{"title":"Clinical effect of right subaxillary small incision approach on children with congenital heart disease","authors":"Penggao Wang, Yu Zhang, Zhongjian Chen, Yazhou Cui, Wenbo Yu, Xiangyang Dong","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.2095-428X.2020.01.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo analyze the clinical effect of right subaxillary small incision approach on children with congenital heart disease (CHD). \n \n \nMethods \nEighty-six patients with CHD admitted to Henan Children′s Hospital from January 2015 to September 2017 were enrolled in this study.The patients were randomly divided into the control group and the observation group with 43 cases each group.The control group underwent sternal median incision, and the observation group underwent right subaxillary small incision.The total effective rate, incision satisfaction, general conditions of surgery (cardiopulmonary bypass time, operation time, aortic occlusion time, intraoperative blood loss), postoperative related conditions (thoracic drainage volume, postoperative monitoring time, postoperative assisted ventilation time, hospitalization time, hospitalization expenses), Wong-Baker facial expression scale (FPS-R) score, as well as the respiratory function index including the levels of peak inspiratory pressure (PIP) and alveolar-arterial oxygen pressure difference [p(A-a) (O2)]after anesthesia (T1), after operation (T2), at admission to intensive care unit (T3) and before extubation (T4) and complication rate between 2 groups were compared. \n \n \nResults \n(1)The incision satisfaction in the observation group [90.70% (39/43 cases)] was higher than that in the control group [62.79% (27/43 cases)], and the difference was statistically significant (χ2=9.382, P=0.002). (2)There was no significant difference in the the extracorporeal circulation time, operation time and aortic block time between the two groups [observation group: (68.94±8.26) min, (2.33±0.21) h, (28.79±7.32) min; control group: (67.11±9.11) min, (2.25±0.31) h, (30.02±6.88) min] (P>0.05). (3)The intraoperative blood loss [(89.87±11.25) mL] in the observation group was less than that in the control group [(105.91±31.01) mL], which difference was statistically significant (t=3.189, P=0.002). (4)Also there was significant difference in postoperative monitoring time, postoperative assisted ventilation time, hospitalization time, thoracic drainage volume and hospitalization expenses between the two groups (the observation group: postoperative monitoring time (30.55±10.39) h, postoperative assisted ventilation time [(9.68±2.19) h, hospitalization time (9.61±2.17) d, thoracic drainage volume (90.36±26.14) mL, hospitalization expenses (36 956.15±1 097.84) yuan; the control group: (41.39±9.93) h, (12.72±3.81) h, (12.33±3.15) d, (163.24±29.36) mL and (45 271.97±1 134.55) yuan] (t=4.946, 4.536, 4.663, 12.157, 34.540, all P 0.05). There was no significant difference in the complication rate between the observation group [6.98% (3/43 cases)] and the control group [4.65% (2/43 cases)] (χ2=0.000, P>0.05). \n \n \nConclusions \nRight subaxillary small incision approach does not affect the respiratory function of children with CHD, which can improve the satisfaction of incision, reduce the amount of blood loss, accelerate postoperative recovery of children, relieve postoperative pain, and reduce the financial burden of parents.Besides, intra-operative proficient and accurate operations can reduce or avoid the occurrence of related complications and ensure the safety of surgery. \n \n \nKey words: \nMinimally invasive; Sternal median incision; Congenital heart disease; Small incision in right axillary; Child; Open surgery","PeriodicalId":9843,"journal":{"name":"中华实用儿科临床杂志","volume":"35 1","pages":"41-45"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华实用儿科临床杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.2095-428X.2020.01.011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
To analyze the clinical effect of right subaxillary small incision approach on children with congenital heart disease (CHD).
Methods
Eighty-six patients with CHD admitted to Henan Children′s Hospital from January 2015 to September 2017 were enrolled in this study.The patients were randomly divided into the control group and the observation group with 43 cases each group.The control group underwent sternal median incision, and the observation group underwent right subaxillary small incision.The total effective rate, incision satisfaction, general conditions of surgery (cardiopulmonary bypass time, operation time, aortic occlusion time, intraoperative blood loss), postoperative related conditions (thoracic drainage volume, postoperative monitoring time, postoperative assisted ventilation time, hospitalization time, hospitalization expenses), Wong-Baker facial expression scale (FPS-R) score, as well as the respiratory function index including the levels of peak inspiratory pressure (PIP) and alveolar-arterial oxygen pressure difference [p(A-a) (O2)]after anesthesia (T1), after operation (T2), at admission to intensive care unit (T3) and before extubation (T4) and complication rate between 2 groups were compared.
