approach on children with congenital heart disease

Penggao Wang, Yu Zhang, Zhongjian Chen, Yazhou Cui, Wenbo Yu, Xiangyang Dong
{"title":"Clinical effect of right subaxillary small incision approach on children with congenital heart disease","authors":"Penggao Wang, Yu Zhang, Zhongjian Chen, Yazhou Cui, Wenbo Yu, Xiangyang Dong","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.2095-428X.2020.01.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo analyze the clinical effect of right subaxillary small incision approach on children with congenital heart disease (CHD). \n \n \nMethods \nEighty-six patients with CHD admitted to Henan Children′s Hospital from January 2015 to September 2017 were enrolled in this study.The patients were randomly divided into the control group and the observation group with 43 cases each group.The control group underwent sternal median incision, and the observation group underwent right subaxillary small incision.The total effective rate, incision satisfaction, general conditions of surgery (cardiopulmonary bypass time, operation time, aortic occlusion time, intraoperative blood loss), postoperative related conditions (thoracic drainage volume, postoperative monitoring time, postoperative assisted ventilation time, hospitalization time, hospitalization expenses), Wong-Baker facial expression scale (FPS-R) score, as well as the respiratory function index including the levels of peak inspiratory pressure (PIP) and alveolar-arterial oxygen pressure difference [p(A-a) (O2)]after anesthesia (T1), after operation (T2), at admission to intensive care unit (T3) and before extubation (T4) and complication rate between 2 groups were compared. \n \n \nResults \n(1)The incision satisfaction in the observation group [90.70% (39/43 cases)] was higher than that in the control group [62.79% (27/43 cases)], and the difference was statistically significant (χ2=9.382, P=0.002). (2)There was no significant difference in the the extracorporeal circulation time, operation time and aortic block time between the two groups [observation group: (68.94±8.26) min, (2.33±0.21) h, (28.79±7.32) min; control group: (67.11±9.11) min, (2.25±0.31) h, (30.02±6.88) min] (P>0.05). (3)The intraoperative blood loss [(89.87±11.25) mL] in the observation group was less than that in the control group [(105.91±31.01) mL], which difference was statistically significant (t=3.189, P=0.002). (4)Also there was significant difference in postoperative monitoring time, postoperative assisted ventilation time, hospitalization time, thoracic drainage volume and hospitalization expenses between the two groups (the observation group: postoperative monitoring time (30.55±10.39) h, postoperative assisted ventilation time [(9.68±2.19) h, hospitalization time (9.61±2.17) d, thoracic drainage volume (90.36±26.14) mL, hospitalization expenses (36 956.15±1 097.84) yuan; the control group: (41.39±9.93) h, (12.72±3.81) h, (12.33±3.15) d, (163.24±29.36) mL and (45 271.97±1 134.55) yuan] (t=4.946, 4.536, 4.663, 12.157, 34.540, all P 0.05). There was no significant difference in the complication rate between the observation group [6.98% (3/43 cases)] and the control group [4.65% (2/43 cases)] (χ2=0.000, P>0.05). \n \n \nConclusions \nRight subaxillary small incision approach does not affect the respiratory function of children with CHD, which can improve the satisfaction of incision, reduce the amount of blood loss, accelerate postoperative recovery of children, relieve postoperative pain, and reduce the financial burden of parents.Besides, intra-operative proficient and accurate operations can reduce or avoid the occurrence of related complications and ensure the safety of surgery. \n \n \nKey words: \nMinimally invasive; Sternal median incision; Congenital heart disease; Small incision in right axillary; Child; Open surgery","PeriodicalId":9843,"journal":{"name":"中华实用儿科临床杂志","volume":"35 1","pages":"41-45"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华实用儿科临床杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.2095-428X.2020.01.011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective To analyze the clinical effect of right subaxillary small incision approach on children with congenital heart disease (CHD). Methods Eighty-six patients with CHD admitted to Henan Children′s Hospital from January 2015 to September 2017 were enrolled in this study.The patients were randomly divided into the control group and the observation group with 43 cases each group.The control group underwent sternal median incision, and the observation group underwent right subaxillary small incision.The total effective rate, incision satisfaction, general conditions of surgery (cardiopulmonary bypass time, operation time, aortic occlusion time, intraoperative blood loss), postoperative related conditions (thoracic drainage volume, postoperative monitoring time, postoperative assisted ventilation time, hospitalization time, hospitalization expenses), Wong-Baker facial expression scale (FPS-R) score, as well as the respiratory function index including the levels of peak inspiratory pressure (PIP) and alveolar-arterial oxygen pressure difference [p(A-a) (O2)]after anesthesia (T1), after operation (T2), at admission to intensive care unit (T3) and before extubation (T4) and complication rate between 2 groups were compared. Results (1)The incision satisfaction in the observation group [90.70% (39/43 cases)] was higher than that in the control group [62.79% (27/43 cases)], and the difference was statistically significant (χ2=9.382, P=0.002). (2)There was no significant difference in the the extracorporeal circulation time, operation time and aortic block time between the two groups [observation group: (68.94±8.26) min, (2.33±0.21) h, (28.79±7.32) min; control group: (67.11±9.11) min, (2.25±0.31) h, (30.02±6.88) min] (P>0.05). (3)The intraoperative blood loss [(89.87±11.25) mL] in the observation group was less than that in the control group [(105.91±31.01) mL], which difference was statistically significant (t=3.189, P=0.002). (4)Also there was significant difference in postoperative monitoring time, postoperative assisted ventilation time, hospitalization time, thoracic drainage volume and hospitalization expenses between the two groups (the observation group: postoperative monitoring time (30.55±10.39) h, postoperative assisted ventilation time [(9.68±2.19) h, hospitalization time (9.61±2.17) d, thoracic drainage volume (90.36±26.14) mL, hospitalization expenses (36 956.15±1 097.84) yuan; the control group: (41.39±9.93) h, (12.72±3.81) h, (12.33±3.15) d, (163.24±29.36) mL and (45 271.97±1 134.55) yuan] (t=4.946, 4.536, 4.663, 12.157, 34.540, all P 0.05). There was no significant difference in the complication rate between the observation group [6.98% (3/43 cases)] and the control group [4.65% (2/43 cases)] (χ2=0.000, P>0.05). Conclusions Right subaxillary small incision approach does not affect the respiratory function of children with CHD, which can improve the satisfaction of incision, reduce the amount of blood loss, accelerate postoperative recovery of children, relieve postoperative pain, and reduce the financial burden of parents.Besides, intra-operative proficient and accurate operations can reduce or avoid the occurrence of related complications and ensure the safety of surgery. Key words: Minimally invasive; Sternal median incision; Congenital heart disease; Small incision in right axillary; Child; Open surgery
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
右腋下小切口入路治疗儿童先天性心脏病的临床疗效
目的分析右腋下小切口入路治疗儿童先天性心脏病的临床疗效。方法对河南省儿童医院2015年1月至2017年9月收治的86例冠心病患者进行研究。将患者随机分为对照组和观察组,每组43例。对照组采用胸骨正中切口,观察组采用右腋下小切口。总有效率、切口满意度、手术一般情况(体外循环时间、手术时间、主动脉闭塞时间、术中失血量)、术后相关情况(胸腔引流量、术后监护时间、术后辅助通气时间、住院时间、住院费用),比较麻醉后(T1)、手术后(T2)、进入重症监护室(T3)和拔管前(T4)的Wong-Baker面部表情量表(FPS-R)评分、呼吸功能指数(包括峰值吸气压(PIP)和肺泡动脉氧压差[p(A-A)(O2)])和并发症发生率。结果(1)观察组切口满意度【90.70%(39/43例)】明显高于对照组【62.79%(27/43)】,差异有统计学意义(χ2=9.382,P=0.002),两组手术时间和主动脉阻断时间[观察组:(68.94±8.26)min,(2.33±0.21)h,(28.79±7.32)min;对照组:(67.11±9.11)min,差异有统计学意义(t=3.189,P=0.002)。(4)两组在术后监护时间、术后辅助通气时间、住院时间、胸腔引流量、住院费用等方面也有显著性差异(观察组:术后监测时间(30.55±10.39)h,术后辅助通气时间[(9.68±2.19)h,住院时间(9.61±2.17)d,胸腔引流量(90.36±26.14)mL,住院费用(36956.15±1097.84)元;对照组:(41.39±9.93)h,(12.72±3.81)h,[12.33±3.15)d,(163.24±29.36)mL,[45.271.97±134.55)元](t=4.946,4.536,4.663,12.157,34.540,均P 0.05)观察组并发症发生率[6.98%(3/43例)]与对照组[4.65%(2/43例)差异有统计学意义(χ2=0.000,P>0.05),减轻术后疼痛,减轻父母的经济负担。此外,术中熟练准确的操作可以减少或避免相关并发症的发生,确保手术安全。关键词:微创;胸骨正中切口;先天性心脏病;右腋下小切口;儿童;开放手术
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
中华实用儿科临床杂志
中华实用儿科临床杂志 Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14243
期刊介绍: Chinese Journal of Applied Clinical Pediatrics ( semi-monthly ) is a core journal of paediatrics under the supervision of China Association for Science and Technology, sponsored by Chinese Medical Association and undertaken by Xinxiang Medical College. Founded in 1986, it is openly circulated both at home and abroad. The journal has several columns, such as Expert Forum, Experimental Research and Paediatric Surgery, which are mainly for paediatric medical workers and medical researchers in hospitals. Its purpose is to reflect the new theories and technologies in paediatric medicine and scientific research at home and abroad, and to promote academic exchanges. Chinese Journal of Applied Clinical Pediatrics is a source journal of China Science Citation Database (CSCD), a core journal of Peking University, a source journal of Chinese science and technology paper statistics (China Science and Technology Core Journals), a core academic journal of RCCSE, a high-quality scientific and technical journal of China, a high-quality scientific and technical journal of China Association for Science and Technology, and a high-quality scientific and technical journal of China Biomedical Science and Technology Association. We have been published in China Biomedical Literature Database (SinoMed), China Knowledge Network, Wanfang Data Knowledge Service Platform, China Academic Journal Abstracts, Scopus Database, Chemical Abstracts (USA), Japan Science and Technology Agency (JSTA) Database, Copernicus Abstracts (Poland), Abstracts of the Centre for Agricultural and Biological Sciences (CABS) of the United Kingdom, Cambridge Scientific Abstracts ProQuest Database, WHO Medical Journal of the Western Pacific Region (WMPR), and WHO Medical Journal of the Western Pacific Region (WMPR) of the United States. We have been included in dozens of authoritative databases at home and abroad, such as WHO Western Pacific Region Index of Medicine (WPRIM), Ullrich's Guide to Periodicals, and so on.
期刊最新文献
Experts' consensus on severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 vaccination of children Twenty key issues on severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 vaccination in children Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children related with 2019 Novel Coronavirus infection Special issues in diagnosis of Kawasaki disease Advances in research on Escherichia coli and pediatric infectious diseases
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1