Results
(1)The incision satisfaction in the observation group [90.70% (39/43 cases)] was higher than that in the control group [62.79% (27/43 cases)], and the difference was statistically significant (χ2=9.382, P=0.002). (2)There was no significant difference in the the extracorporeal circulation time, operation time and aortic block time between the two groups [observation group: (68.94±8.26) min, (2.33±0.21) h, (28.79±7.32) min; control group: (67.11±9.11) min, (2.25±0.31) h, (30.02±6.88) min] (P>0.05). (3)The intraoperative blood loss [(89.87±11.25) mL] in the observation group was less than that in the control group [(105.91±31.01) mL], which difference was statistically significant (t=3.189, P=0.002). (4)Also there was significant difference in postoperative monitoring time, postoperative assisted ventilation time, hospitalization time, thoracic drainage volume and hospitalization expenses between the two groups (the observation group: postoperative monitoring time (30.55±10.39) h, postoperative assisted ventilation time [(9.68±2.19) h, hospitalization time (9.61±2.17) d, thoracic drainage volume (90.36±26.14) mL, hospitalization expenses (36 956.15±1 097.84) yuan; the control group: (41.39±9.93) h, (12.72±3.81) h, (12.33±3.15) d, (163.24±29.36) mL and (45 271.97±1 134.55) yuan] (t=4.946, 4.536, 4.663, 12.157, 34.540, all P 0.05). There was no significant difference in the complication rate between the observation group [6.98% (3/43 cases)] and the control group [4.65% (2/43 cases)] (χ2=0.000, P>0.05).
Conclusions
Right subaxillary small incision approach does not affect the respiratory function of children with CHD, which can improve the satisfaction of incision, reduce the amount of blood loss, accelerate postoperative recovery of children, relieve postoperative pain, and reduce the financial burden of parents.Besides, intra-operative proficient and accurate operations can reduce or avoid the occurrence of related complications and ensure the safety of surgery.
Key words:
Minimally invasive; Sternal median incision; Congenital heart disease; Small incision in right axillary; Child; Open surgery
中华实用儿科临床杂志Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14243
期刊介绍:
Chinese Journal of Applied Clinical Pediatrics ( semi-monthly ) is a core journal of paediatrics under the supervision of China Association for Science and Technology, sponsored by Chinese Medical Association and undertaken by Xinxiang Medical College. Founded in 1986, it is openly circulated both at home and abroad. The journal has several columns, such as Expert Forum, Experimental Research and Paediatric Surgery, which are mainly for paediatric medical workers and medical researchers in hospitals. Its purpose is to reflect the new theories and technologies in paediatric medicine and scientific research at home and abroad, and to promote academic exchanges.
Chinese Journal of Applied Clinical Pediatrics is a source journal of China Science Citation Database (CSCD), a core journal of Peking University, a source journal of Chinese science and technology paper statistics (China Science and Technology Core Journals), a core academic journal of RCCSE, a high-quality scientific and technical journal of China, a high-quality scientific and technical journal of China Association for Science and Technology, and a high-quality scientific and technical journal of China Biomedical Science and Technology Association. We have been published in China Biomedical Literature Database (SinoMed), China Knowledge Network, Wanfang Data Knowledge Service Platform, China Academic Journal Abstracts, Scopus Database, Chemical Abstracts (USA), Japan Science and Technology Agency (JSTA) Database, Copernicus Abstracts (Poland), Abstracts of the Centre for Agricultural and Biological Sciences (CABS) of the United Kingdom, Cambridge Scientific Abstracts ProQuest Database, WHO Medical Journal of the Western Pacific Region (WMPR), and WHO Medical Journal of the Western Pacific Region (WMPR) of the United States. We have been included in dozens of authoritative databases at home and abroad, such as WHO Western Pacific Region Index of Medicine (WPRIM), Ullrich's Guide to Periodicals, and so on.